These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3172004)

  • 1. A graphic comparison of mandibular border movements generated by various articulators. Part I: Methodology.
    Stern N; Hatano Y; Kolling JN; Clayton JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1988 Aug; 60(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 3172004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A graphic comparison of mandibular border movements generated by various articulators. Part II: Results.
    Hatano Y; Kolling JN; Stern N; Clayton JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Apr; 61(4):425-9. PubMed ID: 2724155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of articulator settings obtained by using an electronic pantograph and lateral interocclusal recordings.
    Price RB; Bannerman RA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1988 Aug; 60(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 3172002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the intercondylar distance and the interfacial width as used with the electronic pantograph.
    Mandilaris CB; Beard CC; Clayton JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Mar; 67(3):331-4. PubMed ID: 1507096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Observations on the use of the Denar pantograph and articulator.
    Winstanley RB
    J Prosthet Dent; 1977 Dec; 38(6):660-72. PubMed ID: 271716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Technique for transferring information from a pantograph tracing to semiadjustable articulators.
    Gordon SR; Stoffer WM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Oct; 54(4):503-7. PubMed ID: 3862808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An in vitro evaluation of the reliability and validity of an electronic pantograph by testing with five different articulators.
    Chang WS; Romberg E; Driscoll CF; Tabacco MJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Jul; 92(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 15232566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of an electronic and a mechanical pantograph. Part I: Consistency of an electronic computerized pantograph to record articulator settings.
    Beard CC; Donaldson K; Clayton JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1986 May; 55(5):570-4. PubMed ID: 3458908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Classification of articulators.
    Rihani A
    J Prosthet Dent; 1980 Mar; 43(3):344-7. PubMed ID: 6928204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new semiadjustable articulator. Part III. An investigation of the capability of the Hanau XP-51 articulator.
    Finger IM; Tanaka H
    J Prosthet Dent; 1977 Mar; 37(3):310-9. PubMed ID: 264967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A new semiadjustable articulator. Part IV: an investigation of three semiadjustable articulators.
    Tanaka H; Finger IM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1978 Sep; 40(3):288-93. PubMed ID: 279672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Formula for adjusting the horizontal condylar path of the semiadjustable articulator with interocclusal records. Part II: Practical evaluations.
    Hobo S
    J Prosthet Dent; 1986 May; 55(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 3458910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The articulator as a dental instrument, not a dental philosophy.
    DePietro AJ
    Dent Clin North Am; 1979 Apr; 23(2):213-29. PubMed ID: 285899
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reproduction ofarticulator settings and movements with an ultrasonic jaw movement recorder.
    Baker PJ; Setchell DJ; Tredwin CJ
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2006 Jun; 14(2):55-62. PubMed ID: 16808105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Teledyne Articulator System 154 as applied to complete denture construction.
    Tanaka H
    Dent Clin North Am; 1979 Apr; 23(2):289-303. PubMed ID: 374136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of condylar control settings using three methods: a bench study.
    Pelletier LB; Campbell SD
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Aug; 66(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 1774679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Centric relation and programming semiadjustable articulators with the universal jig. Part I: Technique.
    Dupas PH; Picart B; Lefevre C; Graux E
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Aug; 64(2):134-8. PubMed ID: 2391665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Errors incurred in programming a fully adjustable articulator with a pantograph.
    Curtis DA; Sorensen JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1986 Apr; 55(4):427-9. PubMed ID: 3457176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Recording of mandibular movements with the Panadent (quick analyser) articulator system].
    Kraljević K; Vukovojac S
    Acta Stomatol Croat; 1984; 18(4):269-78. PubMed ID: 6598293
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of the Stuart articulator in obtaining optimal occlusion.
    Stuart CE
    Dent Clin North Am; 1979 Apr; 23(2):259-70. PubMed ID: 285902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.