382 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31706410)
1. The factors associated with forensic psychiatrists' decisions in criminal responsibility and social dangerousness evaluations.
Mandarelli G; Carabellese F; Felthous AR; Parmigiani G; Del Casale A; Catanesi R; Montalbò D; Ferracuti S
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2019; 66():101503. PubMed ID: 31706410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Group dynamics in forensic pretrial decision-making.
Pitt SE; Brandt JD; Tellefsen C; Janofsky JS; Cohen ME; Bettis ED; Rappeport JR
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1997; 25(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 9148886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Psychiatric aspects of criminal responsibility: insanity and mitigation.
Burrows M; Reid WH
J Psychiatr Pract; 2011 Nov; 17(6):429-31. PubMed ID: 22108401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Neuroscience in forensic psychiatry: From responsibility to dangerousness. Ethical and legal implications of using neuroscience for dangerousness assessments.
Gkotsi GM; Gasser J
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2016; 46():58-67. PubMed ID: 27209602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mental illness and legal fitness (competence) to stand trial in New York State: expert opinion and criminal defendants' psychiatric symptoms.
Lee E; Rosner R; Harmon R
J Forensic Sci; 2014 Jul; 59(4):1008-15. PubMed ID: 24820936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [The application of evaluation tools for criminal responsibility in forensic psychiatric expertise].
Fu PX; Wang J; Shi TT; Hu JN; Zhu MX
Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Jun; 26(3):210-3. PubMed ID: 20707283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Differences in psychiatric expertise of responsibility: Assessment and initial hypotheses through a review of literature].
Guivarch J; Piercecchi-Marti MD; Glezer D; Chabannes JM
Encephale; 2015 Jun; 41(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 25864036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Forensic psychiatric expert witnessing within the criminal justice system in Germany.
Konrad N; Völlm B
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2014; 37(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 24268458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A neurolaw perspective on psychiatric assessments of criminal responsibility: decision-making, mental disorder, and the brain.
Meynen G
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2013; 36(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 23433730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of concordance between conclusions of forensic psychiatric evaluation and court decisions after 2005 Criminal Code Amendment in a Taiwan psychiatric hospital.
Yang TW; Yu JM; Pan CH
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2017; 54():148-154. PubMed ID: 28743408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An analogue study of the factors influencing competency decisions.
Blashfield RK; Robbins L; Barnard GW
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(4):587-94. PubMed ID: 7718931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reassessing the aftercare treatment of individuals found not guilty due to a mental disability in Hunan, China: supplemental study into the disposition of mentally ill offenders after forensic psychiatric assessment.
Wang X; Zhang D; Jiang S; Bai Y; Cucolo HE; Perlin ML
Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 2007 Apr; 41(4):337-42. PubMed ID: 17464720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Factors related to bias in forensic psychiatric assessments in criminal matters: A systematic review.
Meyer LF; Valença AM
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2021; 75():101681. PubMed ID: 33712325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical neuropsychology in the criminal forensic setting.
Denney RL; Wynkoop TF
J Head Trauma Rehabil; 2000 Apr; 15(2):804-28. PubMed ID: 10739969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Forensic psychiatric evaluations: an overview of methods, ethical issues, and criminal and civil assessments.
Sher L
Int J Adolesc Med Health; 2015 May; 27(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 25411982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Criminal responsibility evaluations: Benchmarking in different countries.
Pouls C; Jeandarme I; Al-Taiar H; Bradford J; Canton W; Kristiansson M; Thibaut F; Verreyt V; Konrad N
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2022; 81():101775. PubMed ID: 35066422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Criminal responsibility in schizophrenia with special attention to the mental state during the criminal act--a study based upon the activation-recurrence phenomenon].
Higashi T
Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 2009; 111(7):762-88. PubMed ID: 19827562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of a new instrument to guide and support insanity evaluations: the defendant's insanity assessment support scale (DIASS).
Parmigiani G; Mandarelli G; Roma P; Ferracuti S
Transl Psychiatry; 2022 Mar; 12(1):115. PubMed ID: 35318308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fitness, responsibility, and judicially ordered assessments.
Ohayon MM; Crocker A; St-Onge B; Caulet M
Can J Psychiatry; 1998 Jun; 43(5):491-5. PubMed ID: 9653533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Difference between the cognitive and control ability and the responsibility in forensic psychiatry evaluation].
Li XW; Gao BL; Hu F; Wu C; Zhang H; Guan YJ; Lai W; Li Y; Wang Y; Wu DL; Cao XL
Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Aug; 29(4):263-7. PubMed ID: 24350541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
