These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31710679)

  • 21. Genomic analysis of feed efficiency traits in beef cattle using random regression models.
    Ramos PVB; de Oliveira Menezes GR; da Silva DA; Lourenco D; Santiago GG; Torres Júnior RAA; Silva FFE; Lopes PS; Veroneze R
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2024 May; 141(3):291-303. PubMed ID: 38062881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Genomic evaluation of Brown Swiss dairy cattle with limited national genotype data and integrated external information.
    Luštrek B; Vandenplas J; Gorjanc G; Potočnik K
    J Dairy Sci; 2021 May; 104(5):5738-5754. PubMed ID: 33685705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Accuracy of Igenity genomically estimated breeding values for predicting Australian Angus BREEDPLAN traits.
    Boerner V; Johnston D; Wu XL; Bauck S
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Feb; 93(2):513-21. PubMed ID: 25549982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Exploring the size of reference population for expected accuracy of genomic prediction using simulated and real data in Japanese Black cattle.
    Takeda M; Inoue K; Oyama H; Uchiyama K; Yoshinari K; Sasago N; Kojima T; Kashima M; Suzuki H; Kamata T; Kumagai M; Takasugi W; Aonuma T; Soma Y; Konno S; Saito T; Ishida M; Muraki E; Inoue Y; Takayama M; Nariai S; Hideshima R; Nakamura R; Nishikawa S; Kobayashi H; Shibata E; Yamamoto K; Yoshimura K; Matsuda H; Inoue T; Fujita A; Terayama S; Inoue K; Morita S; Nakashima R; Suezawa R; Hanamure T; Zoda A; Uemoto Y
    BMC Genomics; 2021 Nov; 22(1):799. PubMed ID: 34742249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multi-breed dairy cattle populations.
    Hayes BJ; Bowman PJ; Chamberlain AC; Verbyla K; Goddard ME
    Genet Sel Evol; 2009 Nov; 41(1):51. PubMed ID: 19930712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Genomic predictions for economically important traits in Brazilian Braford and Hereford beef cattle using true and imputed genotypes.
    Piccoli ML; Brito LF; Braccini J; Cardoso FF; Sargolzaei M; Schenkel FS
    BMC Genet; 2017 Jan; 18(1):2. PubMed ID: 28100165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Assessing the impact of natural service bulls and genotype by environment interactions on genetic gain and inbreeding in organic dairy cattle genomic breeding programs.
    Yin T; Wensch-Dorendorf M; Simianer H; Swalve HH; König S
    Animal; 2014 Jun; 8(6):877-86. PubMed ID: 24703184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Changes in genomic predictions when new information is added.
    Hidalgo J; Lourenco D; Tsuruta S; Masuda Y; Miller S; Bermann M; Garcia ALS; Misztal I
    J Anim Sci; 2021 Feb; 99(2):. PubMed ID: 33544869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Efficient large-scale single-step evaluations and indirect genomic prediction of genotyped selection candidates.
    Vandenplas J; Ten Napel J; Darbaghshahi SN; Evans R; Calus MPL; Veerkamp R; Cromie A; Mäntysaari EA; Strandén I
    Genet Sel Evol; 2023 Jun; 55(1):37. PubMed ID: 37291510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Genomic prediction for Nordic Red Cattle using one-step and selection index blending.
    Su G; Madsen P; Nielsen US; Mäntysaari EA; Aamand GP; Christensen OF; Lund MS
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Feb; 95(2):909-17. PubMed ID: 22281355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Optimum multistage genomic selection in dairy cattle.
    Börner V; Teuscher F; Reinsch N
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Apr; 95(4):2097-107. PubMed ID: 22459855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Application of single-step genomic evaluation using multiple-trait random regression test-day models in dairy cattle.
    Oliveira HR; Lourenco DAL; Masuda Y; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Jamrozik J; Brito LF; Silva FF; Schenkel FS
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Mar; 102(3):2365-2377. PubMed ID: 30638992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Accuracies of genomically estimated breeding values from pure-breed and across-breed predictions in Australian beef cattle.
    Boerner V; Johnston DJ; Tier B
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Oct; 46(1):61. PubMed ID: 25927468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Genomic prediction based on runs of homozygosity.
    Luan T; Yu X; Dolezal M; Bagnato A; Meuwissen TH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Oct; 46(1):64. PubMed ID: 25284459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of genomic predictions for lowly heritable traits using multi-step and single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in Holstein cattle.
    Guarini AR; Lourenco DAL; Brito LF; Sargolzaei M; Baes CF; Miglior F; Misztal I; Schenkel FS
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Sep; 101(9):8076-8086. PubMed ID: 29935829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Use of a Bayesian model including QTL markers increases prediction reliability when test animals are distant from the reference population.
    Ma P; Lund MS; Aamand GP; Su G
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Aug; 102(8):7237-7247. PubMed ID: 31155255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Genetic parameters for carcass traits of progeny of beef bulls mated to dairy cows.
    Keele JW; Foraker BA; Boldt R; Kemp C; Kuehn LA; Woerner DR
    J Anim Sci; 2024 Jan; 102():. PubMed ID: 38489760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Core-dependent changes in genomic predictions using the Algorithm for Proven and Young in single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction.
    Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Pocrnic I; Lourenco D
    J Anim Sci; 2020 Dec; 98(12):. PubMed ID: 33211798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of number of training generations on genomic prediction for various traits in a layer chicken population.
    Weng Z; Wolc A; Shen X; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC; Arango J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Mar; 48():22. PubMed ID: 26992471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Bias, dispersion, and accuracy of genomic predictions for feedlot and carcase traits in Australian Angus steers.
    Alexandre PA; Li Y; Hine BC; Duff CJ; Ingham AB; Porto-Neto LR; Reverter A
    Genet Sel Evol; 2021 Sep; 53(1):77. PubMed ID: 34565347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.