BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31710897)

  • 1. Inter and intra-individual variation in skeletal DNA preservation in buried remains.
    Emmons AL; Davoren J; DeBruyn JM; Mundorff AZ
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jan; 44():102193. PubMed ID: 31710897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. High DNA yield from metatarsal and metacarpal bones from Slovenian Second World War skeletal remains.
    Zupanc T; Podovšovnik E; Obal M; Zupanič Pajnič I
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Mar; 51():102426. PubMed ID: 33248348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identifying victims of the largest Second World War family massacre in Slovenia.
    Zupanič Pajnič I; Obal M; Zupanc T
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Jan; 306():110056. PubMed ID: 31765883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Postmortem Skeletal Microbial Community Composition and Function in Buried Human Remains.
    Emmons AL; Mundorff AZ; Hoeland KM; Davoren J; Keenan SW; Carter DO; Campagna SR; DeBruyn JM
    mSystems; 2022 Apr; 7(2):e0004122. PubMed ID: 35353006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of DNA preservation between ribs and vertebrae.
    Božič L; Benedik Bevc T; Podovšovnik E; Zupanc T; Zupanič Pajnič I
    Int J Legal Med; 2022 Sep; 136(5):1247-1253. PubMed ID: 35729437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Examination of DNA yield rates for different skeletal elements at increasing post mortem intervals.
    Mundorff A; Davoren JM
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Jan; 8(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 24315589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of nuclear DNA yield and STR typing success in Second World War petrous bones and metacarpals III.
    Zupanič Pajnič I; Inkret J; Zupanc T; Podovšovnik E
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Nov; 55():102578. PubMed ID: 34425360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of DNA yield and STR success rates from different tissues in embalmed bodies.
    Wheeler A; Czado N; Gangitano D; Turnbough M; Hughes-Stamm S
    Int J Legal Med; 2017 Jan; 131(1):61-66. PubMed ID: 27338932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation Of A Powder-Free DNA Extraction Method For Skeletal Remains.
    Harrel M; Mayes C; Gangitano D; Hughes-Stamm S
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Nov; 63(6):1819-1823. PubMed ID: 29411392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Kinship analysis of 5th- to 6th-century skeletons of Romanized indigenous people from the Bled-Pristava archaeological site.
    Zupanič Pajnič I; Geršak ŽM; Leskovar T; Črešnar M
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2023 Jul; 65():102886. PubMed ID: 37137206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of a New DNA Extraction Method on Challenging Bone Samples Recovered from a WWII Mass Grave.
    Di Stefano B; Zupanič Pajnič I; Concato M; Bertoglio B; Calvano MG; Sorçaburu Ciglieri S; Bosetti A; Grignani P; Addoum Y; Vetrini R; Introna F; Bonin S; Previderè C; Fattorini P
    Genes (Basel); 2024 May; 15(6):. PubMed ID: 38927608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prediction of autosomal STR typing success in ancient and Second World War bone samples.
    Zupanič Pajnič I; Zupanc T; Balažic J; Geršak ŽM; Stojković O; Skadrić I; Črešnar M
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Mar; 27():17-26. PubMed ID: 27907810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. DNA Profiling Success Rates from Degraded Skeletal Remains in Guatemala.
    Johnston E; Stephenson M
    J Forensic Sci; 2016 Jul; 61(4):898-902. PubMed ID: 27364268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An optimal skeletal element for DNA testing: Evaluation of DNA quantity and quality from various bone types in routine forensic practice.
    Otagiri T; Sato N; Shiozaki T; Harayama Y; Matsumoto M; Kobayashi K; Asamura H
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2024 May; 68():102415. PubMed ID: 38280273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Utility of the Ion S5™ and MiSeq FGx™ sequencing platforms to characterize challenging human remains.
    Elwick K; Bus MM; King JL; Chang J; Hughes-Stamm S; Budowle B
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2019 Nov; 41():101623. PubMed ID: 31499459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intra-bone nuclear DNA variability and STR typing success in Second World War 12th thoracic vertebrae.
    Benedik Bevc T; Božič L; Podovšovnik E; Zupanc T; Zupanič Pajnič I
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Nov; 55():102587. PubMed ID: 34479116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intra- and Inter-Element Variability in Mitochondrial and Nuclear DNA from Fresh and Environmentally Exposed Skeletal Remains.
    Antinick TC; Foran DR
    J Forensic Sci; 2019 Jan; 64(1):88-97. PubMed ID: 29940697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Challenges with co-amplification of microbial DNA in interpretation of STR profiles obtained from human skeletal remains.
    Smajlović-Skenderagić L; Idrizbegović S; Brkanić L; Bilić A; Huel R; Parsons TJ
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Mar; 51():102452. PubMed ID: 33429136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dead and buried? Variation in post-mortem histories revealed through histotaphonomic characterisation of human bone from megalithic graves in Sweden.
    Hollund HI; Blank M; Sjögren KG
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0204662. PubMed ID: 30281639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. DNA extraction method from bones using Maxwell® 16.
    Karija Vlahović M; Kubat M
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2012 Sep; 14(5):272-5. PubMed ID: 22626613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.