37 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31710986)
1. Assessment of the invariance and discriminant power of morphological features under geometric transformations for breast tumor classification.
Gómez-Flores W; Hernández-López J
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Mar; 185():105173. PubMed ID: 31710986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fus2Net: a novel Convolutional Neural Network for classification of benign and malignant breast tumor in ultrasound images.
Ma H; Tian R; Li H; Sun H; Lu G; Liu R; Wang Z
Biomed Eng Online; 2021 Nov; 20(1):112. PubMed ID: 34794443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Breast Tumor Classification Using Intratumoral Quantitative Ultrasound Descriptors.
Muhtadi S
Comput Math Methods Med; 2022; 2022():1633858. PubMed ID: 35295204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Benign and Malignant Breast Tumor Classification Method via Efficiently Combining Texture and Morphological Features on Ultrasound Images.
Wei M; Du Y; Wu X; Su Q; Zhu J; Zheng L; Lv G; Zhuang J
Comput Math Methods Med; 2020; 2020():5894010. PubMed ID: 33062038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast Tumor Classification in Ultrasound Images by Fusion of Deep Convolutional Neural Network and Shallow LBP Feature.
Chen H; Ma M; Liu G; Wang Y; Jin Z; Liu C
J Digit Imaging; 2023 Jun; 36(3):932-946. PubMed ID: 36720840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of Feature Selection Methods for Mammographic Breast Cancer Diagnosis in a Unified Framework.
Tian CJ; Lv J; Xu XF
Biomed Res Int; 2021; 2021():6079163. PubMed ID: 34646886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cystic (including atypical) and solid breast lesion classification using the different features of quantitative ultrasound parametric images.
Kolchev AA; Pasynkov DV; Egoshin IA; Kliouchkin IV; Pasynkova OO
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2022 Feb; 17(2):219-228. PubMed ID: 34727337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. HoVer-Trans: Anatomy-Aware HoVer-Transformer for ROI-Free Breast Cancer Diagnosis in Ultrasound Images.
Mo Y; Han C; Liu Y; Liu M; Shi Z; Lin J; Zhao B; Huang C; Qiu B; Cui Y; Wu L; Pan X; Xu Z; Huang X; Li Z; Liu Z; Wang Y; Liang C
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2023 Jun; 42(6):1696-1706. PubMed ID: 37018705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A New Feature Ensemble with a Multistage Classification Scheme for Breast Cancer Diagnosis.
Isikli Esener I; Ergin S; Yuksel T
J Healthc Eng; 2017; 2017():3895164. PubMed ID: 29065592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Classification of Benign and Malignant Breast Tumors in Ultrasound Images with Posterior Acoustic Shadowing Using Half-Contour Features.
Zhou Z; Wu S; Chang KJ; Chen WR; Chen YS; Kuo WH; Lin CC; Tsui PH
J Med Biol Eng; 2015; 35(2):178-187. PubMed ID: 25960706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. LRSCnet: Local Reference Semantic Code learning for breast tumor classification in ultrasound images.
Zhang G; Ren Y; Xi X; Li D; Guo J; Li X; Tian C; Xu Z
Biomed Eng Online; 2021 Dec; 20(1):127. PubMed ID: 34920726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A scale- and orientation-adaptive extension of Local Binary Patterns for texture classification.
Hegenbart S; Uhl A
Pattern Recognit; 2015 Aug; 48(8):2633-2644. PubMed ID: 26240440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On the classification of simple and complex biological images using Krawtchouk moments and Generalized pseudo-Zernike moments: a case study with fly wing images and breast cancer mammograms.
Goh JY; Khang TF
PeerJ Comput Sci; 2021; 7():e698. PubMed ID: 34604523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robust Ulcer Classification: Contrast and Illumination Invariant Approach.
Alhajlah M
Diagnostics (Basel); 2022 Nov; 12(12):. PubMed ID: 36552905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Application of Feature Extraction Methods for Chemical Risk Classification in the Pharmaceutical Industry.
Topolski M
Sensors (Basel); 2021 Aug; 21(17):. PubMed ID: 34502644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improving the sensitivity of liver tumor classification in ultrasound images via a power-law shot noise model.
Karako K; Mihara Y; Hasegawa K; Chen Y
Biosci Trends; 2023 May; 17(2):117-125. PubMed ID: 37045784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of image processing technique and discriminant analysis methods in postharvest processing of carrot fruit.
Jahanbakhshi A; Kheiralipour K
Food Sci Nutr; 2020 Jul; 8(7):3346-3352. PubMed ID: 32724599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Spectral properties of size-invariant shape transformation.
Aydin A
Phys Rev E; 2023 May; 107(5-1):054108. PubMed ID: 37328965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. ECLiPSE: A Versatile Classification Technique for Structural and Morphological Analysis of Super-Resolution Microscopy Data.
Hugelier S; Kim H; Gyparaki MT; Bond C; Tang Q; Santiago-Ruiz AN; Porta S; Lakadamyali M
bioRxiv; 2023 May; ():. PubMed ID: 37215010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Constraining classifiers in molecular analysis: invariance and robustness.
Lausser L; Szekely R; Klimmek A; Schmid F; Kestler HA
J R Soc Interface; 2020 Feb; 17(163):20190612. PubMed ID: 32019472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
