These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31714104)

  • 61. Nothing but the truth? Effects of faking on the validity of the crosswise model.
    Hoffmann A; Meisters J; Musch J
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(10):e0258603. PubMed ID: 34714838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Personnel selection and the five-factor model: reexamining the effects of appplicant's frame of reference.
    Smith DB; Hanges PJ; Dickson MW
    J Appl Psychol; 2001 Apr; 86(2):304-15. PubMed ID: 11393442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. A meta-analysis of the relationship between individual assessments and job performance.
    Morris SB; Daisley RL; Wheeler M; Boyer P
    J Appl Psychol; 2015 Jan; 100(1):5-20. PubMed ID: 24865578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Reconsidering vocational interests for personnel selection: the validity of an interest-based selection test in relation to job knowledge, job performance, and continuance intentions.
    Van Iddekinge CH; Putka DJ; Campbell JP
    J Appl Psychol; 2011 Jan; 96(1):13-33. PubMed ID: 20919794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Job context, selection decision outcome, and the perceived fairness of selection tests: biodata as an illustrative case.
    Elkins TJ; Phillips JS
    J Appl Psychol; 2000 Jun; 85(3):479-84. PubMed ID: 10900821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Self-regulation during job search: the opposing effects of employment self-efficacy and job search behavior self-efficacy.
    Liu S; Wang M; Liao H; Shi J
    J Appl Psychol; 2014 Nov; 99(6):1159-72. PubMed ID: 24773401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Controlling for Response Bias in Self-Ratings of Personality: A Comparison of Impression Management Scales and the Overclaiming Technique.
    Müller S; Moshagen M
    J Pers Assess; 2019; 101(3):229-236. PubMed ID: 29648894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Job search and employment: a personality-motivational analysis and meta-analytic review.
    Kanfer R; Wanberg CR; Kantrowitz TM
    J Appl Psychol; 2001 Oct; 86(5):837-55. PubMed ID: 11596801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Applicants' preference for impression management tactic in employment interviews by Transportation Security Administration.
    Scudder JN; Lamude KG
    Psychol Rep; 2009 Apr; 104(2):403-6. PubMed ID: 19610468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Individual Difference Variables and the Occurrence and Effectiveness of Faking Behavior in Interviews.
    Buehl AK; Melchers KG
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():686. PubMed ID: 28539895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Examining mental health literacy and its correlates using the overclaiming technique.
    Swami V; Papanicolaou A; Furnham A
    Br J Psychol; 2011 Aug; 102(3):662-75. PubMed ID: 21752013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Overclaiming responsibility in fictitious countries: Unpacking the role of availability in support theory predictions of overclaiming.
    Ross MQ; Sterling-Maisel OA; Tracy O; Putnam AL
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Nov; 48(8):1346-1358. PubMed ID: 32562248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Individual differences in faking integrity tests.
    Brown RD; Cothern CM
    Psychol Rep; 2002 Dec; 91(3 Pt 1):691-702. PubMed ID: 12530710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. The Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Application Process: An Analysis of the Applicant Experience.
    Ramkumar PN; Navarro SM; Chughtai M; Haeberle HS; Taylor SA; Mont MA
    J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2018 Aug; 26(15):537-544. PubMed ID: 29870416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Evaluation of warning strategies to reduce faking during military recruitment.
    Feeney JR; Goffin RD; Kemp C; Beshai S; Klammer JD
    Mil Psychol; 2023 Aug; ():1-11. PubMed ID: 37640383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Forced-choice assessments of personality for selection: evaluating issues of normative assessment and faking resistance.
    Heggestad ED; Morrison M; Reeve CL; McCloy RA
    J Appl Psychol; 2006 Jan; 91(1):9-24. PubMed ID: 16435935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Effects of impression management and self-deception on the predictive validity of personality constructs.
    Barrick MR; Mount MK
    J Appl Psychol; 1996 Jun; 81(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 8690688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Prediction of job search intentions and behaviors: Testing the social cognitive model of career self-management.
    Lim RH; Lent RW; Penn LT
    J Couns Psychol; 2016 Oct; 63(5):594-603. PubMed ID: 27089060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Understanding and controlling response bias in needs assessment studies.
    Calsyn RJ; Winter JP
    Eval Rev; 1999 Aug; 23(4):399-417. PubMed ID: 10558393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Are applicants more likely to quit longer assessments? Examining the effect of assessment length on applicant attrition behavior.
    Hardy JH; Gibson C; Sloan M; Carr A
    J Appl Psychol; 2017 Jul; 102(7):1148-1158. PubMed ID: 28333499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.