400 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31706946)
1. Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-directed Biopsy Strategies for Changing the Paradigm of Prostate Cancer Diagnosis.
Schoots IG; Padhani AR; Rouvière O; Barentsz JO; Richenberg J
Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Feb; 3(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 31706946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk-based MRI-directed diagnostic pathway outperforms non-risk-based pathways in suspected prostate cancer biopsy-naïve men: a large cohort validation study.
Bittencourt LK; Guricova K; Zucker I; Durieux JC; Schoots IG
Eur Radiol; 2022 Apr; 32(4):2330-2339. PubMed ID: 35028750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging, with or Without Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy, and Systematic Biopsy for Detecting Prostate Cancer: A Cochrane Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Drost FH; Osses D; Nieboer D; Bangma CH; Steyerberg EW; Roobol MJ; Schoots IG
Eur Urol; 2020 Jan; 77(1):78-94. PubMed ID: 31326219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Prospective Multicenter Comparison Study of Risk-adapted Ultrasound-directed and Magnetic Resonance Imaging-directed Diagnostic Pathways for Suspected Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-naïve Men.
Wagensveld IM; Osses DF; Groenendijk PM; Zijta FM; Busstra MB; Rociu E; Barentsz JO; Michiel Sedelaar JP; Arbeel B; Roeleveld T; Geenen R; Koeter I; van der Meer SA; Cappendijk V; Somford R; Klaver S; Van der Lely H; Wolters T; Hellings W; Leter MR; Van der Poel HG; Heijmink SWTPJ; Debruyne F; Immerzeel J; Leijte J; van Roermund J; Miclea R; Planken E; Vis AN; Jan de Jong I; Tijsterman J; Wolterbeek D; Claessen A; Vrijhof E; Nederend J; Van Leenders GJLH; Bangma CH; Krestin GP; Remmers S; Schoots IG;
Eur Urol; 2022 Sep; 82(3):318-326. PubMed ID: 35341658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prostate MRI, with or without MRI-targeted biopsy, and systematic biopsy for detecting prostate cancer.
Drost FH; Osses DF; Nieboer D; Steyerberg EW; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ; Schoots IG
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2019 Apr; 4(4):CD012663. PubMed ID: 31022301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. High Diagnostic Performance of Short Magnetic Resonance Imaging Protocols for Prostate Cancer Detection in Biopsy-naïve Men: The Next Step in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Accessibility.
van der Leest M; Israël B; Cornel EB; Zámecnik P; Schoots IG; van der Lelij H; Padhani AR; Rovers M; van Oort I; Sedelaar M; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Hannink G; Veltman J; Barentsz J
Eur Urol; 2019 Nov; 76(5):574-581. PubMed ID: 31167748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-Naive Men: The Biparametric MRI for Detection of Prostate Cancer (BIDOC) Study.
Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Bisbjerg R; Thestrup KC; Winther MD; Jakobsen H; Thomsen HS
JAMA Netw Open; 2018 Jun; 1(2):e180219. PubMed ID: 30646066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy may enhance the diagnostic accuracy of significant prostate cancer detection compared to standard transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Schoots IG; Roobol MJ; Nieboer D; Bangma CH; Steyerberg EW; Hunink MG
Eur Urol; 2015 Sep; 68(3):438-50. PubMed ID: 25480312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An Evaluation of Screening Pathways Using a Combination of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Prostate-specific Antigen: Results from the IP1-PROSTAGRAM Study.
Eldred-Evans D; Tam H; Sokhi H; Padhani AR; Connor M; Price D; Gammon M; Klimowska-Nassar N; Burak P; Day E; Winkler M; Fiorentino F; Ahmed HU
Eur Urol Oncol; 2023 Jun; 6(3):295-302. PubMed ID: 37080821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical Utility of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging as the First-line Tool for Men with High Clinical Suspicion of Prostate Cancer.
