170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31713697)
21. Comparative evaluation of different miniplates for internal fixation of mandible fractures using finite element analysis.
Arbag H; Korkmaz HH; Ozturk K; Uyar Y
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jun; 66(6):1225-32. PubMed ID: 18486788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Monocortical miniplate fixation of mandibular angle fractures.
Levy FE; Smith RW; Odland RM; Marentette LJ
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1991 Feb; 117(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 1991053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. One miniplate versus two miniplates in the fixation of mandibular angle fractures. An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
Vitkos EN; Papadopoulos KA; Dimasis P; Weissinger C; Kyrgidis A
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Nov; 123(6):e865-e873. PubMed ID: 35872351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of a single noncompression miniplate versus 2 noncompression miniplates in the treatment of mandibular angle fractures: a prospective, randomized clinical trial.
Danda AK
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 68(7):1565-7. PubMed ID: 20430504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Locking Miniplate Osteosynthesis of Anterior Mandibular Fractures-Quo Vadis?
Desai V; Jain MK
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 May; 77(5):1041.e1-1041.e9. PubMed ID: 30796907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Titanium Lag Screw Versus Miniplate Fixation in the Treatment of Anterior Mandibular Fractures.
Tiwari M; Meshram V; Lambade P; Fernandes G
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 May; 77(5):1031-1039. PubMed ID: 30763527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Fixation of mandibular angle fractures: in vitro biomechanical assessments and computer-based studies.
Chrcanovic BR
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 17(4):251-68. PubMed ID: 23064805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of labial versus labio-inferior lines of osteosynthesis using 3D miniplate for fractures of anterior mandible: A finite element analysis with a pilot clinical trial.
Ponvel K; Panneerselvam E; Balasubramanian S; Krishna Kumar Raja VB
Chin J Traumatol; 2019 Oct; 22(5):261-269. PubMed ID: 31493976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Experimental studies of the biomechanical stability of different miniplate configurations for the mandibular angle].
Schierle HP; Schmelzeisen R; Rahn B
Fortschr Kiefer Gesichtschir; 1996; 41():166-70. PubMed ID: 8755434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Three-dimensional v/s standard titanium miniplate fixation in the management of mandibular fractures--a randomized clinical study.
Sehgal S; Ramanujam L; Prasad K; Krishnappa R
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 42(7):1292-9. PubMed ID: 24780350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Combination of microplate and miniplate for osteosynthesis of mandibular fractures: an experimental study.
Feller KU; Richter G; Schneider M; Eckelt U
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Feb; 31(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 11936405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Biomechanical study of rigid internal fixation for mandibular angle fracture].
Wang H; Chen MS; Tang W; Tian WD
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Oct; 24(5):393-6. PubMed ID: 17315643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Efficacy of Microplates versus Miniplates in the Management of Maxillofacial Fractures.
Mittal G; Agarwal A; Garg R; Sharma S; Rathi A; Kapse P
Ann Maxillofac Surg; 2020; 10(1):31-36. PubMed ID: 32855911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A biomechanical analysis of titanium miniplates used for treatment of mandibular symphyseal fractures with the finite element method.
Ji B; Wang C; Liu L; Long J; Tian W; Wang H
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Mar; 109(3):e21-7. PubMed ID: 20219581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Fracture line stability as a function of the internal fixation system: an in vitro comparison using a mandibular angle fracture model.
Shetty V; McBrearty D; Fourney M; Caputo AA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1995 Jul; 53(7):791-801; discussion 801-2. PubMed ID: 7595794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Biomechanical evaluation of malleable noncompression miniplates in mandibular angle fractures: an experimental study.
Esen A; Dolanmaz D; Tüz HH
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jul; 50(5):e65-8. PubMed ID: 22118919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Is "Bite force" a reliable parameter to compare masticatory efficiency restoration following ORIF of anterior mandibular fractures?
Patel S; Bhimani K; Narsingyani R; Bhatti Z; Savani R
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res; 2022; 12(6):777-781. PubMed ID: 36159067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Three-dimensional titanium miniplates for fixation of subcondylar mandibular fractures: Comparison of five designs using patient-specific finite element analysis.
Albogha MH; Mori Y; Takahashi I
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Mar; 46(3):391-397. PubMed ID: 29311022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Biomechanical evaluation of Le Fort I maxillary fracture plating techniques.
Wang H; Chen MS; Fan YB; Tang W; Tian WD
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jun; 65(6):1109-16. PubMed ID: 17517293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A retrospective comparative study of mandibular fracture treatment with internal fixation using reconstruction plate versus miniplates.
Sukegawa S; Kanno T; Masui M; Sukegawa-Takahashi Y; Kishimoto T; Sato A; Furuki Y
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Aug; 47(8):1175-1180. PubMed ID: 31288966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
