These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31721606)

  • 1. Evaluating the Effects of In-Vehicle Side-View Display Layout Design on Physical Demands of Driving.
    Beck D; Jung J; Park W
    Hum Factors; 2021 Mar; 63(2):348-363. PubMed ID: 31721606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparative evaluation of in-vehicle side view displays layouts in critical lane changing situation.
    Beck D; Lee M; Park W
    Ergonomics; 2017 Dec; 60(12):1682-1691. PubMed ID: 28617652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Driver eye glance behavior and performance with camera-based visibility systems versus mirrors.
    Mazzae EN; Satterfield KS; Baldwin GHS; Skuce IA; Andrella A
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(sup1):S94-S99. PubMed ID: 37267006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Case for Raising the Camera: A Driving Simulator Test of Camera-Monitor Systems.
    Bernhard C; Reinhard R; Kleer M; Hecht H
    Hum Factors; 2023 Mar; 65(2):321-336. PubMed ID: 33887966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing drivers' visual attention at Junctions in Real and Simulated Environments.
    Robbins CJ; Allen HA; Chapman P
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Oct; 80():89-101. PubMed ID: 31280814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reading text while driving: understanding drivers' strategic and tactical adaptation to distraction.
    Liang Y; Horrey WJ; Hoffman JD
    Hum Factors; 2015 Mar; 57(2):347-59. PubMed ID: 25850162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Driving without wings: The effect of different digital mirror locations on the visual behaviour, performance and opinions of drivers.
    Large DR; Crundall E; Burnett G; Harvey C; Konstantopoulos P
    Appl Ergon; 2016 Jul; 55():138-148. PubMed ID: 26995044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantifying driver's field-of-view in tractors: methodology and case study.
    Gilad I; Byran E
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2015; 21(1):20-9. PubMed ID: 26327259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Where we look when we steer.
    Land MF; Lee DN
    Nature; 1994 Jun; 369(6483):742-4. PubMed ID: 8008066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Faster R-CNN and Geometric Transformation-Based Detection of Driver's Eyes Using Multiple Near-Infrared Camera Sensors.
    Park SH; Yoon HS; Park KR
    Sensors (Basel); 2019 Jan; 19(1):. PubMed ID: 30621110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Safety implications of providing real-time feedback to distracted drivers.
    Donmez B; Boyle LN; Lee JD
    Accid Anal Prev; 2007 May; 39(3):581-90. PubMed ID: 17109807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Driver's visual attention as a function of driving experience and visibility. Using a driving simulator to explore drivers' eye movements in day, night and rain driving.
    Konstantopoulos P; Chapman P; Crundall D
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 May; 42(3):827-34. PubMed ID: 20380909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fatal crash between a car operating with automated control systems and a tractor-semitrailer truck.
    Poland K; McKay MP; Bruce D; Becic E
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S153-S156. PubMed ID: 30841795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of momentary visual disruption on hazard anticipation and awareness in driving.
    Borowsky A; Horrey WJ; Liang Y; Garabet A; Simmons L; Fisher DL
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 24697569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A mathematical model for predicting lane changes using the steering wheel angle.
    Schmidt K; Beggiato M; Hoffmann KH; Krems JF
    J Safety Res; 2014 Jun; 49():85-90. PubMed ID: 24913491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of bus drivers reaction to simulated traffic collision situations - eye-tracking studies.
    Bortkiewicz A; Gadzicka E; Siedlecka J; Kosobudzki M; Dania M; Szymczak W; Jóźwiak Z; Szyjkowska A; Viebig P; Pas-Wyroślak A; Makowiec-Dąbrowska T; Kapitaniak B; Hickman JS
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2019 Apr; 32(2):161-174. PubMed ID: 30575822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identifying cognitive distraction using steering wheel reversal rates.
    Kountouriotis GK; Spyridakos P; Carsten OMJ; Merat N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Nov; 96():39-45. PubMed ID: 27497055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A sudden variation in the visual field reduces driver's accuracy in estimation of the speed of the car ahead.
    Huang YY
    Ergonomics; 2020 Nov; 63(11):1371-1379. PubMed ID: 32628067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A systematic review of camera monitor system display layout designs: Integration of existing knowledge.
    Ryu J; Beck D; Park W
    Appl Ergon; 2024 Jul; 118():104228. PubMed ID: 38428169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Looking forward to safer HGVs: The impact of mirrors on driver reaction times.
    Mole CD; Wilkie RM
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Oct; 107():173-185. PubMed ID: 28865992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.