These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31713416)

  • 1. Balancing Water Dissociation and Current Densities To Enable Sustainable Hydrogen Production with Bipolar Membranes in Microbial Electrolysis Cells.
    Wang X; Rossi R; Yan Z; Yang W; Hickner MA; Mallouk TE; Logan BE
    Environ Sci Technol; 2019 Dec; 53(24):14761-14768. PubMed ID: 31713416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vapor-Fed Cathode Microbial Electrolysis Cells with Closely Spaced Electrodes Enables Greatly Improved Performance.
    Rossi R; Baek G; Logan BE
    Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Jan; 56(2):1211-1220. PubMed ID: 34971515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of single chamber biocatalyzed electrolysis with different types of ion exchange membranes.
    Rozendal RA; Hamelers HV; Molenkamp RJ; Buisman CJ
    Water Res; 2007 May; 41(9):1984-94. PubMed ID: 17343894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance of a continuous flow microbial reverse-electrodialysis electrolysis cell using a non-buffered substrate and catholyte effluent addition.
    Hidayat S; Song YH; Park JY
    Bioresour Technol; 2017 Sep; 240():77-83. PubMed ID: 28314667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Regenerable Nickel-Functionalized Activated Carbon Cathodes Enhanced by Metal Adsorption to Improve Hydrogen Production in Microbial Electrolysis Cells.
    Kim KY; Yang W; Logan BE
    Environ Sci Technol; 2018 Jun; 52(12):7131-7137. PubMed ID: 29845859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hydrophilic porous materials provide efficient gas-liquid separation to advance hydrogen production in microbial electrolysis cells.
    Zhao N; Liang D; Li X; Meng S; Liu H
    Bioresour Technol; 2021 Oct; 337():125352. PubMed ID: 34098503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Concurrent hydrogen production and phosphorus recovery in dual chamber microbial electrolysis cell.
    Almatouq A; Babatunde AO
    Bioresour Technol; 2017 Aug; 237():193-203. PubMed ID: 28254344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hydrogen production from lignocellulosic hydrolysate in an up-scaled microbial electrolysis cell with stacked bio-electrodes.
    Wang L; Long F; Liang D; Xiao X; Liu H
    Bioresour Technol; 2021 Jan; 320(Pt A):124314. PubMed ID: 33147527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hydrogen production using single-chamber membrane-free microbial electrolysis cells.
    Hu H; Fan Y; Liu H
    Water Res; 2008 Sep; 42(15):4172-8. PubMed ID: 18718624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of catalysts and membranes for high yield biohydrogen production via electrohydrogenesis in microbial electrolysis cells (MECs).
    Cheng S; Logan BE
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(4):853-7. PubMed ID: 18776621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Enhanced performance of bioelectrochemical hydrogen production using a pH control strategy.
    Ruiz Y; Baeza JA; Guisasola A
    ChemSusChem; 2015 Jan; 8(2):389-97. PubMed ID: 25469743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of hydrogen production and internal resistance in forward osmosis membrane integrated microbial electrolysis cells.
    Lee MY; Kim KY; Yang E; Kim IS
    Bioresour Technol; 2015; 187():106-112. PubMed ID: 25841189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A study of electron source preference and its impact on hydrogen production in microbial electrolysis cells fed with synthetic fermentation effluent.
    Choi Y; Kim D; Choi H; Cha J; Baek G; Lee C
    Bioengineered; 2023 Dec; 14(1):2244759. PubMed ID: 37598370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Scaling-up up-flow microbial electrolysis cells with a compact electrode configuration for continuous hydrogen production.
    Singh L; Miller AG; Wang L; Liu H
    Bioresour Technol; 2021 Jul; 331():125030. PubMed ID: 33823486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficient H
    Song S; Huang L; Zhou P
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2023 Jan; 107(1):391-404. PubMed ID: 36413265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of the type of ion exchange membrane on performance, ion transport, and pH in biocatalyzed electrolysis of wastewater.
    Rozendal RA; Sleutels TH; Hamelers HV; Buisman CJ
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(11):1757-62. PubMed ID: 18547927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hydrogen production in single-chamber microbial electrolysis cell under high applied voltages.
    Cui W; Lu Y; Zeng C; Yao J; Liu G; Luo H; Zhang R
    Sci Total Environ; 2021 Aug; 780():146597. PubMed ID: 34030325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Application of phase-pure nickel phosphide nanoparticles as cathode catalysts for hydrogen production in microbial electrolysis cells.
    Kim KY; Habas SE; Schaidle JA; Logan BE
    Bioresour Technol; 2019 Dec; 293():122067. PubMed ID: 31499330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of gas atmosphere on hydrogen production in microbial electrolysis cells.
    Cui H; Yang Y; Wang J; Lou Y; Fang A; Liu B; Xie G; Xing D
    Sci Total Environ; 2021 Feb; 756():144154. PubMed ID: 33310211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrochemical struvite precipitation from digestate with a fluidized bed cathode microbial electrolysis cell.
    Cusick RD; Ullery ML; Dempsey BA; Logan BE
    Water Res; 2014 May; 54():297-306. PubMed ID: 24583521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.