1194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31714366)
1. In primary lymph nodal staging of patients with high-risk and intermediate-risk prostate cancer, how critical is the role of Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-computed tomography?
Kulkarni SC; Sundaram PS; Padma S
Nucl Med Commun; 2020 Feb; 41(2):139-146. PubMed ID: 31714366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Histological comparison between predictive value of preoperative 3-T multiparametric MRI and
Franklin A; Yaxley WJ; Raveenthiran S; Coughlin G; Gianduzzo T; Kua B; McEwan L; Wong D; Delahunt B; Egevad L; Samaratunga H; Brown N; Parkinson R; Roberts MJ; Yaxley JW
BJU Int; 2021 Jan; 127(1):71-79. PubMed ID: 32524748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How accurate is
Erdem S; Simsek DH; Degirmenci E; Aydin R; Bagbudar S; Ozluk Y; Sanli Y; Sanli O; Ozcan F
Urol Oncol; 2022 Jan; 40(1):6.e1-6.e9. PubMed ID: 34400066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of preoperative locoregional Ga-68 PSMA-11 PET-CT and mp-MRI results with postoperative histopathology of prostate cancer.
Yilmaz B; Turkay R; Colakoglu Y; Baytekin HF; Ergul N; Sahin S; Tugcu V; Inci E; Tasci AI; Cermik TF
Prostate; 2019 Jun; 79(9):1007-1017. PubMed ID: 31012125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of
Zhang Q; Zang S; Zhang C; Fu Y; Lv X; Zhang Q; Deng Y; Zhang C; Luo R; Zhao X; Wang W; Wang F; Guo H
J Transl Med; 2017 Nov; 15(1):230. PubMed ID: 29115970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7.
von Eyben FE; Picchio M; von Eyben R; Rhee H; Bauman G
Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Sep; 4(5):686-693. PubMed ID: 28753806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Outcomes of Primary Lymph Node Staging of Intermediate and High Risk Prostate Cancer with
Yaxley JW; Raveenthiran S; Nouhaud FX; Samartunga H; Yaxley AJ; Coughlin G; Delahunt B; Egevad L; McEwan L; Wong D
J Urol; 2019 Apr; 201(4):815-820. PubMed ID: 30672842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9.
Esen T; Falay O; Tarim K; Armutlu A; Koseoglu E; Kilic M; Seymen H; Sarikaya AF; Kiremit MC; Balbay MD; Canda AE; Baydar DE; Kordan Y; Demirkol MO; Tilki D
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Mar; 7(2):288-293. PubMed ID: 33509671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Incremental Impact of [
Szigeti F; Schweighofer-Zwink G; Meissnitzer M; Hauser-Kronberger C; Hitzl W; Kunit T; Forstner R; Pirich C; Beheshti M
Mol Imaging Biol; 2022 Feb; 24(1):50-59. PubMed ID: 34519966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and multiparametric MRI for staging of high-risk prostate cancer68Ga-PSMA PET and MRI in prostate cancer.
Tulsyan S; Das CJ; Tripathi M; Seth A; Kumar R; Bal C
Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Dec; 38(12):1094-1102. PubMed ID: 28957842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12.
Kopp J; Kopp D; Bernhardt E; Manka L; Beck A; Gerullis H; Karakiewicz P; Schoerner W; Hammerer P; Schiffmann J
World J Urol; 2020 Dec; 38(12):3085-3090. PubMed ID: 32103332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Primary lymph-node staging with
Corona-Montes VE; González-Cuenca E; Fernández-Noyola G; Olarte-Casas MA; Bobadilla-Salazar D; Medrano-Urtecho HM; Asimakopoulos AD
Urol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 39(8):494.e1-494.e6. PubMed ID: 33223371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Modelling Study with an Interactive Model Assessing the Cost-effectiveness of
Scholte M; Barentsz JO; Sedelaar JPM; Gotthardt M; Grutters JPC; Rovers MM
Eur Urol Focus; 2020 Sep; 6(5):967-974. PubMed ID: 30826284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15.
Klingenberg S; Jochumsen MR; Ulhøi BP; Fredsøe J; Sørensen KD; Borre M; Bouchelouche K
J Nucl Med; 2021 Feb; 62(2):214-220. PubMed ID: 32444374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lymph node staging with 68Ga-PSMA PET in patients with intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer suitable for radical prostatectomy managed in a prostate cancer unit.
Maestroni UV; Campobasso D; Guarino G; Acampora A; Scarlattei M; Ziglioli F; Dinale F; Baldari G; Migliari S; Gasparro D; Ferretti S; Silini EM; Ruffini L
Chin Clin Oncol; 2023 Jun; 12(3):22. PubMed ID: 37417288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17.
Herlemann A; Wenter V; Kretschmer A; Thierfelder KM; Bartenstein P; Faber C; Gildehaus FJ; Stief CG; Gratzke C; Fendler WP
Eur Urol; 2016 Oct; 70(4):553-557. PubMed ID: 26810345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Gallium-68-prostate-specific membrane antigen (
van Leeuwen PJ; Donswijk M; Nandurkar R; Stricker P; Ho B; Heijmink S; Wit EMK; Tillier C; van Muilenkom E; Nguyen Q; van der Poel HG; Emmett L
BJU Int; 2019 Jul; 124(1):62-68. PubMed ID: 30074667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19.
Hruby G; Eade T; Emmett L; Ho B; Hsiao E; Schembri G; Guo L; Kwong C; Hunter J; Byrne K; Kneebone A
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol; 2018 Aug; 14(4):343-346. PubMed ID: 29663686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic Accuracy of Multiparametric MRI versus
Muehlematter UJ; Burger IA; Becker AS; Schawkat K; Hötker AM; Reiner CS; Müller J; Rupp NJ; Rüschoff JH; Eberli D; Donati OF
Radiology; 2019 Nov; 293(2):350-358. PubMed ID: 31502937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
