143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31720780)
1. On the putative role of intervening events in exogenous attention.
Martín-Arévalo E; Botta F; De Haro V; Lupiáñez J
Psychol Res; 2021 Mar; 85(2):808-815. PubMed ID: 31720780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Temporal ambiguity of onsets in a cueing task prevents facilitation but not inhibition of return.
Malevich T; Ardasheva L; Krüger HM; MacInnes WJ
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jan; 80(1):106-117. PubMed ID: 29075992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Task dependent modulation of exogenous attention: effects of target duration and intervening events.
Martín-Arévalo E; Chica AB; Lupiáñez J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Aug; 75(6):1148-60. PubMed ID: 23709067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sensory adaptation and inhibition of return: dissociating multiple inhibitory cueing effects.
Lim A; Eng V; Janssen SMJ; Satel J
Exp Brain Res; 2018 May; 236(5):1369-1382. PubMed ID: 29520444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The causal role of the left parietal lobe in facilitation and inhibition of return.
Martín-Arévalo E; Lupiáñez J; Narganes-Pineda C; Marino G; Colás I; Chica AB
Cortex; 2019 Aug; 117():311-322. PubMed ID: 31185374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Electrophysiological modulations of exogenous attention by intervening events.
Martín-Arévalo E; Chica AB; Lupiáñez J
Brain Cogn; 2014 Mar; 85():239-50. PubMed ID: 24463767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Inhibition of return following an auditory cue. The role of central reorienting events.
Spence C; Driver J
Exp Brain Res; 1998 Feb; 118(3):352-60. PubMed ID: 9497142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of reward on orienting and reorienting in exogenous cuing.
Bucker B; Theeuwes J
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2014 Jun; 14(2):635-46. PubMed ID: 24671762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Neural correlates of spatial and non-spatial inhibition of return (IOR) in attentional orienting.
Zhou X; Chen Q
Neuropsychologia; 2008 Sep; 46(11):2766-75. PubMed ID: 18597795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cue-target onset asynchrony modulates interaction between exogenous attention and audiovisual integration.
Xu Z; Yang W; Zhou Z; Ren Y
Cogn Process; 2020 May; 21(2):261-270. PubMed ID: 31953644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. No supplementary evidence of attention to a spatial cue when saccadic facilitation is absent.
MacInnes WJ; Bhatnagar R
Sci Rep; 2018 Sep; 8(1):13289. PubMed ID: 30185930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. On the time course of spatial cueing: Dissociating between a set for fast reorienting and a set for cue-target segregation.
Martín-Arévalo E; Funes MJ; Lupiáñez J
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Feb; 203():103004. PubMed ID: 31935658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cross-modal cueing in audiovisual spatial attention.
Blurton SP; Greenlee MW; Gondan M
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Oct; 77(7):2356-76. PubMed ID: 26001381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Inhibitory interaction: the effects of multiple non-predictive visual cues.
Visser TA; Barnes D
Psychol Res; 2010 Nov; 74(6):532-44. PubMed ID: 20182742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Orienting of attention without awareness is affected by measurement-induced attentional control settings.
Ivanoff J; Klein RM
J Vis; 2003; 3(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 12678623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture.
Huang W; Su Y; Zhen Y; Qu Z
Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):650-62. PubMed ID: 26879628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Electrophysiological explorations of the cause and effect of inhibition of return in a cue-target paradigm.
Tian Y; Klein RM; Satel J; Xu P; Yao D
Brain Topogr; 2011 Jun; 24(2):164-82. PubMed ID: 21365310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The roles of feature-specific task set and bottom-up salience in attentional capture: an ERP study.
Eimer M; Kiss M; Press C; Sauter D
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1316-28. PubMed ID: 19803639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The processes of facilitation and inhibition in a cue-target paradigm: insight from movement trajectory deviations.
Neyedli HF; Welsh TN
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Jan; 139(1):159-65. PubMed ID: 22133725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Placeholders dissociate two forms of inhibition of return.
Hilchey MD; Pratt J; Christie J
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Feb; 71(2):360-371. PubMed ID: 27737621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
