These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31711847)

  • 1. Analysis of P. aeruginosa disinfectant sensitivity and microbial adhesions to worn cosmetic contact lenses.
    Shen EP; Chu HS; Hsieh YT; Chen WL; Chang SC; Hu FR
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2020 Aug; 43(4):338-344. PubMed ID: 31711847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates to hydrogel contact lens disinfection correlates with cytotoxic activity.
    Lakkis C; Fleiszig SM
    J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Apr; 39(4):1477-86. PubMed ID: 11283074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Disinfection efficacy of contact lens care solutions against ocular pathogens.
    Miller MJ; Callahan DE; McGrath D; Manchester R; Norton SE
    CLAO J; 2001 Jan; 27(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 11215601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The efficacy of povidone-iodine, hydrogen peroxide and a chemical multipurpose contact lens care system against Pseudomonas aeruginosa on various lens case surfaces.
    Yamasaki K; Mizuno Y; Kitamura Y; McCanna DJ; Ngo W; Jones LW
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2021 Feb; 44(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 32115355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Enhancement of Contact Lens Disinfection by Combining Disinfectant with Visible Light Irradiation.
    Hoenes K; Spellerberg B; Hessling M
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Sep; 17(17):. PubMed ID: 32899295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative cytotoxicity potential of soft contact lens care regimens.
    Mowrey-McKee M; Sills A; Wright A;
    CLAO J; 2002 Jul; 28(3):160-4. PubMed ID: 12144238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contact lens disinfecting solutions antibacterial efficacy: comparison between clinical isolates and the standard ISO ATCC strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus.
    Mohammadinia M; Rahmani S; Eslami G; Ghassemi-Broumand M; Aghazadh Amiri M; Aghaie G; Tabatabaee SM; Taheri S; Behgozin A
    Eye (Lond); 2012 Feb; 26(2):327-30. PubMed ID: 22094301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ozone against Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms in contact lenses storage cases.
    Oliver JC; Bredarioli PAP; Leandro FD; Ferreira CBRJ; Veiga SMOM; Dias ALT
    Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo; 2019 Apr; 61():e23. PubMed ID: 31017184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of type III secretion system and lens material on adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to contact lenses.
    Shen EP; Tsay RY; Chia JS; Wu S; Lee JW; Hu FR
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Sep; 53(10):6416-26. PubMed ID: 22918630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Antiviral effect of multipurpose contact lens disinfecting solutions against coronavirus.
    Yasir M; Kumar Vijay A; Willcox M
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2022 Oct; 45(5):101513. PubMed ID: 34465537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Importance of rub and rinse in use of multipurpose contact lens solution.
    Zhu H; Bandara MB; Vijay AK; Masoudi S; Wu D; Willcox MD
    Optom Vis Sci; 2011 Aug; 88(8):967-72. PubMed ID: 21623253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Candida albicans and Pseudomonas aeruginosa adhesion on soft contact lenses.
    Onurdağ FK; Ozkan S; Ozgen S; Olmuş H; Abbasoğlu U
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2011 Apr; 249(4):559-64. PubMed ID: 21170546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Susceptibility of Contact Lens-Related
    Khan M; Stapleton F; Willcox MDP
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2020 Apr; 9(5):2. PubMed ID: 32821474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative antimicrobial efficacy of multi-purpose lens care solutions using the FDA's revised guidance document for industry: stand-alone primary criteria.
    Lever AM; Miller MJ
    CLAO J; 1999 Jan; 25(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 10073638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficacy of contact lens disinfecting solutions against Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
    Manuj K; Gunderson C; Troupe J; Huber ME
    Eye Contact Lens; 2006 Jul; 32(4):216-8. PubMed ID: 16845270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative efficacies of contact lens disinfecting solutions against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
    Amiri MA; Mohammadinia M; Tabatabaee M; Askarizadeh F; Behgozin A
    Clin Exp Optom; 2011 Jul; 94(4):348-51. PubMed ID: 21255080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Microbial adherence to cosmetic contact lenses.
    Chan KY; Cho P; Boost M
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2014 Aug; 37(4):267-72. PubMed ID: 24440107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of cleaning and disinfection of soft contact lenses on corneal infectivity in an animal model.
    Aswad MI; Baum J; Barza M
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1995 Jun; 119(6):738-43. PubMed ID: 7785687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effectiveness of no-rub contact lens cleaning on protein removal: a pilot study.
    Mok KH; Cheung RW; Wong BK; Yip KK; Lee VW
    Optom Vis Sci; 2004 Jun; 81(6):468-70. PubMed ID: 15201721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative efficacies of soft contact lens disinfectant solutions against microbial films in lens cases.
    Wilson LA; Sawant AD; Ahearn DG
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1991 Aug; 109(8):1155-7. PubMed ID: 1867561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.