These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31711077)

  • 1. Impact of Implant Length on Survival of Rough-Surface Implants in Nonaugmented Posterior Areas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis.
    Ravidà A; Majzoub J; Alassadi M; Saleh MH; Askar H; Wang HL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(6):1359-1369. PubMed ID: 31711077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review.
    Wallace SS; Froum SJ
    Ann Periodontol; 2003 Dec; 8(1):328-43. PubMed ID: 14971260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A 3-arm study of early loading of rough-surfaced implants in the completely edentulous maxilla and in the edentulous posterior maxilla and mandible: results after 1 year of loading.
    Nordin T; Nilsson R; Frykholm A; Hallman M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):880-6. PubMed ID: 15623065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Short dental implants versus standard dental implants placed in the posterior jaws: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Lemos CA; Ferro-Alves ML; Okamoto R; Mendonça MR; Pellizzer EP
    J Dent; 2016 Apr; 47():8-17. PubMed ID: 26804969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Survival rates of short (6 mm) micro-rough surface implants: a review of literature and meta-analysis.
    Srinivasan M; Vazquez L; Rieder P; Moraguez O; Bernard JP; Belser UC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 May; 25(5):539-45. PubMed ID: 23413956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-term outcome of one-piece implants. Part I: implant characteristics and loading protocols. A systematic literature review with meta-analysis.
    Barrachina-Diez JM; Tashkandi E; Stampf S; Att W
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):503-18. PubMed ID: 23527353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Short implants (5-8 mm) vs. long implants in augmented bone and their impact on peri-implant bone in maxilla and/or mandible: Systematic review.
    Amine M; Guelzim Y; Benfaida S; Bennani A; Andoh A
    J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Apr; 120(2):133-142. PubMed ID: 30472460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Survival of short implants is improved with greater implant length, placement in the mandible compared with the maxilla, and in nonsmokers.
    Carr AB
    J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2012 Sep; 12(3 Suppl):189-91. PubMed ID: 23253845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Narrow-diameter implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Schiegnitz E; Al-Nawas B
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16():21-40. PubMed ID: 30328192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Role of implant diameter on long-term survival of dental implants placed in posterior maxilla: a systematic review.
    Javed F; Romanos GE
    Clin Oral Investig; 2015 Jan; 19(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 25366871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In selected sites, short, rough-surfaced dental implants are as successful as long dental implants: a critical summary of Pommer B, Frantal S, Willer J, Posch M, Watzek G, Tepper G. Impact of dental implant length on early failure rates: a meta-analysis of observational studies. J Clin Periodontol 2011;38(9):856-863.
    Balevi B
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2013 Feb; 144(2):195-6. PubMed ID: 23372136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Survival of short dental implants for treatment of posterior partial edentulism: a systematic review.
    Atieh MA; Zadeh H; Stanford CM; Cooper LF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(6):1323-31. PubMed ID: 23189281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of implant-failure predictors in the posterior maxilla: a retrospective study of 1395 implants.
    Pabst AM; Walter C; Ehbauer S; Zwiener I; Ziebart T; Al-Nawas B; Klein MO
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Apr; 43(3):414-20. PubMed ID: 25697051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Immediate and early loading of Straumann implants with a chemically modified surface (SLActive) in the posterior mandible and maxilla: 1-year results from a prospective multicenter study.
    Ganeles J; Zöllner A; Jackowski J; ten Bruggenkate C; Beagle J; Guerra F
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1119-28. PubMed ID: 18983314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Survival of dental implants in native and grafted bone in irradiated head and neck cancer patients: a retrospective analysis.
    Buddula A; Assad DA; Salinas TJ; Garces YI
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(5):644-8. PubMed ID: 22406706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Short implants versus longer implants in the posterior alveolar region after an observation period of at least five years: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Xu X; Huang J; Fu X; Kuang Y; Yue H; Song J; Xu L
    J Dent; 2020 Sep; 100():103386. PubMed ID: 32479956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Implants of 6 mm vs. 11 mm lengths in the posterior maxilla and mandible: a 1-year multicenter randomized controlled trial.
    Guljé F; Abrahamsson I; Chen S; Stanford C; Zadeh H; Palmer R
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Dec; 24(12):1325-31. PubMed ID: 22938573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of dental implant length on early failure rates: a meta-analysis of observational studies.
    Pommer B; Frantal S; Willer J; Posch M; Watzek G; Tepper G
    J Clin Periodontol; 2011 Sep; 38(9):856-63. PubMed ID: 21722154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Number of implants placed for complete-arch fixed prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Daudt Polido W; Aghaloo T; Emmett TW; Taylor TD; Morton D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16():154-183. PubMed ID: 30328199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Short Implants (5 to 8 mm) Versus Longer Implants (>8 mm) with Sinus Lifting in Atrophic Posterior Maxilla: A Meta-Analysis of RCTs.
    Fan T; Li Y; Deng WW; Wu T; Zhang W
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Feb; 19(1):207-215. PubMed ID: 27295262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.