These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31710679)

  • 1. Pooled genotyping strategies for the rapid construction of genomic reference populations1.
    Alexandre PA; Porto-Neto LR; Karaman E; Lehnert SA; Reverter A
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Dec; 97(12):4761-4769. PubMed ID: 31710679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In silico validation of pooled genotyping strategies for genomic evaluation in Angus cattle.
    Alexandre PA; Reverter A; Lehnert SA; Porto-Neto LR; Dominik S
    J Anim Sci; 2020 Jun; 98(6):. PubMed ID: 32428206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genomic prediction using pooled data in a single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction framework.
    Baller JL; Kachman SD; Kuehn LA; Spangler ML
    J Anim Sci; 2020 Jun; 98(6):. PubMed ID: 32497209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development of genomic predictions for Angus cattle in Brazil incorporating genotypes from related American sires.
    Campos GS; Cardoso FF; Gomes CCG; Domingues R; de Almeida Regitano LC; de Sena Oliveira MC; de Oliveira HN; Carvalheiro R; Albuquerque LG; Miller S; Misztal I; Lourenco D
    J Anim Sci; 2022 Feb; 100(2):. PubMed ID: 35031806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genomic prediction ability for beef fatty acid profile in Nelore cattle using different pseudo-phenotypes.
    Chiaia HLJ; Peripolli E; de Oliveira Silva RM; Feitosa FLB; de Lemos MVA; Berton MP; Olivieri BF; Espigolan R; Tonussi RL; Gordo DGM; de Albuquerque LG; de Oliveira HN; Ferrinho AM; Mueller LF; Kluska S; Tonhati H; Pereira ASC; Aguilar I; Baldi F
    J Appl Genet; 2018 Nov; 59(4):493-501. PubMed ID: 30251238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Leveraging low-density crossbred genotypes to offset crossbred phenotypes and their impact on purebred predictions.
    Leite NG; Chen CY; Herring WO; Holl J; Tsuruta S; Lourenco D
    J Anim Sci; 2022 Dec; 100(12):. PubMed ID: 36309902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of GEBV of sires based on pooled allele frequency of their progeny.
    Vargas Jurado N; Kuehn LA; Keele JW; Lewis RM
    G3 (Bethesda); 2021 Oct; 11(11):. PubMed ID: 34510188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multi-breed genomic evaluation for tropical beef cattle when no pedigree information is available.
    Hayes BJ; Copley J; Dodd E; Ross EM; Speight S; Fordyce G
    Genet Sel Evol; 2023 Oct; 55(1):71. PubMed ID: 37845626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of predicting genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in Angus and Charolais beef cattle.
    Chen L; Schenkel F; Vinsky M; Crews DH; Li C
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Oct; 91(10):4669-78. PubMed ID: 24078618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A mating advice system in dairy cattle incorporating genomic information.
    Carthy TR; McCarthy J; Berry DP
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Sep; 102(9):8210-8220. PubMed ID: 31229287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genomic prediction of milk-production traits and somatic cell score using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor with random regression test-day model in Thai dairy cattle.
    Buaban S; Prempree S; Sumreddee P; Duangjinda M; Masuda Y
    J Dairy Sci; 2021 Dec; 104(12):12713-12723. PubMed ID: 34538484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genomic analyses of tropical beef cattle fertility based on genotyping pools of Brahman cows with unknown pedigree.
    Reverter A; Porto-Neto LR; Fortes MR; McCulloch R; Lyons RE; Moore S; Nicol D; Henshall J; Lehnert SA
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Oct; 94(10):4096-4108. PubMed ID: 27898866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of overlapping DNA pools to discern genetic differences despite pooling error.
    Keele JW; McDaneld TG; Kuehn LA
    J Anim Sci; 2023 Jan; 101():. PubMed ID: 37227930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Controlling bias in genomic breeding values for young genotyped bulls.
    Tsuruta S; Lourenco DAL; Masuda Y; Misztal I; Lawlor TJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Nov; 102(11):9956-9970. PubMed ID: 31495630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Application of selection index calculations to determine selection strategies in genomic breeding programs.
    König S; Swalve HH
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Oct; 92(10):5292-303. PubMed ID: 19762847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Towards multi-breed genomic evaluations for female fertility of tropical beef cattle.
    Hayes BJ; Corbet NJ; Allen JM; Laing AR; Fordyce G; Lyons R; McGowan MR; Burns BM
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Jan; 97(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 30371787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Application of genomic evaluation to dairy cattle in New Zealand.
    Winkelman AM; Johnson DL; Harris BL
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Jan; 98(1):659-75. PubMed ID: 25468702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges.
    Hayes BJ; Bowman PJ; Chamberlain AJ; Goddard ME
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Feb; 92(2):433-43. PubMed ID: 19164653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimation of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in a multibreed cattle population.
    Khansefid M; Pryce JE; Bolormaa S; Miller SP; Wang Z; Li C; Goddard ME
    J Anim Sci; 2014 Aug; 92(8):3270-83. PubMed ID: 25074450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genomic selection for tolerance to heat stress in Australian dairy cattle.
    Nguyen TTT; Bowman PJ; Haile-Mariam M; Pryce JE; Hayes BJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Apr; 99(4):2849-2862. PubMed ID: 27037467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.