These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31711078)

  • 1. Effects of Mechanical Instrumentation with Commercially Available Instruments Used in Supportive Peri-implant Therapy: An In Vitro Study.
    Sirinirund B; Garaicoa-Pazmino C; Wang HL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(6):1370-1378. PubMed ID: 31711078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [In vitro effects on rough implant surfaces of different instrumentations used in the surgical therapy of peri-implantitis].
    Espedito Di Lauro A; Morgese F; Squillace A; Ramaglia L
    Minerva Stomatol; 2003; 52(1-2):1-7. PubMed ID: 12686908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of piezoelectric ultrasonic instrumentation on titanium discs: a microscopy and trace elemental analysis in vitro study.
    Tawse-Smith A; Atieh MA; Tompkins G; Duncan WJ; Reid MR; Stirling CH
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2016 Aug; 14(3):191-201. PubMed ID: 26094557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of ultrasonic scaler tips and toothbrush on titanium disc surfaces evaluated with confocal microscopy.
    Park JB; Kim N; Ko Y
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 23(5):1552-8. PubMed ID: 22976659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of titanium brush on machined and sand-blasted/acid-etched titanium disc using confocal microscopy and contact profilometry.
    Park JB; Jeon Y; Ko Y
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Feb; 26(2):130-6. PubMed ID: 24299063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The maintenance of inserted titanium implants: in-vitro evaluation of exposed surfaces cleaned with three different instruments.
    Bertoldi C; Lusuardi D; Battarra F; Sassatelli P; Spinato S; Zaffe D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Jan; 28(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 26744027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The treatment of uncoated and titanium nitride-coated abutments with different instruments.
    Mengel R; Meer C; Flores-de-Jacoby L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):232-8. PubMed ID: 15101595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An in vitro study of the treatment of implant surfaces with different instruments.
    Mengel R; Buns CE; Mengel C; Flores-de-Jacoby L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 9509785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of implant surface and instrument insert changes due to instrumentation with different tips for ultrasonic-driven debridement.
    Sahrmann P; Winkler S; Gubler A; Attin T
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Jan; 21(1):25. PubMed ID: 33413296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of scaling a titanium implant surface with metal and plastic instruments: an in vitro study.
    Fox SC; Moriarty JD; Kusy RP
    J Periodontol; 1990 Aug; 61(8):485-90. PubMed ID: 2202807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cell Attachment Following Instrumentation with Titanium and Plastic Instruments, Diode Laser, and Titanium Brush on Titanium, Titanium-Zirconium, and Zirconia Surfaces.
    Lang MS; Cerutis DR; Miyamoto T; Nunn ME
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):799-806. PubMed ID: 27447145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of mechanical instruments on the biocompatibility of titanium dental implants surfaces: a systematic review.
    Louropoulou A; Slot DE; Van der Weijden F
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Jul; 26(7):841-50. PubMed ID: 24641774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of confocal microscopy for quantification of plastic remnants on rough titanium after instrumentation and evaluation of efficacy of removal.
    Yang SM; Park JB; Ko Y
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(3):519-25. PubMed ID: 26009902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Treatment of subgingival implant surfaces with Teflon-coated sonic and ultrasonic scaler tips and various implant curettes. An in vitro study.
    Rühling A; Kocher T; Kreusch J; Plagmann HC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1994 Mar; 5(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 8038341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Instrumentation With Ultrasonic Scalers Facilitates Cleaning of the Sandblasted and Acid-Etched Titanium Implants.
    Park JB; Lee SH; Kim N; Park S; Jin SH; Choi BK; Kim KK; Ko Y
    J Oral Implantol; 2015 Aug; 41(4):419-28. PubMed ID: 24552131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of scaling titanium implant surfaces with metal and plastic instruments on cell attachment.
    Dmytryk JJ; Fox SC; Moriarty JD
    J Periodontol; 1990 Aug; 61(8):491-6. PubMed ID: 2202808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of plastic-covered ultrasonic scalers on titanium implant surfaces.
    Mann M; Parmar D; Walmsley AD; Lea SC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jan; 23(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 21488970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Peri-implantitis cleaning instrumentation influences the integrity of photoactive nanocoatings.
    Kister F; Specht O; Warkentin M; Geis-Gerstorfer J; Rupp F
    Dent Mater; 2017 Feb; 33(2):e69-e78. PubMed ID: 27832905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Treatment of titanium dental implants with three piezoelectric ultrasonic scalers: an in vivo study.
    Kawashima H; Sato S; Kishida M; Yagi H; Matsumoto K; Ito K
    J Periodontol; 2007 Sep; 78(9):1689-94. PubMed ID: 17760537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Treatment with various ultrasonic scaler tips affects efficiency of brushing of SLA titanium discs.
    Park JB; Jang YJ; Choi BK; Kim KK; Ko Y
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Mar; 24(2):e119-23. PubMed ID: 23524804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.