These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3170942)

  • 1. Duration discrimination of speech and tonal complex stimuli by normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bochner JH; Snell KB; MacKenzie DJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Aug; 84(2):493-500. PubMed ID: 3170942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The time course of acoustic/phonemic cue integration in the sensorineurally hearing-impaired listener.
    Schum DJ; Collins MJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Jun; 87(6):2716-28. PubMed ID: 2373805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Providing low- and mid-frequency speech information to listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Turner CW; Brus SL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jun; 109(6):2999-3006. PubMed ID: 11425142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using a vocoder-based frequency-lowering method and spectral enhancement to improve place-of-articulation perception for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Kong YY; Mullangi A
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):300-12. PubMed ID: 23165224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Limiting spectral resolution in speech for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Turner CW; Chi SL; Flock S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1999 Aug; 42(4):773-84. PubMed ID: 10450899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Labeling of /s/ and [see text] by listeners with normal and impaired hearing, revisited.
    Hedrick MS; Younger MS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2003 Jun; 46(3):636-48. PubMed ID: 14696991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spectral cues to perception of /d, n, l/ by normal- and impaired-hearing listeners.
    Revoile SG; Pickett JM; Kozma-Spytek L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Aug; 90(2 Pt 1):787-98. PubMed ID: 1939885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Individual differences in auditory discrimination of spectral shape and speech-identification performance among elderly listeners.
    Shrivastav MN; Humes LE; Kewley-Port D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Feb; 119(2):1131-42. PubMed ID: 16521774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of relative and overall amplitude on perception of voiceless stop consonants by listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Hedrick MS; Schulte L; Jesteadt W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Sep; 98(3):1292-303. PubMed ID: 7560503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The relation between identification and discrimination of vowels in young and elderly listeners.
    Coughlin M; Kewley-Port D; Humes LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Dec; 104(6):3597-607. PubMed ID: 9857518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perception of clear fricatives by normal-hearing and simulated hearing-impaired listeners.
    Maniwa K; Jongman A; Wade T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1114-25. PubMed ID: 18247912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stop-consonant recognition for normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. I: The contribution of selected frequency regions.
    Dubno JR; Dirks DD; Ellison DE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jan; 85(1):347-54. PubMed ID: 2921417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vowel intelligibility in clear and conversational speech for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Ferguson SH; Kewley-Port D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jul; 112(1):259-71. PubMed ID: 12141351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tonal confusions in Thai patients with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Nimitbunnasarn C; Amatyakul P; Gandour J; Carney A; Nimitbunnasarn C; Amatyakul P
    J Speech Hear Res; 1984 Mar; 27(1):89-97. PubMed ID: 6717012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. FO processing and the separation of competing speech signals by listeners with normal hearing and with hearing loss.
    Summers V; Leek MR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1998 Dec; 41(6):1294-306. PubMed ID: 9859885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of frequency selectivity and consonant recognition among hearing-impaired and masked normal-hearing listeners.
    Dubno JR; Schaefer AB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Apr; 91(4 Pt 1):2110-21. PubMed ID: 1597602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Human frequency-following responses: representation of second formant transitions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Plyler PN; Ananthanarayan AK
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2001; 12(10):523-33. PubMed ID: 11791939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Double-vowel perception in listeners with cochlear hearing loss: differences in fundamental frequency, ear of presentation, and relative amplitude.
    Arehart KH; Rossi-Katz J; Swensson-Prutsman J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Feb; 48(1):236-52. PubMed ID: 15938067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Age-related differences in identification and discrimination of temporal cues in speech segments.
    Gordon-Salant S; Yeni-Komshian GH; Fitzgibbons PJ; Barrett J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Apr; 119(4):2455-66. PubMed ID: 16642858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.