These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31714104)

  • 21. Intermittent faking of personality profiles in high-stakes assessments: A grade of membership analysis.
    Brown A; Böckenholt U
    Psychol Methods; 2022 Oct; 27(5):895-916. PubMed ID: 35007104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Variance in faking across noncognitive measures.
    McFarland LA; Ryan AM
    J Appl Psychol; 2000 Oct; 85(5):812-21. PubMed ID: 11055152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Testing the efficacy of a new procedure for reducing faking on personality tests within selection contexts.
    Fan J; Gao D; Carroll SA; Lopez FJ; Tian TS; Meng H
    J Appl Psychol; 2012 Jul; 97(4):866-80. PubMed ID: 22250667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Faking Good on Self-Reports Versus Informant-Reports of Emotional Intelligence.
    Walker SA; MacCann C
    Assessment; 2024 Jul; 31(5):1011-1019. PubMed ID: 37837364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Personnel selection as a signaling game.
    Bangerter A; Roulin N; König CJ
    J Appl Psychol; 2012 Jul; 97(4):719-38. PubMed ID: 22040263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparing forced-choice and single-stimulus personality scores on a level playing field: A meta-analysis of psychometric properties and susceptibility to faking.
    Speer AB; Wegmeyer LJ; Tenbrink AP; Delacruz AY; Christiansen ND; Salim RM
    J Appl Psychol; 2023 Nov; 108(11):1812-1833. PubMed ID: 37326537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Controlling social desirability may attenuate faking effects: a study with aggression measures.
    Anguiano-Carrasco C; Vigil-Colet A; Ferrando PJ
    Psicothema; 2013; 25(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 23628529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Self-presentation dynamics on overt integrity tests: experimental studies of the Reid Report.
    Cunningham MR; Wong DT; Barbee AP
    J Appl Psychol; 1994 Oct; 79(5):643-58. PubMed ID: 7989274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Psychometric Costs of Applicants' Faking: Examining Measurement Invariance and Retest Correlations Across Response Conditions.
    Krammer G; Sommer M; Arendasy ME
    J Pers Assess; 2017; 99(5):510-523. PubMed ID: 28300431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Analysis of a brief biodata scale as a predictor of job performance and its incremental validity over the Big Five and Dark Tetrad personality traits.
    Ramos-Villagrasa PJ; Fernández-Del-Río E; Castro Á
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(9):e0274878. PubMed ID: 36178891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The "g" in Faking: Doublethink the Validity of Personality Self-Report Measures for Applicant Selection.
    Geiger M; Olderbak S; Sauter R; Wilhelm O
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2153. PubMed ID: 30483179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The nonlinear relationship between atypical applicant experience and hiring: The red flags perspective.
    Wechtler HM; Lee CISG; Heyden MLM; Felps W; Lee TW
    J Appl Psychol; 2022 May; 107(5):776-794. PubMed ID: 34591559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Modeling Faking in the Multidimensional Forced-Choice Format: The Faking Mixture Model.
    Frick S
    Psychometrika; 2022 Jun; 87(2):773-794. PubMed ID: 34927219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Measuring faking in the employment interview: development and validation of an interview faking behavior scale.
    Levashina J; Campion MA
    J Appl Psychol; 2007 Nov; 92(6):1638-56. PubMed ID: 18020802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Is the implicit association test immune to faking?
    Steffens MC
    Exp Psychol; 2004; 51(3):165-79. PubMed ID: 15267125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. APPLICANTS' STRATEGIC USE OF EXTREME OR MIDPOINT RESPONSES WHEN FAKING PERSONALITY TESTS.
    König CJ; Mura M; Schmidt J
    Psychol Rep; 2015 Oct; 117(2):429-36. PubMed ID: 26444843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Preliminary Evidence of the Role of Medial Prefrontal Cortex in Self-Enhancement: A Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study.
    Taylor-Lillquist B; Kanpa V; Crawford M; El Filali M; Oakes J; Jonasz A; Disney A; Keenan JP
    Brain Sci; 2020 Aug; 10(8):. PubMed ID: 32784394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Substance versus style: a new look at social desirability in motivating contexts.
    Smith DB; Ellingson JE
    J Appl Psychol; 2002 Apr; 87(2):211-9. PubMed ID: 12002950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assessing personality with a structured employment interview: construct-related validity and susceptibility to response inflation.
    Van Iddekinge CH; Raymark PH; Roth PL
    J Appl Psychol; 2005 May; 90(3):536-52. PubMed ID: 15910148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Can Faking Be Measured With Dedicated Validity Scales? Within-Subject Trifactor Mixture Modeling Applied to BIDR Responses.
    Guenole N; Brown A; Lim V
    Assessment; 2023 Jul; 30(5):1523-1542. PubMed ID: 35786013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.