Panebianco V; Valerio MC; Giuliani A; Pecoraro M; Ceravolo I; Barchetti G; Catalano C; Padhani AR
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Aug; 1(3):208-214. PubMed ID: 31102623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Role of Multiparametric MRI and MRI-targeted Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Radiorecurrent Prostate Cancer: An Analysis from the FORECAST Trial.
Light A; Kanthabalan A; Otieno M; Pavlou M; Omar R; Adeleke S; Giganti F; Brew-Graves C; Williams NR; Emara A; Haroon A; Latifoltojar A; Sidhu H; Freeman A; Orczyk C; Nikapota A; Dudderidge T; Hindley RG; Virdi J; Arya M; Payne H; Mitra AV; Bomanji J; Winkler M; Horan G; Moore CM; Emberton M; Punwani S; Ahmed HU; Shah TT
Eur Urol; 2024 Jan; 85(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 37778954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsy: A Systematic Review.
Valerio M; Donaldson I; Emberton M; Ehdaie B; Hadaschik BA; Marks LS; Mozer P; Rastinehad AR; Ahmed HU
Eur Urol; 2015 Jul; 68(1):8-19. PubMed ID: 25454618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy a useful addition to systematic confirmatory biopsy in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Schoots IG; Nieboer D; Giganti F; Moore CM; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ
BJU Int; 2018 Dec; 122(6):946-958. PubMed ID: 29679430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeting on Overdiagnosis and Overtreatment of Prostate Cancer.
Vickers AJ
Eur Urol; 2021 Nov; 80(5):567-572. PubMed ID: 34294510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy Versus Systematic Biopsy in the Detection of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Kasivisvanathan V; Stabile A; Neves JB; Giganti F; Valerio M; Shanmugabavan Y; Clement KD; Sarkar D; Philippou Y; Thurtle D; Deeks J; Emberton M; Takwoingi Y; Moore CM
Eur Urol; 2019 Sep; 76(3):284-303. PubMed ID: 31130434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of prostate systematic and targeted biopsy on the basis of multiparametric MRI in biopsy-naive patients (MRI-FIRST): a prospective, multicentre, paired diagnostic study.
Rouvière O; Puech P; Renard-Penna R; Claudon M; Roy C; Mège-Lechevallier F; Decaussin-Petrucci M; Dubreuil-Chambardel M; Magaud L; Remontet L; Ruffion A; Colombel M; Crouzet S; Schott AM; Lemaitre L; Rabilloud M; Grenier N;
Lancet Oncol; 2019 Jan; 20(1):100-109. PubMed ID: 30470502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prostate Cancer Diagnostics Using a Combination of the Stockholm3 Blood Test and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Grönberg H; Eklund M; Picker W; Aly M; Jäderling F; Adolfsson J; Landquist M; Haug ES; Ström P; Carlsson S; Nordström T
Eur Urol; 2018 Dec; 74(6):722-728. PubMed ID: 30001824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prostate cancer upgrading with serial prostate magnetic resonance imaging and repeat biopsy in men on active surveillance: are confirmatory biopsies still necessary?
Osses DF; Drost FH; Verbeek JFM; Luiting HB; van Leenders GJLH; Bangma CH; Krestin GP; Roobol MJ; Schoots IG
BJU Int; 2020 Jul; 126(1):124-132. PubMed ID: 32232921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Risk-based Patient Selection for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsy after Negative Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Random Biopsy Avoids Unnecessary Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scans.
Alberts AR; Schoots IG; Bokhorst LP; van Leenders GJ; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1129-34. PubMed ID: 26651990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound Informed Prostate Biopsy for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis in Biopsy Naïve Men: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Goldberg H; Ahmad AE; Chandrasekar T; Klotz L; Emberton M; Haider MA; Taneja SS; Arora K; Fleshner N; Finelli A; Perlis N; Tyson MD; Klaassen Z; Wallis CJD
J Urol; 2020 Jun; 203(6):1085-1093. PubMed ID: 31609177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
