These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31709809)

  • 1. Prevalence and significance of race and ethnicity subgroup analyses in Cochrane intervention reviews.
    Liu P; Ross JS; Ioannidis JP; Dhruva SS; Vasiliou V; Wallach JD
    Clin Trials; 2020 Apr; 17(2):231-234. PubMed ID: 31709809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Age-treatment subgroup analyses in Cochrane intervention reviews: a meta-epidemiological study.
    Liu P; Ioannidis JPA; Ross JS; Dhruva SS; Luxkaranayagam AT; Vasiliou V; Wallach JD
    BMC Med; 2019 Oct; 17(1):188. PubMed ID: 31639007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reporting and handling missing outcome data in mental health: a systematic review of Cochrane systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Spineli LM; Pandis N; Salanti G
    Res Synth Methods; 2015 Jun; 6(2):175-87. PubMed ID: 26099485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reporting and analyses of sex/gender and race/ethnicity in randomized controlled trials of interventions published in the highest-ranking anesthesiology journals.
    Begic D; Janda-Martinac C; Vrdoljak M; Puljak L
    J Comp Eff Res; 2019 Dec; 8(16):1417-1423. PubMed ID: 31789050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Cochrane collaboration: systematic reviews and their relevance to epilepsy. The Cochrane Epilepsy Network.
    Marson A; Beghi E; Berg A; Chadwick D; Tonini C
    Epilepsia; 1996 Oct; 37(10):917-21. PubMed ID: 8822687
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized trials: principles and pitfalls.
    da Costa BR; Juni P
    Eur Heart J; 2014 Dec; 35(47):3336-45. PubMed ID: 25416325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evidence-based reviews and meta-analysis.
    Evans J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2010 May; 149(5):701-3. PubMed ID: 20399923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Issues regarding systematic review reports and trial heterogeneity.
    Meads C; Sheffield D
    J Nerv Ment Dis; 2005 Jun; 193(6):424-5; author reply 425-6. PubMed ID: 15920385
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Association between unreported outcomes and effect size estimates in Cochrane meta-analyses.
    Furukawa TA; Watanabe N; Omori IM; Montori VM; Guyatt GH
    JAMA; 2007 Feb; 297(5):468-70. PubMed ID: 17284696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Practical methodology of meta-analyses (overviews) using updated individual patient data. Cochrane Working Group.
    Stewart LA; Clarke MJ
    Stat Med; 1995 Oct; 14(19):2057-79. PubMed ID: 8552887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Many reviews are systematic but some are more transparent and completely reported than others.
    PLoS Medicine Editors
    PLoS Med; 2007 Mar; 4(3):e147. PubMed ID: 17388685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Individual patient data meta-analyses.
    Clarke MJ
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Feb; 19(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 15749065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Introducing conceptual and analytical clarity on dimensions of complexity in systematic reviews of complex interventions.
    Tharyan P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Nov; 66(11):1202-4. PubMed ID: 24079643
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of reporting of ethnicity in US and European randomised controlled trials.
    Sheikh A; Netuveli G; Kai J; Panesar SS
    BMJ; 2004 Jul; 329(7457):87-8. PubMed ID: 15138158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statistical methods can be improved within Cochrane pregnancy and childbirth reviews.
    Riley RD; Gates S; Neilson J; Alfirevic Z
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Jun; 64(6):608-18. PubMed ID: 21109399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Randomized Trials, Meta-Analyses, and Systematic Reviews: Using Examples from Rheumatology.
    Pope JE; Hazlewood GS
    Rheum Dis Clin North Am; 2018 May; 44(2):295-305. PubMed ID: 29622296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A systematic review of analytical methods used to study subgroups in (individual patient data) meta-analyses.
    Koopman L; van der Heijden GJ; Glasziou PP; Grobbee DE; Rovers MM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Oct; 60(10):1002-9. PubMed ID: 17884593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Literature searching for randomized controlled trials used in Cochrane reviews: rapid versus exhaustive searches.
    Royle P; Milne R
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2003; 19(4):591-603. PubMed ID: 15095765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Systematic review of the literature--an instrument to capture research results].
    Malmivaara A
    Duodecim; 2002; 118(9):877-9. PubMed ID: 12238165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.