These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31720780)

  • 21. Effect of different directions of attentional shift on inhibition of return in three-dimensional space.
    Wang A; Liu X; Chen Q; Zhang M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Apr; 78(3):838-47. PubMed ID: 26758976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Is "Inhibition of Return" due to the inhibition of the return of attention?
    Martín-Arévalo E; Kingstone A; Lupiáñez J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(2):347-59. PubMed ID: 22928599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Spatial and feature-based effects of exogenous cueing on visual motion processing.
    Busse L; Katzner S; Treue S
    Vision Res; 2006 Jun; 46(13):2019-27. PubMed ID: 16476463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Detection costs and contingent attentional capture.
    Schönhammer JG; Kerzel D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):429-437. PubMed ID: 27896707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Accelerated time-course of inhibition of return in Huntington's disease.
    Fielding J; Georgiou-Karistianis N; Bradshaw J; Millist L; Churchyard A; White O
    Behav Brain Res; 2006 Jan; 166(2):211-9. PubMed ID: 16153717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Shape effects on reflexive spatial selective attention and a plausible neurophysiological model.
    Patel SS; Peng X; Sereno AB
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(13):1235-48. PubMed ID: 20399801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Perceptual merging contributes to cueing effects.
    Krüger HM; MacInnes WJ; Hunt AR
    J Vis; 2014 Jun; 14(7):. PubMed ID: 24961250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Temporal expectancy modulates inhibition of return in a discrimination task.
    Gabay S; Henik A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Feb; 17(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 20081160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Inhibition of return exaggerates change blindness.
    Smith DT; Schenk T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Nov; 63(11):2231-8. PubMed ID: 20336583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Modulation of Neuronal Responses by Exogenous Attention in Macaque Primary Visual Cortex.
    Wang F; Chen M; Yan Y; Zhaoping L; Li W
    J Neurosci; 2015 Sep; 35(39):13419-29. PubMed ID: 26424888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Attentional capture by context cues, not inhibition of cue singletons, explains same location costs.
    Schönhammer JG; Becker SI; Kerzel D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Jun; 46(6):610-628. PubMed ID: 32191113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. No evidence for rhythmic sampling in inhibition of return.
    Michel R; Busch NA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Aug; 85(6):2111-2121. PubMed ID: 37610529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Multiple cueing dissociates location- and feature-based repetition effects.
    Hu K; Zhan J; Li B; He S; Samuel AG
    Vision Res; 2014 Aug; 101():73-81. PubMed ID: 24907677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. There's little return for attentional momentum.
    Snyder JJ; Schmidt WC; Kingstone A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Dec; 35(6):1726-37. PubMed ID: 19968431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Revising the link between microsaccades and the spatial cueing of voluntary attention.
    Meyberg S; Sinn P; Engbert R; Sommer W
    Vision Res; 2017 Apr; 133():47-60. PubMed ID: 28163059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Different effects of exogenous cues in a visual detection and discrimination task: delayed attention withdrawal and/or speeded motor inhibition?
    Van der Lubbe RH; Vogel RO; Postma A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1829-40. PubMed ID: 16356322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The modulation of expectation violation on attention: Evidence from the spatial cueing effects.
    Chen L; Zhu P; Li J; Song H; Liu H; Shen M; Chen H
    Cognition; 2023 Sep; 238():105488. PubMed ID: 37178591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Gaze cueing of attention in schizophrenia: individual differences in neuropsychological functioning and symptoms.
    Nestor PG; Klein K; Pomplun M; Niznikiewicz M; McCarley RW
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2010 Mar; 32(3):281-8. PubMed ID: 19544134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Rewards weaken cross-modal inhibition of return with visual targets.
    Qian Q; Lu M; Sun D; Wang A; Zhang M
    Perception; 2023 Jun; 52(6):400-411. PubMed ID: 37186788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Interaction between stimulus-driven orienting and top-down modulation in attentional capture.
    Liao HI; Yeh SL
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 21645875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.