These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31708197)

  • 1. Trial Registry Use in Surgery Systematic Reviews: A Cross-Sectional Study.
    Gray HM; Simpson A; Bowers A; Johnson AL; Vassar M
    J Surg Res; 2020 Mar; 247():323-331. PubMed ID: 31708197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical trial registry use in anaesthesiology systematic reviews: A cross-sectional study of systematic reviews published in anaesthesiology journals and the Cochrane Library.
    Umberham BA; Detweiler BN; Sims MT; Vassar M
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2017 Dec; 34(12):797-807. PubMed ID: 28731924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical Trial Registry Use in Orthopaedic Surgery Systematic Reviews.
    Reddy AK; Anderson JM; Gray HM; Fishbeck K; Vassar M
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2021 May; 103(10):e41. PubMed ID: 33983151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical trial registry use in minimally invasive surgical oncology systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Fuller K; Bowers A; Vassar M
    BMJ Evid Based Med; 2020 Apr; 25(2):1-2. PubMed ID: 31427352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Trial Registry Searches in Plastic Surgery Systematic Reviews: A Meta-epidemiological Study.
    Hughes GK; Garrett EP; Staggs JD; Reddy AK; Wiebe JE; Vassar M
    J Surg Res; 2023 Aug; 288():21-27. PubMed ID: 36948029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Infrequent use of clinical trials registries in published systematic reviews in urology.
    Aro T; Koo K; Matlaga BR
    World J Urol; 2020 May; 38(5):1335-1340. PubMed ID: 31444605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Systematic Reviews Published in Emergency Medicine Journals Do Not Routinely Search Clinical Trials Registries: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.
    Keil LG; Platts-Mills TF; Jones CW
    Ann Emerg Med; 2015 Oct; 66(4):424-427.e2. PubMed ID: 25447560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical trials registries are underused in the pregnancy and childbirth literature: a systematic review of the top 20 journals.
    Yerokhin VV; Carr BK; Sneed G; Vassar M
    BMC Res Notes; 2016 Oct; 9(1):475. PubMed ID: 27769265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical trial registry searches are under-utilized in systematic reviews from critical care journals: A bibliometric analysis.
    Greiner B; Corcoran A; Wheeler D
    J Crit Care; 2021 Jun; 63():175-178. PubMed ID: 33012585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical trials registries are under-utilized in the conduct of systematic reviews: a cross-sectional analysis.
    Jones CW; Keil LG; Weaver MA; Platts-Mills TF
    Syst Rev; 2014 Oct; 3():126. PubMed ID: 25348628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Utilization of Clinical Trials Registries in Obstetrics and Gynecology Systematic Reviews.
    Bibens ME; Chong AB; Vassar M
    Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 127(2):248-53. PubMed ID: 26942350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of reporting bias on meta-analyses of drug trials: reanalysis of meta-analyses.
    Hart B; Lundh A; Bero L
    BMJ; 2012 Jan; 344():d7202. PubMed ID: 22214754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of inclusion of industry trial results registries as an information source for systematic reviews.
    Potthast R; Vervölgyi V; McGauran N; Kerekes MF; Wieseler B; Kaiser T
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e92067. PubMed ID: 24743113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Systematic Reviewers in Clinical Neurology Do Not Routinely Search Clinical Trials Registries.
    Sinnett PM; Carr B; Cook G; Mucklerath H; Varney L; Weiher M; Yerokhin V; Vassar M
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0134596. PubMed ID: 26225564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A protocol for a systematic review on the impact of unpublished studies and studies published in the gray literature in meta-analyses.
    Schmucker C; Bluemle A; Briel M; Portalupi S; Lang B; Motschall E; Schwarzer G; Bassler D; Mueller KF; von Elm E; Meerpohl JJ;
    Syst Rev; 2013 May; 2():24. PubMed ID: 23634657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Publication Bias and Nonreporting Found in Majority of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in Anesthesiology Journals.
    Hedin RJ; Umberham BA; Detweiler BN; Kollmorgen L; Vassar M
    Anesth Analg; 2016 Oct; 123(4):1018-25. PubMed ID: 27537925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify clinical trial registration is insufficient: a cross-sectional study.
    Banno M; Tsujimoto Y; Kataoka Y
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):200. PubMed ID: 32711471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Extent of non-publication in cohorts of studies approved by research ethics committees or included in trial registries.
    Schmucker C; Schell LK; Portalupi S; Oeller P; Cabrera L; Bassler D; Schwarzer G; Scherer RW; Antes G; von Elm E; Meerpohl JJ;
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e114023. PubMed ID: 25536072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A cross-sectional audit showed that most Cochrane intervention reviews searched trial registers.
    Berber S; Tan-Koay AG; Opiyo N; Dwan K; Glanville JM; Lasserson TJ; Willson ML
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Sep; 113():86-91. PubMed ID: 31150835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the usefulness of Internet searches to identify unpublished clinical trials for systematic reviews.
    Eysenbach G; Tuische J; Diepgen TL
    Med Inform Internet Med; 2001; 26(3):203-18. PubMed ID: 11706930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.