These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31708070)

  • 21. Do the findings of case series studies vary significantly according to methodological characteristics?
    Dalziel K; Round A; Stein K; Garside R; Castelnuovo E; Payne L
    Health Technol Assess; 2005 Jan; 9(2):iii-iv, 1-146. PubMed ID: 15588556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evidence-based decision-making 3: Health technology assessment.
    O'Reilly D; Campbell K; Vanstone M; Bowen JM; Schwartz L; Assasi N; Goeree R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1281():417-41. PubMed ID: 25694325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. International overview of health technology assessment training tools and materials for patients and consumers.
    Low E; André-Vert J; Fanelli G; Galbraith M
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2023 Sep; 39(1):e61. PubMed ID: 37732420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Practical tools and methods for health technology assessment in Europe: structures, methodologies, and tools developed by the European Network for Health Technology Assessment, EUnetHTA.
    Kristensen FB; Lampe K; Chase DL; Lee-Robin SH; Wild C; Moharra M; Garrido MV; Nielsen CP; Røttingen JA; Neikter SA; Bistrup ML;
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Dec; 25 Suppl 2():1-8. PubMed ID: 20030885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Issues in methodological research: perspectives from researchers and commissioners.
    Lilford RJ; Richardson A; Stevens A; Fitzpatrick R; Edwards S; Rock F; Hutton JL
    Health Technol Assess; 2001; 5(8):1-57. PubMed ID: 11368832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. AN INTEGRATED PERSPECTIVE ON THE ASSESSMENT OF TECHNOLOGIES: INTEGRATE-HTA.
    Wahlster P; Brereton L; Burns J; Hofmann B; Mozygemba K; Oortwijn W; Pfadenhauer L; Polus S; Rehfuess E; Schilling I; van der Wilt GJ; Gerhardus A
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2017 Jan; 33(5):544-551. PubMed ID: 28756780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Conceptual framework and systematic review of the effects of participants' and professionals' preferences in randomised controlled trials.
    King M; Nazareth I; Lampe F; Bower P; Chandler M; Morou M; Sibbald B; Lai R
    Health Technol Assess; 2005 Sep; 9(35):1-186, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 16153352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. International comparison of the definition and the practical application of health technology assessment.
    Draborg E; Gyrd-Hansen D; Poulsen PB; Horder M
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2005; 21(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 15736519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Health technology assessment of public health interventions: an analysis of characteristics and comparison of methods-study protocol.
    Mathes T; Willms G; Polus S; Stegbauer C; Messer M; Klingler C; Ehrenreich H; Niebuhr D; Marckmann G; Gerhardus A; Pieper D
    Syst Rev; 2018 May; 7(1):79. PubMed ID: 29792224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Development of a decisional flowchart for meaningful patient involvement in Health Technology Assessment.
    Toledo-Chávarri A; Gagnon MP; Álvarez-Pérez Y; Perestelo-Pérez L; Triñanes Pego Y; Serrano Aguilar P;
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2020 Dec; 37():e3. PubMed ID: 33267914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Health technology assessment: research trends and future priorities in Europe.
    Nielsen CP; Funch TM; Kristensen FB
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2011 Jul; 16 Suppl 2():6-15. PubMed ID: 21737525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Patient-based health technology assessment: a vision of the future.
    Bridges JF; Jones C
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2007; 23(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 17234014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [HTA goes Europe: European collaboration on joint assessment and methodological issues becomes reality].
    Nachtnebel A; Mayer J; Erdös J; Lampe K; Kleijnen S; Schnell-Inderst P; Wild C
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2015; 109(4-5):291-9. PubMed ID: 26354129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Health Technology Assessment in nursing: a literature review.
    Ramacciati N
    Int Nurs Rev; 2013 Mar; 60(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 23406233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. WHAT IS THE ROLE OF COMMUNITY PREFERENCE INFORMATION IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT DECISION MAKING? A CASE STUDY OF COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING.
    Wortley S; Flitcroft K; Howard K
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2015 Jan; 31(4):241-8. PubMed ID: 26376934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Ranking the Criteria Used in the Appraisal of Drugs for Reimbursement: A Stated Preferences Elicitation With Health Technology Assessment Stakeholders Across Jurisdictional Contexts.
    Wranik WD; Jakubczyk M; Drachal K
    Value Health; 2020 Apr; 23(4):471-480. PubMed ID: 32327164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Introducing patients' and the public's perspectives to health technology assessment: A systematic review of international experiences.
    Gagnon MP; Desmartis M; Lepage-Savary D; Gagnon J; St-Pierre M; Rhainds M; Lemieux R; Gauvin FP; Pollender H; Légaré F
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2011 Jan; 27(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 21262085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Nature and reporting characteristics of UK health technology assessment systematic reviews.
    Carroll C; Kaltenthaler E
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 May; 18(1):35. PubMed ID: 29739352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.