167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31711637)
1. Head-to-head comparison of prostate MRI using an endorectal coil versus a non-endorectal coil: meta-analysis of diagnostic performance in staging T3 prostate cancer.
Tirumani SH; Suh CH; Kim KW; Shinagare AB; Ramaiya NH; Fennessy FM
Clin Radiol; 2020 Feb; 75(2):157.e9-157.e19. PubMed ID: 31711637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prostate cancer: body-array versus endorectal coil MR imaging at 3 T--comparison of image quality, localization, and staging performance.
Heijmink SW; Fütterer JJ; Hambrock T; Takahashi S; Scheenen TW; Huisman HJ; Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa CA; Knipscheer BC; Kiemeney LA; Witjes JA; Barentsz JO
Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):184-95. PubMed ID: 17495178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. T2- and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 3T for the detection of prostate cancer with and without endorectal coil: An intraindividual comparison of image quality and diagnostic performance.
Baur AD; Daqqaq T; Wagner M; Maxeiner A; Huppertz A; Renz D; Hamm B; Fischer T; Durmus T
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 85(6):1075-84. PubMed ID: 27161055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diffusion-weighted MRI of the prostate at 3.0 T: comparison of endorectal coil (ERC) MRI and phased-array coil (PAC) MRI-The impact of SNR on ADC measurement.
Mazaheri Y; Vargas HA; Nyman G; Shukla-Dave A; Akin O; Hricak H
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Oct; 82(10):e515-20. PubMed ID: 23810189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is endorectal coil necessary for the staging of clinically localized prostate cancer? Comparison of non-endorectal versus endorectal MR imaging.
Lee SH; Park KK; Choi KH; Lim BJ; Kim JH; Lee SW; Chung BH
World J Urol; 2010 Dec; 28(6):667-72. PubMed ID: 20623288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prostate cancer: comparison of local staging accuracy of pelvic phased-array coil alone versus integrated endorectal-pelvic phased-array coils. Local staging accuracy of prostate cancer using endorectal coil MR imaging.
Fütterer JJ; Engelbrecht MR; Jager GJ; Hartman RP; King BF; Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa CA; Witjes JA; Barentsz JO
Eur Radiol; 2007 Apr; 17(4):1055-65. PubMed ID: 17024497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prostate MRI using a rigid two-channel phased-array endorectal coil: comparison with phased array coil acquisition at 3 T.
Lewis S; Ganti A; Argiriadi P; Rosen A; Hectors S; Semaan S; Song C; Peti S; Segall M; George K; Jaikaran V; Villa S; Kestenbaum D; Voutsinas N; Doucette J; Tewari A; Rastinehad AR; Taouli B
Cancer Imaging; 2022 Mar; 22(1):15. PubMed ID: 35296357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [MRI staging of prostate cancer with the combined endorectal body phased-array coil and histologic correlation].
Pegios W; Bentas W; Wittmann L; Mack MG; Zangos S; Söllner O; Binder J; Fellbaum C; Jonas D; Vogl TJ
Rofo; 2003 Dec; 175(12):1660-6. PubMed ID: 14661137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Local Staging of Prostate Cancer: A Diagnostic Meta-analysis.
de Rooij M; Hamoen EH; Witjes JA; Barentsz JO; Rovers MM
Eur Urol; 2016 Aug; 70(2):233-45. PubMed ID: 26215604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Volume and landmark analysis: comparison of MRI measurements obtained with an endorectal coil and with a phased-array coil.
Mazaheri Y; Afaq AA; Jung SI; Goldman DA; Wang L; Aslan H; Zelefsky MJ; Akin O; Hricak H
Clin Radiol; 2015 Apr; 70(4):379-86. PubMed ID: 25554540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does endorectal coil MRI increase the accuracy of preoperative prostate cancer staging?
Pooli A; Isharwal S; Cook G; Oliveto JM; LaGrange CA
Can J Urol; 2016 Dec; 23(6):8564-8567. PubMed ID: 27995852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of prostate cancer detection at 3-T MRI with and without an endorectal coil: A prospective, paired-patient study.
Costa DN; Yuan Q; Xi Y; Rofsky NM; Lenkinski RE; Lotan Y; Roehrborn CG; Francis F; Travalini D; Pedrosa I
Urol Oncol; 2016 Jun; 34(6):255.e7-255.e13. PubMed ID: 26971190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of phased-array 3.0-T and endorectal 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of local staging accuracy for prostate cancer.
Park BK; Kim B; Kim CK; Lee HM; Kwon GY
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(4):534-8. PubMed ID: 17882027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of pelvic phased-array versus endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla for local staging of prostate cancer.
Kim BS; Kim TH; Kwon TG; Yoo ES
Yonsei Med J; 2012 May; 53(3):550-6. PubMed ID: 22476999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prostate MRI using an external phased array wearable pelvic coil at 3T: comparison with an endorectal coil.
O'Donohoe RL; Dunne RM; Kimbrell V; Tempany CM
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Mar; 44(3):1062-1069. PubMed ID: 30324501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development and evaluation of a multichannel endorectal RF coil for prostate MRI at 7T in combination with an external surface array.
Ertürk MA; Tian J; Van de Moortele PF; Adriany G; Metzger GJ
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jun; 43(6):1279-87. PubMed ID: 26584144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A multitransmit external body array combined with a
Philips BWJ; van Uden MJ; Rietsch SHG; Orzada S; Scheenen TWJ
Med Phys; 2019 Sep; 46(9):3893-3905. PubMed ID: 31274201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [MRI of prostate cancer using three different coil systems: image quality, tumor detection, and staging].
Beyersdorff D; Darsow U; Stephan C; Schnorr D; Loening S; Taupitz M
Rofo; 2003 Jun; 175(6):799-805. PubMed ID: 12811693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MRI of prostate cancer at 1.5 and 3.0 T: comparison of image quality in tumor detection and staging.
Beyersdorff D; Taymoorian K; Knösel T; Schnorr D; Felix R; Hamm B; Bruhn H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Nov; 185(5):1214-20. PubMed ID: 16247137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance comparison of 1.5-T endorectal coil MRI with 3.0-T nonendorectal coil MRI in patients with prostate cancer.
Shah ZK; Elias SN; Abaza R; Zynger DL; DeRenne LA; Knopp MV; Guo B; Schurr R; Heymsfield SB; Jia G
Acad Radiol; 2015 Apr; 22(4):467-74. PubMed ID: 25579637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
