335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31721947)
1. Skeletal Class III malocclusion treatment using mandibular and maxillary skeletal anchorage and intermaxillary elastics: a case report.
Fakharian M; Bardideh E; Abtahi M
Dental Press J Orthod; 2019; 24(5):52-59. PubMed ID: 31721947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dentofacial effects of skeletal anchored treatment modalities for the correction of maxillary retrognathia.
Sar C; Sahinoğlu Z; Özçirpici AA; Uçkan S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jan; 145(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 24373654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Maxillary protraction using skeletal anchorage and intermaxillary elastics in Skeletal Class III patients.
Esenlik E; Ağlarcı C; Albayrak GE; Fındık Y
Korean J Orthod; 2015 Mar; 45(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 25798416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Severe unilateral scissors-bite with a constricted mandibular arch: Bite turbos and extra-alveolar bone screws in the infrazygomatic crests and mandibular buccal shelf.
Lee SA; Chang CCH; Roberts WE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Oct; 154(4):554-569. PubMed ID: 30268266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of short-term effects between face mask and skeletal anchorage therapy with intermaxillary elastics in patients with maxillary retrognathia.
Ağlarcı C; Esenlik E; Fındık Y
Eur J Orthod; 2016 Jun; 38(3):313-23. PubMed ID: 26219549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-dimensional assessment of mandibular and glenoid fossa changes after bone-anchored Class III intermaxillary traction.
De Clerck H; Nguyen T; de Paula LK; Cevidanes L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jul; 142(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 22748987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of intermaxillary forces in early treatment of maxillary deficient class III patients: results of a case series.
Coscia G; Addabbo F; Peluso V; D'Ambrosio E
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):e350-4. PubMed ID: 22421469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative evaluation of 2 skeletally anchored maxillary protraction protocols.
Elnagar MH; Elshourbagy E; Ghobashy S; Khedr M; Evans CA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):751-762. PubMed ID: 27871701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Orthopaedic and orthodontic treatment with hyrax, Class III elastics on mandibular miniplates, maxillary mini-implants in a Class III adolescent: A case report.
Ganesh G; Tripathi T; Rai P
Int Orthod; 2020 Dec; 18(4):827-838. PubMed ID: 32654977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Maxillary protraction with miniplates providing skeletal anchorage in a growing Class III patient.
Cha BK; Choi DS; Ngan P; Jost-Brinkmann PG; Kim SM; Jang IS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jan; 139(1):99-112. PubMed ID: 21195283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intermaxillary elastics on skeletal anchorage and MARPE to treat a class III maxillary retrognathic open bite adolescent: A case report.
Mehta S; Chen PJ; Upadhyay M; Yadav S
Int Orthod; 2021 Dec; 19(4):707-715. PubMed ID: 34452857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of skeletal anchorage and tooth-borne maxillary protraction followed by fixed appliance in Class III malocclusion.
Lee SH; Koh SD; Chung DH; Lee JW; Lee SM
Eur J Orthod; 2020 Apr; 42(2):193-199. PubMed ID: 31750516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative evaluation of treatment outcomes between temporary anchorage devices and Class III elastics in Class III malocclusions.
Nakamura M; Kawanabe N; Kataoka T; Murakami T; Yamashiro T; Kamioka H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jun; 151(6):1116-1124. PubMed ID: 28554457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A retrospective comparison of two protocols for correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion in prepubertal children: hybrid hyrax expander with mandibular miniplates and rapid maxillary expansion with face mask.
Tarraf NE; Dalci O; Dalci K; Altug AT; Darendeliler MA
Prog Orthod; 2023 Jan; 24(1):3. PubMed ID: 36683080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of shape correspondence analysis to quantify skeletal changes associated with bone-anchored Class III correction.
Nguyen T; Cevidanes L; Paniagua B; Zhu H; Koerich L; De Clerck H
Angle Orthod; 2014 Mar; 84(2):329-36. PubMed ID: 23886012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Canine substitution of congenitally missing maxillary lateral incisors in Class I and Class III malocclusions by using skeletal anchorage.
Amm EW; Antoszewska-Smith J; Boley J
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Oct; 156(4):512-521.e6. PubMed ID: 31582123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Corticotomy-assisted maxillary protraction with skeletal anchorage and Class III elastics.
Yilmaz HN; Garip H; Satilmis T; Kucukkeles N
Angle Orthod; 2015 Jan; 85(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 24913740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A novel method for treatment of Class III malocclusion in growing patients.
Al-Mozany SA; Dalci O; Almuzian M; Gonzalez C; Tarraf NE; Ali Darendeliler M
Prog Orthod; 2017 Dec; 18(1):40. PubMed ID: 29226300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Maxillary protraction at early ages. The revolution of new bone anchorage appliances.
Solano-Mendoza B; Iglesias-Linares A; Yañez-Vico RM; Mendoza-Mendoza A; Alió-Sanz JJ; Solano-Reina E
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2012; 37(2):219-29. PubMed ID: 23534334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Maxillary protaction with zygomatic anchorage in a growing class III patient.
Aldaz J; Andrade D; Aguilar E; Bravo M
Int Orthod; 2019 Jun; 17(2):395-401. PubMed ID: 31056418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
