288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31721495)
1. [Comparison of clinical effects of a modified socket shield technique and the conventional immediate implant placement].
Xu YM; Huang H; Wang L; Wu QQ; Fu G; Li J
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Oct; 37(5):490-495. PubMed ID: 31721495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the soft and hard peri-implant tissue dimensional changes around single immediate implants in the esthetic zone with socket shield technique versus using xenograft: A randomized controlled clinical trial.
Atef M; El Barbary A; Dahrous MSE; Zahran AF
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2021 Jun; 23(3):456-465. PubMed ID: 34028974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The socket shield technique for immediate implant placement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Atieh MA; Shah M; Abdulkareem M; AlQahtani HA; Alsabeeha NHM
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2021 Dec; 33(8):1186-1200. PubMed ID: 34380176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Socket shield technique vs conventional immediate implant placement with immediate temporization. Randomized clinical trial.
Abd-Elrahman A; Shaheen M; Askar N; Atef M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2020 Oct; 22(5):602-611. PubMed ID: 32757311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Soft Tissue Volumetric Changes and Pink Esthetics After Immediate Implant Placement with Socket Shield and Conventional Techniques: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Venkatraman N; Jain V; Nanda A; Koli DK
Int J Prosthodont; 2023 Dec; 36(6):674-680. PubMed ID: 38109387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of soft tissue and labial plate of bone stability with immediate implant in direct contact versus gap with socket shield: A randomized clinical trial with 1 year follow-up.
Abdullah AH; Abdel Gaber HK; Adel-Khattab D
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2022 Oct; 24(5):548-558. PubMed ID: 35763398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Navigation guided socket-shield technique for implant and pontic sites in the esthetic zone: A proof-of-concept 1-year prospective study with immediate implant placement and loading.
Pozzi A; Arcuri L; Kan J; Londono J
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Jan; 34(1):203-214. PubMed ID: 34994995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Modified Socket Shield Technique.
Han CH; Park KB; Mangano FG
J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Nov; 29(8):2247-2254. PubMed ID: 29561484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Socket-shield Technique vs Conventional Immediate Implant Placement for Esthetic Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Salem AS; Mowafey B; El-Negoly SA; Grawish ME
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 Feb; 23(2):237-244. PubMed ID: 35748456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Socket shield technique and delayed implant placement in maxilla: a series of five case reports.
Shadid RM
BMC Oral Health; 2022 Apr; 22(1):110. PubMed ID: 35382808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing conventional flap-less immediate implantation and socket-shield technique for esthetic and clinical outcomes: A randomized clinical study.
Sun C; Zhao J; Liu Z; Tan L; Huang Y; Zhao L; Tao H
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 Feb; 31(2):181-191. PubMed ID: 31680339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Esthetic evaluation of conventional and socket shield technique immediate implant restoration].
Chen L; Li DL; Yang Y; Liu XQ; Tan JG
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Apr; 57(4):346-351. PubMed ID: 35368160
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing Bone Alteration and Esthetic Recovery Between the Socket-Shield Technique and the Conventional Immediate Implant Technique: A Retrospective Study.
Li X; Liu N; Li X; Fu G; Huang H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2024 Apr; 39(2):254-262. PubMed ID: 38394443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical efficacy of the socket shield technique used in the aesthetic zone: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Gao B; Lai X; Dong Y; Li X
Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2022 Mar; 15(1):45-55. PubMed ID: 35266668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Could the socket shield technique be better than conventional immediate implantation? A meta-analysis.
Zhang A; Liu Y; Liu X; Cai X; Sun L; Li T
Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Feb; 26(2):1173-1182. PubMed ID: 34783912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Socket-shield Technique and Immediate Implant Placement for Ridge Preservation: Case Report Series with 1-year Follow-up.
Habashneh RA; Walid MA; Abualteen T; Abukar M
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Sep; 20(9):1108-1117. PubMed ID: 31797838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Evaluation of immediate implant in patients with limited buccal bone wall dehiscence in single upper anterior tooth].
Zhang XX; Wu XY; Xia T; Feng S; Hu Q; Yan Q; Shi B
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Nov; 55(11):831-837. PubMed ID: 33171555
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Immediate implant placement with socket shield technique in the maxilla: a prospective case series evaluation at 1-year follow-up.
Shadid RM
Head Face Med; 2022 Jun; 18(1):17. PubMed ID: 35689246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Clinical evaluation of socket shield technique in maxillary anterior region].
Zhu YB; Qiu LX; Chen L; Gao M; Yu HJ; Wang J
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Oct; 53(10):665-668. PubMed ID: 30392222
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Dynamic monitoring and esthetic evaluation of dimensional changes in the peri-implant soft tissue contour after the immediate implant placement and provisionalization with the modified socket-shield technique in the esthetic zone].
Tang XF; Wu QQ; Chen X; Wang Y; Fu G
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2024 Jun; 59(6):551-558. PubMed ID: 38808415
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
