242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31707629)
1. Alveolar crest contour changes after guided bone regeneration using different biomaterials: an experimental in vivo investigation.
Di Raimondo R; Sanz-Esporrín J; Plá R; Sanz-Martín I; Luengo F; Vignoletti F; Nuñez J; Sanz M
Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Jul; 24(7):2351-2361. PubMed ID: 31707629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hard and soft tissue changes after guided bone regeneration using two different barrier membranes: an experimental in vivo investigation.
Di Raimondo R; Sanz-Esporrín J; Sanz-Martin I; Plá R; Luengo F; Vignoletti F; Nuñez J; Sanz M
Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Apr; 25(4):2213-2227. PubMed ID: 32851532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Preclinical study of the effects of fluorinated porcine hydroxyapatite in repairing peri-implant bone defects in canine mandible].
Li ZP; Liu YX; Huang RX; Liu CW; Liu RH; Liu Q; Huang BX; Chen ZT; Chen ZF
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Nov; 55(11):908-914. PubMed ID: 33171567
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Guided bone regeneration of peri-implant defects with particulated and block xenogenic bone substitutes.
Benic GI; Thoma DS; Muñoz F; Sanz Martin I; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 May; 27(5):567-76. PubMed ID: 26073212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contour changes after guided bone regeneration of large non-contained mandibular buccal bone defects using deproteinized bovine bone mineral and a porcine-derived collagen membrane: an experimental in vivo investigation.
Sanz-Martin I; Ferrantino L; Vignoletti F; Nuñez J; Baldini N; Duvina M; Alcaraz J; Sanz M
Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Apr; 22(3):1273-1283. PubMed ID: 28975415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Guided bone regeneration with particulate vs. block xenogenic bone substitutes: a pilot cone beam computed tomographic investigation.
Benic GI; Thoma DS; Jung RE; Sanz-Martin I; Unger S; Cantalapiedra A; Hämmerle CHF
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Nov; 28(11):e262-e270. PubMed ID: 28378530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of rhBMP-2 on Guided Bone Regeneration for Placement and Functional Loading of Dental Implants: A Radiographic and Histologic Study in Dogs.
Ben Amara H; Lee JW; Kim JJ; Kang YM; Kang EJ; Koo KT
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(6):e265-e276. PubMed ID: 29140389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Simultaneous lateral bone augmentation and implant placement using a particulated synthetic bone substitute around chronic peri-implant dehiscence defects in dogs.
Jung UW; Cha JK; Vignoletti F; Nuñez J; Sanz J; Sanz M
J Clin Periodontol; 2017 Nov; 44(11):1172-1180. PubMed ID: 28815664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hard tissue changes after guided bone regeneration of peri-implant defects comparing block versus particulate bone substitutes: 6-month results of a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Benic GI; Eisner BM; Jung RE; Basler T; Schneider D; Hämmerle CHF
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Oct; 30(10):1016-1026. PubMed ID: 31332835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Immunohistochemical characteristics of lateral bone augmentation using different biomaterials around chronic peri-implant dehiscence defects: An experimental in vivo study.
Cha JK; Pla R; Vignoletti F; Jung UW; Sanz-Esporrin J; Sanz M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 May; 32(5):569-580. PubMed ID: 33629461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Augmentation stability and early wound healing outcomes of guided bone regeneration in peri-implant dehiscence defects with L- and I-shaped soft block bone substitutes: A clinical and radiographic study.
Jung EH; Jeong SN; Lee JH
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Nov; 32(11):1308-1317. PubMed ID: 34423887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A randomized controlled clinical trial comparing small buccal dehiscence defects around dental implants treated with guided bone regeneration or left for spontaneous healing.
Jung RE; Herzog M; Wolleb K; Ramel CF; Thoma DS; Hämmerle CH
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Mar; 28(3):348-354. PubMed ID: 26923088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Guided bone regeneration at zirconia and titanium dental implants: a pilot histological investigation.
Benic GI; Thoma DS; Sanz-Martin I; Munoz F; Hämmerle CHF; Cantalapiedra A; Fischer J; Jung RE
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Dec; 28(12):1592-1599. PubMed ID: 28653343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Guided bone regeneration with a synthetic biodegradable membrane: a comparative study in dogs.
Jung RE; Kokovic V; Jurisic M; Yaman D; Subramani K; Weber FE
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Aug; 22(8):802-7. PubMed ID: 21198905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bone augmentation at peri-implant dehiscence defects comparing a synthetic polyethylene glycol hydrogel matrix vs. standard guided bone regeneration techniques.
Thoma DS; Jung UW; Park JY; Bienz SP; Hüsler J; Jung RE
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Jul; 28(7):e76-e83. PubMed ID: 27206342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Single stage surgery combining transmucosal implant placement with guided bone regeneration and bioresorbable materials.
Hämmerle CH; Lang NP
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2001 Feb; 12(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 11168266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Volumetric changes following ridge preservation or spontaneous healing and early implant placement with simultaneous guided bone regeneration.
Naenni N; Bienz SP; Muñoz F; Hämmerle CHF; Jung RE; Thoma DS
J Clin Periodontol; 2018 Apr; 45(4):484-494. PubMed ID: 29266354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative analysis of collagen membranes for the treatment of implant dehiscence defects.
Oh TJ; Meraw SJ; Lee EJ; Giannobile WV; Wang HL
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2003 Feb; 14(1):80-90. PubMed ID: 12562369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of ridge preservation for early implant placement - is there a need to remove the biomaterial?
Thoma DS; Naenni N; Benic GI; Muñoz F; Hämmerle CHF; Jung RE
J Clin Periodontol; 2017 May; 44(5):556-565. PubMed ID: 28207942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Guided bone regeneration and abutment connection augment the buccal soft tissue contour: 3-year results of a prospective comparative clinical study.
Benic GI; Ge Y; Gallucci GO; Jung RE; Schneider D; Hämmerle CH
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Feb; 28(2):219-225. PubMed ID: 26856399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
