These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31709482)

  • 1. Proposal for an optimized method for sustainable remediation evaluation and application: implementation of a multi-criteria process.
    Braun AB; Trentin AWDS; Visentin C; Thomé A
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Dec; 26(35):35996-36006. PubMed ID: 31709482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. SCORE: a novel multi-criteria decision analysis approach to assessing the sustainability of contaminated land remediation.
    Rosén L; Back PE; Söderqvist T; Norrman J; Brinkhoff P; Norberg T; Volchko Y; Norin M; Bergknut M; Döberl G
    Sci Total Environ; 2015 Apr; 511():621-38. PubMed ID: 25594905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Critical review of decision support tools for sustainability assessment of site remediation options.
    Huysegoms L; Cappuyns V
    J Environ Manage; 2017 Jul; 196():278-296. PubMed ID: 28288362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sustainable remediation through the risk management perspective and stakeholder involvement: A systematic and bibliometric view of the literature.
    Braun AB; Trentin AWDS; Visentin C; Thomé A
    Environ Pollut; 2019 Dec; 255(Pt 1):113221. PubMed ID: 31541824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantitative Assessment of Life Cycle Sustainability (QUALICS): Framework and its application to assess electrokinetic remediation.
    da S Trentin AW; Reddy KR; Kumar G; Chetri JK; Thomé A
    Chemosphere; 2019 Sep; 230():92-106. PubMed ID: 31102876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measuring sustainable development using a multi-criteria model: a case study.
    Boggia A; Cortina C
    J Environ Manage; 2010 Nov; 91(11):2301-6. PubMed ID: 20630647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The rationale for simple approaches for sustainability assessment and management in contaminated land practice.
    Bardos RP; Bone BD; Boyle R; Evans F; Harries ND; Howard T; Smith JW
    Sci Total Environ; 2016 Sep; 563-564():755-68. PubMed ID: 26765509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using soil function evaluation in multi-criteria decision analysis for sustainability appraisal of remediation alternatives.
    Volchko Y; Norrman J; Rosén L; Bergknut M; Josefsson S; Söderqvist T; Norberg T; Wiberg K; Tysklind M
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Jul; 485-486():785-791. PubMed ID: 24529453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inclusion of social indicators in decision support tools for the selection of sustainable site remediation options.
    Cappuyns V
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Dec; 184(Pt 1):45-56. PubMed ID: 27450992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sustainability assessment of electrokinetic bioremediation compared with alternative remediation options for a petroleum release site.
    Gill RT; Thornton SF; Harbottle MJ; Smith JW
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Dec; 184(Pt 1):120-131. PubMed ID: 27511828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Incorporating the soil function concept into sustainability appraisal of remediation alternatives.
    Volchko Y; Norrman J; Bergknut M; Rosén L; Söderqvist T
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Nov; 129():367-76. PubMed ID: 23994579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing sustainable remediation frameworks using sustainability principles.
    Ridsdale DR; Noble BF
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Dec; 184(Pt 1):36-44. PubMed ID: 27637806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Uses and misuses of multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) in environmental decision making.
    Steele K; Carmel Y; Cross J; Wilcox C
    Risk Anal; 2009 Jan; 29(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 18826413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Systematic and bibliographic review of sustainability indicators for contaminated site remediation: Comparison between China and western nations.
    Li X; Cundy AB; Chen W; Lyu S
    Environ Res; 2021 Sep; 200():111490. PubMed ID: 34116018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Targeted selection of brownfields from portfolios for sustainable regeneration: User experiences from five cases testing the Timbre Brownfield Prioritization Tool.
    Bartke S; Martinát S; Klusáček P; Pizzol L; Alexandrescu F; Frantál B; Critto A; Zabeo A
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Dec; 184(Pt 1):94-107. PubMed ID: 27452774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using an innovative criteria weighting tool for stakeholders involvement to rank MSW facility sites with the AHP.
    De Feo G; De Gisi S
    Waste Manag; 2010 Nov; 30(11):2370-82. PubMed ID: 20444589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Life cycle sustainability assessment of the nanoscale zero-valent iron synthesis process for application in contaminated site remediation.
    Visentin C; Trentin AWDS; Braun AB; Thomé A
    Environ Pollut; 2021 Jan; 268(Pt B):115915. PubMed ID: 33126160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of stochastic multi-criteria decision analysis to support sustainable management of contaminated sediments.
    Sparrevik M; Barton DN; Bates ME; Linkov I
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Feb; 46(3):1326-34. PubMed ID: 22191941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Aggregating sustainability indicators: beyond the weighted sum.
    Rowley HV; Peters GM; Lundie S; Moore SJ
    J Environ Manage; 2012 Nov; 111():24-33. PubMed ID: 22813856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Finnish policy approach and measures for the promotion of sustainability in contaminated land management.
    Reinikainen J; Sorvari J; Tikkanen S
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Dec; 184(Pt 1):108-119. PubMed ID: 27589916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.