These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31711090)

  • 1. Customized vs Conventional Implant-Supported Immediate Provisional Crowns for Fresh-Socket Implant: A Medium-Term Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study.
    Menchini-Fabris GB; Covani U; Crespi G; Toti P; Brevi B; Crespi R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(6):1505-1511. PubMed ID: 31711090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A 3-year retrospective study of fresh socket implants: CAD/CAM customized healing abutment vs cover screws.
    Menchini-Fabris GB; Crespi R; Toti P; Crespi G; Rubino L; Covani U
    Int J Comput Dent; 2020; 23(2):109-117. PubMed ID: 32555764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prospective evaluation of immediate and delayed provisional single tooth restorations.
    Block MS; Mercante DE; Lirette D; Mohamed W; Ryser M; Castellon P
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Nov; 67(11 Suppl):89-107. PubMed ID: 19835754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Immediate placement and loading of maxillary single-tooth implants: a 3-year prospective study of marginal bone level.
    Berberi AN; Noujeim ZN; Kanj WH; Mearawi RJ; Salameh ZA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Mar; 15(2):202-8. PubMed ID: 25095844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bone Volume Assessment Around Immediate Dental Implant in the Esthetic Area with Immediate Tooth-Like Single Crown Provisionalization: A Laser and Computed Tomography 1-Year Retrospective Study.
    Menchini-Fabris G; Toti P; Covani U; Vatteroni E; Marconcini S; Crespi R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2023 Oct; 38(5):933-942. PubMed ID: 37847835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of different loading protocols on the bone remodeling volume of immediate maxillary single implants: A 2- to 3-year follow-up.
    Crespi R; Fabris GBM; Crespi G; Toti P; Marconcini S; Covani U
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(4):953–962. PubMed ID: 30934043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of implant-abutment interface design on bone and soft tissue levels around immediately placed and restored single-tooth implants: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Pieri F; Aldini NN; Marchetti C; Corinaldesi G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(1):169-78. PubMed ID: 21365053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of surgical and prosthetic techniques on marginal bone loss around titanium implants. Part I: immediate loading in fresh extraction sockets.
    Berberi AN; Tehini GE; Noujeim ZF; Khairallah AA; Abousehlib MN; Salameh ZA
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Oct; 23(7):521-7. PubMed ID: 24750449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. One abutment-one time versus a provisional abutment in immediately loaded post-extractive single implants: a 1-year follow-up of a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
    Grandi T; Guazzi P; Samarani R; Maghaireh H; Grandi G
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2014; 7(2):141-9. PubMed ID: 24977249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nonremoval of immediate abutments in cases involving subcrestally placed postextractive tapered single implants: a randomized controlled clinical study.
    Degidi M; Nardi D; Daprile G; Piattelli A
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2014 Dec; 16(6):794-805. PubMed ID: 23458566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Behaviour of soft tissues healing around single bone-level-implants placed immediately after tooth extraction A 1 year prospective cohort study.
    Lops D; Romeo E; Chiapasco M; Procopio RM; Oteri G
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Nov; 24(11):1206-13. PubMed ID: 22775968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Immediate placement of a porous-tantalum, trabecular metal-enhanced titanium dental implant with demineralized bone matrix into a socket with deficient buccal bone: a clinical report.
    Bencharit S; Byrd WC; Hosseini B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):262-9. PubMed ID: 25702965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Human mineralized bone in extraction sites before implant placement: preliminary results.
    Block MS; Finger I; Lytle R
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2002 Dec; 133(12):1631-8. PubMed ID: 12512662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical and radiologic evaluation of 70 immediately loaded single implants in the maxillary esthetic zone: preliminary results after 1 year of functional loading.
    Di Alberti L; Donnini F; Di Alberti C; Camerino M; Sgaramella N; Lo Muzio L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(1):181-6. PubMed ID: 22299095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Immediate provisional restoration of an implant placed in a fresh primary maxillary canine extraction socket: a case report.
    Turkyilmaz I; Shapiro V
    Gen Dent; 2011; 59(3):e105-9. PubMed ID: 21903530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of PRF and Allograft Use on Immediate Implants at Extraction Sockets with Periapical Infection -Clinical and Cone Beam CT Findings.
    S Medikeri R; Meharwade V; M Wate P; V Lele S
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2018; 59(2):97-109. PubMed ID: 29962426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A short-term clinical evaluation of immediately restored maxillary TiOblast single-tooth implants.
    Norton MR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):274-81. PubMed ID: 15101600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Immediate loading of tapered implants placed in postextraction sockets: retrospective analysis of the 5-year clinical outcome.
    Mura P
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Aug; 14(4):565-74. PubMed ID: 20662861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Immediate provisionalization of single-tooth implants in fresh-extraction sites at the maxillary esthetic zone: up to 6 years of follow-up.
    Mijiritsky E; Mardinger O; Mazor Z; Chaushu G
    Implant Dent; 2009 Aug; 18(4):326-33. PubMed ID: 19667821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of post-implant buccal bone resorption using cone beam computed tomography: a clinical pilot study.
    Vera C; De Kok IJ; Chen W; Reside G; Tyndall D; Cooper LF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(5):1249-57. PubMed ID: 23057042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.