236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31710169)
1. Implementing non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in the Netherlands: An interview study exploring opinions about and experiences with societal pressure, reimbursement, and an expanding scope.
Bakkeren IM; Kater-Kuipers A; Bunnik EM; Go ATJI; Tibben A; de Beaufort ID; Galjaard RH; Riedijk SR
J Genet Couns; 2020 Feb; 29(1):112-121. PubMed ID: 31710169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Limits to the scope of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): an analysis of the international ethical framework for prenatal screening and an interview study with Dutch professionals.
Kater-Kuipers A; Bunnik EM; de Beaufort ID; Galjaard RJH
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 Oct; 18(1):409. PubMed ID: 30340550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing prenatal screening experiences of Icelandic women who received false-positive and true-negative first-trimester combined screening results in Iceland in 2012-2016.
Thorolfsdottir E; Lunde Å; Stefansdottir V; Hjartardottir H; Rut Haraldsdottir K
J Genet Couns; 2020 Aug; 29(4):644-657. PubMed ID: 32198907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of experiential knowledge and societal perceptions on decision-making regarding non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT).
Montgomery S; Thayer ZM
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Oct; 20(1):630. PubMed ID: 33076858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Financial contribution as reason to opt out of non-invasive prenatal testing.
Bet BB; Wielart L; Ravelli ACJ; van Wely M; van Leeuwen E; Pajkrt E
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Aug; 287():130-136. PubMed ID: 37311275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The consequences of implementing non-invasive prenatal testing in Dutch national health care: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Beulen L; Grutters JP; Faas BH; Feenstra I; van Vugt JM; Bekker MN
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Nov; 182():53-61. PubMed ID: 25238658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidies with cell-free DNA in the general pregnancy population: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Fairbrother G; Burigo J; Sharon T; Song K
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(7):1160-4. PubMed ID: 26000626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Non-invasive prenatal screening for trisomy 21: what women want and are willing to pay.
Verweij EJ; Oepkes D; de Vries M; van den Akker ME; van den Akker ES; de Boer MA
Patient Educ Couns; 2013 Dec; 93(3):641-5. PubMed ID: 24011429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Obstetric professionals' perceptions of non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome: clinical usefulness compared with existing tests and ethical implications.
Ngan OMY; Yi H; Wong SYS; Sahota D; Ahmed S
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Sep; 17(1):285. PubMed ID: 28870159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): societal pressure or freedom of choice? A vignette study of Dutch citizens' attitudes.
Kater-Kuipers A; Bakkeren IM; Riedijk SR; Go ATJI; Polak MG; Galjaard RH; de Beaufort ID; Bunnik EM
Eur J Hum Genet; 2021 Jan; 29(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 32759960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. NIPT-based screening for Down syndrome and beyond: what do pregnant women think?
van Schendel RV; Dondorp WJ; Timmermans DR; van Hugte EJ; de Boer A; Pajkrt E; Lachmeijer AM; Henneman L
Prenat Diagn; 2015 Jun; 35(6):598-604. PubMed ID: 25693726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Attitudes of pregnant women and male partners towards non-invasive prenatal testing and widening the scope of prenatal screening.
van Schendel RV; Kleinveld JH; Dondorp WJ; Pajkrt E; Timmermans DR; Holtkamp KC; Karsten M; Vlietstra AL; Lachmeijer AM; Henneman L
Eur J Hum Genet; 2014 Dec; 22(12):1345-50. PubMed ID: 24642832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Experiences of receiving an increased chance of sex chromosome aneuploidy result from non-invasive prenatal testing in Australia: "A more complicated scenario than what I had ever realized".
Lewit-Mendes MF; Robson H; Kelley J; Elliott J; Brown E; Menezes M; Archibald AD
J Genet Couns; 2023 Feb; 32(1):213-223. PubMed ID: 36114608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Introduction of non-invasive prenatal testing as a first-tier aneuploidy screening test: A survey among Dutch midwives about their role as counsellors.
Martin L; Gitsels-van der Wal JT; de Boer MA; Vanstone M; Henneman L
Midwifery; 2018 Jan; 56():1-8. PubMed ID: 29024868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Implementation challenges for an ethical introduction of noninvasive prenatal testing: a qualitative study of healthcare professionals' views from Lebanon and Quebec.
Haidar H; Vanstone M; Laberge AM; Bibeau G; Ghulmiyyah L; Ravitsky V
BMC Med Ethics; 2020 Feb; 21(1):15. PubMed ID: 32041603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Uptake of noninvasive prenatal testing at a large academic referral center.
Larion S; Warsof SL; Romary L; Mlynarczyk M; Peleg D; Abuhamad AZ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 211(6):651.e1-7. PubMed ID: 24954652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Women's Experience with Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing and Emotional Well-being and Satisfaction after Test-Results.
van Schendel RV; Page-Christiaens GCML; Beulen L; Bilardo CM; de Boer MA; Coumans ABC; Faas BHW; van Langen IM; Lichtenbelt KD; van Maarle MC; Macville MVE; Oepkes D; Pajkrt E; Henneman L;
J Genet Couns; 2017 Dec; 26(6):1348-1356. PubMed ID: 28667567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. 'Small cost to pay for peace of mind': Women's experiences with non-invasive prenatal testing.
Bowman-Smart H; Savulescu J; Mand C; Gyngell C; Pertile MD; Lewis S; Delatycki MB
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Oct; 59(5):649-655. PubMed ID: 30724335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A new era in prenatal care: non-invasive prenatal testing in Switzerland.
Manegold-Brauer G; Kang Bellin A; Hahn S; De Geyter C; Buechel J; Hoesli I; Lapaire O
Swiss Med Wkly; 2014 Feb; 144():w13915. PubMed ID: 24549748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Should pregnant women be charged for non-invasive prenatal screening? Implications for reproductive autonomy and equal access.
Bunnik EM; Kater-Kuipers A; Galjaard RH; de Beaufort ID
J Med Ethics; 2020 Mar; 46(3):194-198. PubMed ID: 31527142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
