BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31723409)

  • 1. Predicting transcription factor binding using ensemble random forest models.
    Behjati Ardakani F; Schmidt F; Schulz MH
    F1000Res; 2018; 7():1603. PubMed ID: 31723409
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing the model transferability for prediction of transcription factor binding sites based on chromatin accessibility.
    Liu S; Zibetti C; Wan J; Wang G; Blackshaw S; Qian J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Jul; 18(1):355. PubMed ID: 28750606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improved linking of motifs to their TFs using domain information.
    Baumgarten N; Schmidt F; Schulz MH
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Mar; 36(6):1655-1662. PubMed ID: 31742324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contribution of Sequence Motif, Chromatin State, and DNA Structure Features to Predictive Models of Transcription Factor Binding in Yeast.
    Tsai ZT; Shiu SH; Tsai HK
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Aug; 11(8):e1004418. PubMed ID: 26291518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. BinDNase: a discriminatory approach for transcription factor binding prediction using DNase I hypersensitivity data.
    Kähärä J; Lähdesmäki H
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Sep; 31(17):2852-9. PubMed ID: 25957350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Discovery of cell-type specific DNA motif grammar in cis-regulatory elements using random Forest.
    Wang X; Lin P; Ho JWK
    BMC Genomics; 2018 Jan; 19(Suppl 1):929. PubMed ID: 29363433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the problem of confounders in modeling gene expression.
    Schmidt F; Schulz MH
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Feb; 35(4):711-719. PubMed ID: 30084962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. TICA: Transcriptional Interaction and Coregulation Analyzer.
    Perna S; Pinoli P; Ceri S; Wong L
    Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics; 2018 Oct; 16(5):342-353. PubMed ID: 30578913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. MOCCS: Clarifying DNA-binding motif ambiguity using ChIP-Seq data.
    Ozaki H; Iwasaki W
    Comput Biol Chem; 2016 Aug; 63():62-72. PubMed ID: 26971251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The next generation of transcription factor binding site prediction.
    Mathelier A; Wasserman WW
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2013; 9(9):e1003214. PubMed ID: 24039567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Virtual ChIP-seq: predicting transcription factor binding by learning from the transcriptome.
    Karimzadeh M; Hoffman MM
    Genome Biol; 2022 Jun; 23(1):126. PubMed ID: 35681170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mocap: large-scale inference of transcription factor binding sites from chromatin accessibility.
    Chen X; Yu B; Carriero N; Silva C; Bonneau R
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2017 May; 45(8):4315-4329. PubMed ID: 28334916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predicting transcription factor site occupancy using DNA sequence intrinsic and cell-type specific chromatin features.
    Kumar S; Bucher P
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Jan; 17 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):4. PubMed ID: 26818008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. abc4pwm: affinity based clustering for position weight matrices in applications of DNA sequence analysis.
    Ali O; Farooq A; Yang M; Jin VX; Bjørås M; Wang J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Mar; 23(1):83. PubMed ID: 35240993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An efficient method to transcription factor binding sites imputation via simultaneous completion of multiple matrices with positional consistency.
    Guo WL; Huang DS
    Mol Biosyst; 2017 Aug; 13(9):1827-1837. PubMed ID: 28718849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Anchor: trans-cell type prediction of transcription factor binding sites.
    Li H; Quang D; Guan Y
    Genome Res; 2019 Feb; 29(2):281-292. PubMed ID: 30567711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Revealing transcription factor and histone modification co-localization and dynamics across cell lines by integrating ChIP-seq and RNA-seq data.
    Zhang L; Xue G; Liu J; Li Q; Wang Y
    BMC Genomics; 2018 Dec; 19(Suppl 10):914. PubMed ID: 30598100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Imputation for transcription factor binding predictions based on deep learning.
    Qin Q; Feng J
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Feb; 13(2):e1005403. PubMed ID: 28234893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cell-type and transcription factor specific enrichment of transcriptional cofactor motifs in ENCODE ChIP-seq data.
    Goi C; Little P; Xie C
    BMC Genomics; 2013; 14 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S2. PubMed ID: 24564528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A map of direct TF-DNA interactions in the human genome.
    Gheorghe M; Sandve GK; Khan A; Chèneby J; Ballester B; Mathelier A
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2019 Feb; 47(4):e21. PubMed ID: 30517703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.