These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31720031)
21. WiScope® single use digital flexible ureteroscope versus reusable flexible ureteroscope for management of renal stones: a prospective randomized study. Ali AI; Eldakhakhny A; Abdelfadel A; Rohiem MF; Elbadry M; Hassan A World J Urol; 2022 Sep; 40(9):2323-2330. PubMed ID: 35895116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Performance of Single-Use FlexorVue vs Reusable BoaVision Ureteroscope for Visualization of Calices and Stone Extraction in an Artificial Kidney Model. Schlager D; Hein S; Obaid MA; Wilhelm K; Miernik A; Schoenthaler M J Endourol; 2017 Nov; 31(11):1139-1144. PubMed ID: 28844156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Hybrid flexible ureteroscopy strategy in the management of renal stones - a narrative review. Geavlete B; Mareș C; Mulțescu R; Georgescu D; Geavlete P J Med Life; 2022 Aug; 15(8):919-926. PubMed ID: 36188640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Retrograde intrarenal surgery using the single - use flexible ureteroscope Uscope 3022 (Pusen™): evaluation of clinical results. Salvadó JA; Olivares R; Cabello JM; Cabello R; Moreno S; Pfeifer J; Román C; Velasco A Cent European J Urol; 2018; 71(2):202-207. PubMed ID: 30038811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Single use versus reusable digital flexible ureteroscopes: A prospective comparative study. Kam J; Yuminaga Y; Beattie K; Ling KY; Arianayagam M; Canagasingham B; Ferguson R; Varol C; Khadra M; Winter M; Ko R Int J Urol; 2019 Oct; 26(10):999-1005. PubMed ID: 31448473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Carbon Footprint in Flexible Ureteroscopy: A Comparative Study on the Environmental Impact of Reusable and Single-Use Ureteroscopes. Davis NF; McGrath S; Quinlan M; Jack G; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton DM J Endourol; 2018 Mar; 32(3):214-217. PubMed ID: 29373918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of New Single-Use Digital Flexible Ureteroscope Versus Nondisposable Fiber Optic and Digital Ureteroscope in a Cadaveric Model. Proietti S; Dragos L; Molina W; Doizi S; Giusti G; Traxer O J Endourol; 2016 Jun; 30(6):655-9. PubMed ID: 27084572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The application of a single-use fiberoptic flexible ureteroscope for the management of upper urinary calculi. Wang F; Yang Y; Chen H; Huang H; Huang W; Weng Z; Xie H Int Urol Nephrol; 2018 Jul; 50(7):1235-1241. PubMed ID: 29797215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A single center comparative study of two single use digital flexible ureteroscopy in the management of renal stones less than 2 cm. Zanaty F; Elshazly M; Kandeel H; Salman B World J Urol; 2023 Mar; 41(3):777-782. PubMed ID: 36700975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Steep Infundibulopelvic Angle as a New Risk Factor for Flexible Ureteroscope Damage and Complicated Postoperative Course. Ozimek T; Cordes J; Wiessmeyer JR; Schneider MH; Hupe MC; Gilbert N; Merseburger AS; Kramer MW J Endourol; 2018 Jul; 32(7):597-602. PubMed ID: 29737199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Next-Generation Single-Use Ureteroscopes: An In Vitro Comparison. Tom WR; Wollin DA; Jiang R; Radvak D; Simmons WN; Preminger GM; Lipkin ME J Endourol; 2017 Dec; 31(12):1301-1306. PubMed ID: 28978227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Defining the Costs of Reusable Flexible Ureteroscope Reprocessing Using Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing. Isaacson D; Ahmad T; Metzler I; Tzou DT; Taguchi K; Usawachintachit M; Zetumer S; Sherer B; Stoller M; Chi T J Endourol; 2017 Oct; 31(10):1026-1031. PubMed ID: 28830223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Single-use flexible ureteroscopes: update and perspective in developing countries. A narrative review. Mazzucchi E; Marchini GS; Berto FCG; Denstedt J; Danilovic A; Vicentini FC; Torricelli FCM; Battagello CA; Srougi M; Nahas WC Int Braz J Urol; 2022; 48(3):456-467. PubMed ID: 34786927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Retrospective Cost Analysis of a Single-Center Reusable Flexible Ureterorenoscopy Program: A Comparative Cost Simulation of Disposable fURS as an Alternative. Ozimek T; Schneider MH; Hupe MC; Wiessmeyer JR; Cordes J; Chlosta PL; Merseburger AS; Kramer MW J Endourol; 2017 Dec; 31(12):1226-1230. PubMed ID: 29073769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Prospective evaluation of flexible ureteroscopes with a novel evaluation tool. Bell JR; Penniston KL; Best SL; Nakada SY Can J Urol; 2017 Oct; 24(5):9004-9010. PubMed ID: 28971788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparing the Efficacy of a Multimodular Flexible Ureteroscope With Its Conventional Counterpart in the Management of Renal Stones. Ding J; Xu D; Cao Q; Huang T; Zhu Y; Huang K; Chen Y; Liang C; Qi J; Huang Y Urology; 2015 Aug; 86(2):224-9. PubMed ID: 26169008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Single-Use Digital Flexible Ureteroscopes as a Safe and Effective Choice for the Treatment of Lower Pole Renal Stones: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized-Controlled Trial. Yang E; Jing S; Niu Y; Qi S; Yadav PK; Yang L; Bao J; Tian J; Wang J; Li N; Ou T; Wang Z J Endourol; 2021 Dec; 35(12):1773-1778. PubMed ID: 34375127 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]