These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31717610)

  • 1. Fracture Resistance of Partial Indirect Restorations Made With CAD/CAM Technology. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Amesti-Garaizabal A; Agustín-Panadero R; Verdejo-Solá B; Fons-Font A; Fernández-Estevan L; Montiel-Company J; Solá-Ruíz MF
    J Clin Med; 2019 Nov; 8(11):. PubMed ID: 31717610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical performance of resin-matrix ceramic partial coverage restorations: a systematic review.
    Fathy H; Hamama HH; El-Wassefy N; Mahmoud SH
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 May; 26(5):3807-3822. PubMed ID: 35320383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Survival Rate of Resin and Ceramic Inlays, Onlays, and Overlays: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Morimoto S; Rebello de Sampaio FB; Braga MM; Sesma N; Özcan M
    J Dent Res; 2016 Aug; 95(9):985-94. PubMed ID: 27287305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative evaluation of clinical performance of ceramic and resin inlays, onlays, and overlays: A systematic review and meta analysis.
    Naik VB; Jain AK; Rao RD; Naik BD
    J Conserv Dent; 2022; 25(4):347-355. PubMed ID: 36187858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical Behavior of Ceramic, Hybrid and Composite Onlays. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Bustamante-Hernández N; Montiel-Company JM; Bellot-Arcís C; Mañes-Ferrer JF; Solá-Ruíz MF; Agustín-Panadero R; Fernández-Estevan L
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Oct; 17(20):. PubMed ID: 33086485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of manufacturing methods on the survival rate of ceramic and indirect composite restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Sampaio FBWR; Özcan M; Gimenez TC; Moreira MSNA; Tedesco TK; Morimoto S
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2019 Nov; 31(6):561-571. PubMed ID: 31840412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical evaluation of chairside Computer Assisted Design/Computer Assisted Machining nano-ceramic restorations: Five-year status.
    Fasbinder DJ; Neiva GF; Heys D; Heys R
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2020 Mar; 32(2):193-203. PubMed ID: 31393651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computer-aided direct ceramic restorations: a 10-year prospective clinical study of Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays.
    Otto T; De Nisco S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 11951800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Retrospective clinical evaluation of ceramic onlays placed by dental students.
    Archibald JJ; Santos GC; Moraes Coelho Santos MJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 May; 119(5):743-748.e1. PubMed ID: 28927922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The longevity of direct and indirect posterior restorations is uncertain and may be affected by a number of dentist-, patient-, and material-related factors.
    Goldstein GR
    J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2010 Mar; 10(1):30-1. PubMed ID: 20230962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays.
    Hannig C; Westphal C; Becker K; Attin T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 16198171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of cavity preparation design and ceramic type on the stress distribution, strain and fracture resistance of CAD/CAM onlays in molars.
    Vianna ALSV; Prado CJD; Bicalho AA; Pereira RADS; Neves FDD; Soares CJ
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2018; 26():e20180004. PubMed ID: 30133672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fracture resistance of prepared premolars restored with bonded new lab composite and all-ceramic inlay/onlay restorations: Laboratory study.
    Wafaie RA; Ibrahim Ali A; Mahmoud SH
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2018 May; 30(3):229-239. PubMed ID: 29368375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fracture Resistance of CAD/CAM-Fabricated Lithium Disilicate MOD Inlays and Onlays with Various Cavity Preparation Designs.
    Yoon HI; Sohn PJ; Jin S; Elani H; Lee SJ
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e524-e529. PubMed ID: 29533499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fracture Rates and Lifetime Estimations of CAD/CAM All-ceramic Restorations.
    Belli R; Petschelt A; Hofner B; Hajtó J; Scherrer SS; Lohbauer U
    J Dent Res; 2016 Jan; 95(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 26428908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of restorative material and proximal cavity design on the fracture resistance of MOD inlay restoration.
    Liu X; Fok A; Li H
    Dent Mater; 2014 Mar; 30(3):327-33. PubMed ID: 24424091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fracture resistance of manually and CAD/CAM manufactured ceramic onlays.
    Yildiz C; Vanlıoğlu BA; Evren B; Uludamar A; Kulak-Ozkan Y
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Oct; 22(7):537-542. PubMed ID: 23758595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of different cavity preparation designs on fracture resistance of onlay and overlay restorations using different CAD/CAM materials.
    Ön Salman G; Tacír ƔH; Polat ZS; Salman A
    Am J Dent; 2017 Jun; 30(3):165-170. PubMed ID: 29178763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fracture load of CAD/CAM-fabricated and 3D-printed composite crowns as a function of material thickness.
    Zimmermann M; Ender A; Egli G; Özcan M; Mehl A
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Jun; 23(6):2777-2784. PubMed ID: 30368664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance of direct and indirect onlay restorations for structurally compromised teeth.
    Althaqafi KA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 37696748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.