BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31715149)

  • 1. Survival outcomes for robotic-assisted laparoscopy versus traditional laparoscopy in clinical stage I epithelial ovarian cancer.
    Facer B; Wang F; Grijalva CG; Alvarez RD; Shu XO
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 May; 222(5):474.e1-474.e12. PubMed ID: 31715149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Incorporating robotic surgery into the management of ovarian cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
    Abitbol J; Gotlieb W; Zeng Z; Ramanakumar A; Kessous R; Kogan L; Pare-Miron V; Rombaldi M; Salvador S; Kucukyazici B; Brin S; How J; Lau S
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Nov; 29(9):1341-1347. PubMed ID: 31601648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial.
    Mäenpää MM; Nieminen K; Tomás EI; Laurila M; Luukkaala TH; Mäenpää JU
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):588.e1-588.e7. PubMed ID: 27288987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Conversion to open surgery during minimally invasive esophagectomy portends worse short-term outcomes: an analysis of the National Cancer Database.
    Halpern AL; Friedman C; Torphy RJ; Al-Musawi MH; Mitchell JD; Scott CD; Meguid RA; McCarter MD; Weyant MJ; Gleisner AL
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Aug; 34(8):3470-3478. PubMed ID: 31591657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Single-Site Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Staging Surgery for Presumed Clinically Early-Stage Ovarian Cancer.
    Yoo JG; Kim WJ; Lee KH
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(3):380-381. PubMed ID: 28911827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does surgical platform impact recurrence and survival? A study of utilization of multiport, single-port, and robotic-assisted laparoscopy in endometrial cancer surgery.
    Chambers LM; Carr C; Freeman L; Jernigan AM; Michener CM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Sep; 221(3):243.e1-243.e11. PubMed ID: 31075245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laparoscopic staging for apparent stage I epithelial ovarian cancer.
    Melamed A; Keating NL; Clemmer JT; Bregar AJ; Wright JD; Boruta DM; Schorge JO; Del Carmen MG; Rauh-Hain JA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):50.e1-50.e12. PubMed ID: 27567562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of perioperative outcomes and cost between robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopy for transperitoneal infrarenal para-aortic lymphadenectomy (TIPAL).
    Coronado PJ; Fasero M; Magrina JF; Herraiz MA; Vidart JA
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(4):674-81. PubMed ID: 24486680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Same-day discharge is feasible and safe in patients undergoing minimally invasive staging for gynecologic malignancies.
    Penner KR; Fleming ND; Barlavi L; Axtell AE; Lentz SE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):186.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25132462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robotic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer: A National Perspective on Short-term Oncologic Outcomes.
    Speicher PJ; Englum BR; Ganapathi AM; Nussbaum DP; Mantyh CR; Migaly J
    Ann Surg; 2015 Dec; 262(6):1040-5. PubMed ID: 25405559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Incidence, associated risk factors, and impact of conversion to laparotomy in elective minimally invasive sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease.
    Bastawrous AL; Landmann RG; Liu Y; Liu E; Cleary RK
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Feb; 34(2):598-609. PubMed ID: 31062152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Oncological outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open lateral lymph node dissection for locally advanced low rectal cancer.
    Yamaguchi T; Kinugasa Y; Shiomi A; Kagawa H; Yamakawa Y; Furutani A; Manabe S; Yamaoka Y; Hino H
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Nov; 32(11):4498-4505. PubMed ID: 29721748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Indications and techniques for robotic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in gynecologic oncology.
    Wisner KP; Gupta S; Ahmad S; Holloway RW
    J Surg Oncol; 2015 Dec; 112(7):782-9. PubMed ID: 26288990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Laparoendoscopic Single-site Surgery for Comprehensive Staging of Early Ovarian Cancer.
    Chen S; Qi X; Chen L; Yi Q; Dong S; Xu L; Zheng Y
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(5):806. PubMed ID: 30278233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Effects of robotic and laparoscopic-assisted surgery on lymph node dissection and short-term outcomes in patients with Siewert II adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction].
    Wang D; Cao S; Tan X; Liu S; Liu X; Niu Z; Chen D; Wang D; Zhang J; Lv L; Li Y; Jiang H; Guo D; Li Y; Li Z; Zhou Y
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Feb; 22(2):156-163. PubMed ID: 30799538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of robotic approach, laparoscopic approach and laparotomy in treating epithelial ovarian cancer.
    Chen CH; Chiu LH; Chen HH; Chan C; Liu WM
    Int J Med Robot; 2016 Jun; 12(2):268-75. PubMed ID: 25808671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of clinical and economic outcomes between robotic, laparoscopic, and open rectal cancer surgery: early experience at a tertiary care center.
    Ramji KM; Cleghorn MC; Josse JM; MacNeill A; O'Brien C; Urbach D; Quereshy FA
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Apr; 30(4):1337-43. PubMed ID: 26173546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Grading evaluation of operative complications and analysis of related risk factors in patients with stage Ⅰ endometrial cancer treated by robotic-assisted and traditional laparoscopic surgery].
    Guo RX; Du JM; Wang PR; Li BJ; Li LX; Wang Q; Bai J
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Feb; 55(2):112-119. PubMed ID: 32146740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.
    Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Impact of Conversion to Laparotomy in Rectal Cancer : A National Cancer Database Analysis of 57 574 Patients.
    Parascandola SA; Hota S; Tampo MMT; Sparks AD; Obias V
    Am Surg; 2020 Jul; 86(7):811-818. PubMed ID: 32683917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.