These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31718908)

  • 1. Experimentally based pore network modeling of NAPL dissolution process in heterogeneous porous media.
    Khasi S; Ramezanzadeh M; Ghazanfari MH
    J Contam Hydrol; 2020 Jan; 228():103565. PubMed ID: 31718908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sherwood correlation for dissolution of pooled NAPL in porous media.
    Aydin Sarikurt D; Gokdemir C; Copty NK
    J Contam Hydrol; 2017 Nov; 206():67-74. PubMed ID: 29033219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dissolution and remobilization of NAPL in surfactant-enhanced aquifer remediation from microscopic scale simulations.
    Ramezanzadeh M; Aminnaji M; Rezanezhad F; Ghazanfari MH; Babaei M
    Chemosphere; 2022 Feb; 289():133177. PubMed ID: 34890610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Remediation of trapped DNAPL enhanced by SDS surfactant and silica nanoparticles in heterogeneous porous media: experimental data and empirical models.
    Ramezanzadeh M; Khasi S; Fatemi M; Ghazanfari MH
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Jan; 27(3):2658-2669. PubMed ID: 31836978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measured mass transfer coefficients in porous media using specific interfacial area.
    Cho J; Annable MD; Rao PS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2005 Oct; 39(20):7883-8. PubMed ID: 16295851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of nonionic surfactant partitioning on the dissolution kinetics of residual perchloroethylene in a model porous medium.
    Sharmin R; Ioannidis MA; Legge RL
    J Contam Hydrol; 2006 Jan; 82(1-2):145-64. PubMed ID: 16274842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Simple screening models of NAPL dissolution in the subsurface.
    Zhu J; Sykes JF
    J Contam Hydrol; 2004 Aug; 72(1-4):245-58. PubMed ID: 15240175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of theory and experiment for NAPL dissolution in porous media.
    Bahar T; Golfier F; Oltéan C; Lefevre E; Lorgeoux C
    J Contam Hydrol; 2018 Apr; 211():49-64. PubMed ID: 29573829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of soil moisture dynamics on dense nonaqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) spill zone architecture in heterogeneous porous media.
    Yoon H; Valocchi AJ; Werth CJ
    J Contam Hydrol; 2007 Mar; 90(3-4):159-83. PubMed ID: 17184872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modeling Dissolution of Soluble Compounds from Multicomponent NAPL Using a Desorption Approximation.
    Gefell MJ; Gurung D
    Ground Water; 2023; 61(6):879-886. PubMed ID: 36938632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A practical model for mobile, residual, and entrapped NAPL in water-wet porous media.
    White MD; Oostrom M; Lenhard RJ
    Ground Water; 2004; 42(5):734-46. PubMed ID: 15457796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Laboratory-scale experiments and numerical modeling of cosolvent flushing of multi-component NAPLs in saturated porous media.
    Agaoglu B; Scheytt T; Copty NK
    J Contam Hydrol; 2012 Oct; 140-141():80-94. PubMed ID: 23010548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of source zone heterogeneity on surfactant-enhanced NAPL dissolution and resulting remediation end-points.
    Saenton S; Illangasekare TH; Soga K; Saba TA
    J Contam Hydrol; 2002 Nov; 59(1-2):27-44. PubMed ID: 12683638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Etched glass micromodel for laboratory simulation of NAPL recovery mechanisms by surfactant solutions in fractured rock.
    Martel R; Portois C; Robert T; Uyeda M
    J Contam Hydrol; 2019 Dec; 227():103550. PubMed ID: 31493908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Experiments and sensitivity coefficients analysis for multiphase flow model calibration of enhanced DNAPL dissolution.
    Karaoglu AG; Copty NK; Akyol NH; Kilavuz SA; Babaei M
    J Contam Hydrol; 2019 Aug; 225():103515. PubMed ID: 31181539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Parameters that control the cleanup of fractured permeable aquifers.
    Rubin H; Yaniv S; Spiller M; Köngeter J
    J Contam Hydrol; 2008 Feb; 96(1-4):128-49. PubMed ID: 18191497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Numerical modelling of the impact of surfactant partitioning on surfactant-enhanced aquifer remediation.
    Babaei M; Copty NK
    J Contam Hydrol; 2019 Feb; 221():69-81. PubMed ID: 30691860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of simplified mass transfer models to simulate the impacts of source zone architecture on nonaqueous phase liquid dissolution in heterogeneous porous media.
    Zhang C; Yoon H; Werth CJ; Valocchi AJ; Basu NB; Jawitz JW
    J Contam Hydrol; 2008 Nov; 102(1-2):49-60. PubMed ID: 18579257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of domain shapes on the morphological evolution of nonaqueous-phase-liquid dissolution fronts in fluid-saturated porous media.
    Zhao C; Hobbs BE; Ord A
    J Contam Hydrol; 2012 Sep; 138-139():123-40. PubMed ID: 22892525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multicomponent NAPL source dissolution: evaluation of mass-transfer coefficients.
    Mobile MA; Widdowson MA; Gallagher DL
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Sep; 46(18):10047-54. PubMed ID: 22873644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.