These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31710169)
1. Implementing non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in the Netherlands: An interview study exploring opinions about and experiences with societal pressure, reimbursement, and an expanding scope. Bakkeren IM; Kater-Kuipers A; Bunnik EM; Go ATJI; Tibben A; de Beaufort ID; Galjaard RH; Riedijk SR J Genet Couns; 2020 Feb; 29(1):112-121. PubMed ID: 31710169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Limits to the scope of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): an analysis of the international ethical framework for prenatal screening and an interview study with Dutch professionals. Kater-Kuipers A; Bunnik EM; de Beaufort ID; Galjaard RJH BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 Oct; 18(1):409. PubMed ID: 30340550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing prenatal screening experiences of Icelandic women who received false-positive and true-negative first-trimester combined screening results in Iceland in 2012-2016. Thorolfsdottir E; Lunde Å; Stefansdottir V; Hjartardottir H; Rut Haraldsdottir K J Genet Couns; 2020 Aug; 29(4):644-657. PubMed ID: 32198907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of experiential knowledge and societal perceptions on decision-making regarding non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT). Montgomery S; Thayer ZM BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Oct; 20(1):630. PubMed ID: 33076858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Financial contribution as reason to opt out of non-invasive prenatal testing. Bet BB; Wielart L; Ravelli ACJ; van Wely M; van Leeuwen E; Pajkrt E Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Aug; 287():130-136. PubMed ID: 37311275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The consequences of implementing non-invasive prenatal testing in Dutch national health care: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Beulen L; Grutters JP; Faas BH; Feenstra I; van Vugt JM; Bekker MN Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Nov; 182():53-61. PubMed ID: 25238658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidies with cell-free DNA in the general pregnancy population: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Fairbrother G; Burigo J; Sharon T; Song K J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(7):1160-4. PubMed ID: 26000626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Non-invasive prenatal screening for trisomy 21: what women want and are willing to pay. Verweij EJ; Oepkes D; de Vries M; van den Akker ME; van den Akker ES; de Boer MA Patient Educ Couns; 2013 Dec; 93(3):641-5. PubMed ID: 24011429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Obstetric professionals' perceptions of non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome: clinical usefulness compared with existing tests and ethical implications. Ngan OMY; Yi H; Wong SYS; Sahota D; Ahmed S BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Sep; 17(1):285. PubMed ID: 28870159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): societal pressure or freedom of choice? A vignette study of Dutch citizens' attitudes. Kater-Kuipers A; Bakkeren IM; Riedijk SR; Go ATJI; Polak MG; Galjaard RH; de Beaufort ID; Bunnik EM Eur J Hum Genet; 2021 Jan; 29(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 32759960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. NIPT-based screening for Down syndrome and beyond: what do pregnant women think? van Schendel RV; Dondorp WJ; Timmermans DR; van Hugte EJ; de Boer A; Pajkrt E; Lachmeijer AM; Henneman L Prenat Diagn; 2015 Jun; 35(6):598-604. PubMed ID: 25693726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Attitudes of pregnant women and male partners towards non-invasive prenatal testing and widening the scope of prenatal screening. van Schendel RV; Kleinveld JH; Dondorp WJ; Pajkrt E; Timmermans DR; Holtkamp KC; Karsten M; Vlietstra AL; Lachmeijer AM; Henneman L Eur J Hum Genet; 2014 Dec; 22(12):1345-50. PubMed ID: 24642832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Experiences of receiving an increased chance of sex chromosome aneuploidy result from non-invasive prenatal testing in Australia: "A more complicated scenario than what I had ever realized". Lewit-Mendes MF; Robson H; Kelley J; Elliott J; Brown E; Menezes M; Archibald AD J Genet Couns; 2023 Feb; 32(1):213-223. PubMed ID: 36114608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Introduction of non-invasive prenatal testing as a first-tier aneuploidy screening test: A survey among Dutch midwives about their role as counsellors. Martin L; Gitsels-van der Wal JT; de Boer MA; Vanstone M; Henneman L Midwifery; 2018 Jan; 56():1-8. PubMed ID: 29024868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Implementation challenges for an ethical introduction of noninvasive prenatal testing: a qualitative study of healthcare professionals' views from Lebanon and Quebec. Haidar H; Vanstone M; Laberge AM; Bibeau G; Ghulmiyyah L; Ravitsky V BMC Med Ethics; 2020 Feb; 21(1):15. PubMed ID: 32041603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Uptake of noninvasive prenatal testing at a large academic referral center. Larion S; Warsof SL; Romary L; Mlynarczyk M; Peleg D; Abuhamad AZ Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 211(6):651.e1-7. PubMed ID: 24954652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Women's Experience with Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing and Emotional Well-being and Satisfaction after Test-Results. van Schendel RV; Page-Christiaens GCML; Beulen L; Bilardo CM; de Boer MA; Coumans ABC; Faas BHW; van Langen IM; Lichtenbelt KD; van Maarle MC; Macville MVE; Oepkes D; Pajkrt E; Henneman L; J Genet Couns; 2017 Dec; 26(6):1348-1356. PubMed ID: 28667567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. 'Small cost to pay for peace of mind': Women's experiences with non-invasive prenatal testing. Bowman-Smart H; Savulescu J; Mand C; Gyngell C; Pertile MD; Lewis S; Delatycki MB Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Oct; 59(5):649-655. PubMed ID: 30724335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A new era in prenatal care: non-invasive prenatal testing in Switzerland. Manegold-Brauer G; Kang Bellin A; Hahn S; De Geyter C; Buechel J; Hoesli I; Lapaire O Swiss Med Wkly; 2014 Feb; 144():w13915. PubMed ID: 24549748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Should pregnant women be charged for non-invasive prenatal screening? Implications for reproductive autonomy and equal access. Bunnik EM; Kater-Kuipers A; Galjaard RH; de Beaufort ID J Med Ethics; 2020 Mar; 46(3):194-198. PubMed ID: 31527142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]