218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3171642)
1. Effect of electrical stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle on temporary threshold shifts in auditory sensitivity. II. Dependence on the level of temporary threshold shifts.
Rajan R
J Neurophysiol; 1988 Aug; 60(2):569-79. PubMed ID: 3171642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of electrical stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle on temporary threshold shifts in auditory sensitivity. I. Dependence on electrical stimulation parameters.
Rajan R
J Neurophysiol; 1988 Aug; 60(2):549-68. PubMed ID: 3171641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Binaural acoustic stimulation exercises protective effects at the cochlea that mimic the effects of electrical stimulation of an auditory efferent pathway.
Rajan R; Johnstone BM
Brain Res; 1988 Sep; 459(2):241-55. PubMed ID: 3179705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Electrical stimulation of cochlear efferents at the round window reduces auditory desensitization in guinea pigs. II. Dependence on level of temporary threshold shifts.
Rajan R; Johnstone BM
Hear Res; 1988 Oct; 36(1):75-88. PubMed ID: 3198522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of crossed olivo-cochlear bundle stimulation on acoustic trauma.
Takeyama M; Kusakari J; Nishikawa N; Wada T
Acta Otolaryngol; 1992; 112(2):205-9. PubMed ID: 1604980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Electrical stimulation of the inferior colliculus at low rates protects the cochlea from auditory desensitization.
Rajan R
Brain Res; 1990 Jan; 506(2):192-204. PubMed ID: 1967964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of electrical stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle on auditory nerve response to tones in noise.
Winslow RL; Sachs MB
J Neurophysiol; 1987 Apr; 57(4):1002-21. PubMed ID: 3585452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Electrical stimulation of cochlear efferents at the round window reduces auditory desensitization in guinea pigs. I. Dependence on electrical stimulation parameters.
Rajan R; Johnstone BM
Hear Res; 1988 Oct; 36(1):53-73. PubMed ID: 3198521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contralateral cochlear destruction mediates protection from monoaural loud sound exposures through the crossed olivocochlear bundle.
Rajan R; Johnstone BM
Hear Res; 1989 Jun; 39(3):263-77. PubMed ID: 2753831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Masked cochlear whole-nerve response intensity functions altered by electrical stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle.
Dolan DF; Nuttall AL
J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Mar; 83(3):1081-6. PubMed ID: 3356813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of electrical stimulation of medial olivocochlear neurons on ipsilateral and contralateral cochlear responses.
Gifford ML; Guinan JJ
Hear Res; 1987; 29(2-3):179-94. PubMed ID: 3624082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. New data on the short-term effects of tone exposure.
Botte MC; Mönikheim S
J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 May; 95(5 Pt 1):2598-605. PubMed ID: 8207131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of asphyxia and aminooxyacetic acid on the slow potential evoked by crossed olivocochlear bundle stimulation.
Bobbin RP; Bledsoe SC; Chihal DM
Hear Res; 1981 Nov; 5(2-3):265-9. PubMed ID: 7309641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tonic activity of the crossed olivocochlear bundle in guinea pigs with idiopathic losses in auditory sensitivity.
Rajan R
Hear Res; 1989 Jun; 39(3):299-308. PubMed ID: 2753834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Neuronal responses in cat primary auditory cortex to electrical cochlear stimulation. I. Intensity dependence of firing rate and response latency.
Raggio MW; Schreiner CE
J Neurophysiol; 1994 Nov; 72(5):2334-59. PubMed ID: 7884463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efferent-mediated protection from acoustic overexposure: relation to slow effects of olivocochlear stimulation.
Reiter ER; Liberman MC
J Neurophysiol; 1995 Feb; 73(2):506-14. PubMed ID: 7760114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Antimasking effects of the olivocochlear reflex. II. Enhancement of auditory-nerve response to masked tones.
Kawase T; Delgutte B; Liberman MC
J Neurophysiol; 1993 Dec; 70(6):2533-49. PubMed ID: 8120597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Frequency and loss dependence of the protective effects of the olivocochlear pathways in cats.
Rajan R
J Neurophysiol; 1995 Aug; 74(2):598-615. PubMed ID: 7472367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does electrical stimulation of the crossed olivo-cochlear bundle produce movement of the organ of Corti?
Patuzzi R; Rajan R
Hear Res; 1990 Apr; 45(1-2):15-32. PubMed ID: 2345114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of upper pontine transections on normal cochlear responses and on the protective effects of contralateral acoustic stimulation in barbiturate-anaesthetized normal-hearing guinea pigs.
Rajan R
Hear Res; 1990 Apr; 45(1-2):137-44. PubMed ID: 2345112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
