These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31724796)

  • 1. Influence diagnostics and outlier detection for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.
    Matsushima Y; Noma H; Yamada T; Furukawa TA
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 Mar; 11(2):237-247. PubMed ID: 31724796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Outlier detection and influence diagnostics in network meta-analysis.
    Noma H; Gosho M; Ishii R; Oba K; Furukawa TA
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 Nov; 11(6):891-902. PubMed ID: 32921002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robust bivariate random-effects model for accommodating outlying and influential studies in meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies.
    Negeri ZF; Beyene J
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Nov; 29(11):3308-3325. PubMed ID: 32469266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A general framework for comparative Bayesian meta-analysis of diagnostic studies.
    Menten J; Lesaffre E
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Aug; 15():70. PubMed ID: 26315894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of ultrasonography in predicting vesicoureteral reflux in children: A meta-analysis.
    Saltychev M; Ristola MT; Laimi K; Hurme T
    Scand J Urol; 2016 Aug; 50(4):239-45. PubMed ID: 27310111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tutorial: statistical methods for the meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies.
    Schlattmann P
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2023 Apr; 61(5):777-794. PubMed ID: 36656998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An empirical comparison of methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy showed hierarchical models are necessary.
    Harbord RM; Whiting P; Sterne JA; Egger M; Deeks JJ; Shang A; Bachmann LM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Nov; 61(11):1095-103. PubMed ID: 19208372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sensitivity analysis for publication bias in meta-analysis of diagnostic studies for a continuous biomarker.
    Hattori S; Zhou XH
    Stat Med; 2018 Feb; 37(3):327-342. PubMed ID: 28990209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy assessment studies with varying number of thresholds.
    Dukic V; Gatsonis C
    Biometrics; 2003 Dec; 59(4):936-46. PubMed ID: 14969472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three-dimensional saline infusion sonography compared to two-dimensional saline infusion sonography for the diagnosis of focal intracavitary lesions.
    Nieuwenhuis LL; Hermans FJ; Bij de Vaate AJM; Leeflang MM; Brölmann HA; Hehenkamp WJ; Mol BWJ; Clark TJ; Huirne JA
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 May; 5(5):CD011126. PubMed ID: 28472862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Meta-DiSc 2.0: a web application for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy data.
    Plana MN; Arevalo-Rodriguez I; Fernández-García S; Soto J; Fabregate M; Pérez T; Roqué M; Zamora J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Nov; 22(1):306. PubMed ID: 36443653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Vesicoureteral reflux in children with urinary tract infection: comparison of diagnostic accuracy of renal US criteria.
    Leroy S; Vantalon S; Larakeb A; Ducou-Le-Pointe H; Bensman A
    Radiology; 2010 Jun; 255(3):890-8. PubMed ID: 20501726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development of an interactive web-based tool to conduct and interrogate meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies: MetaDTA.
    Freeman SC; Kerby CR; Patel A; Cooper NJ; Quinn T; Sutton AJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Apr; 19(1):81. PubMed ID: 30999861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Graphical enhancements to summary receiver operating characteristic plots to facilitate the analysis and reporting of meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy data.
    Patel A; Cooper N; Freeman S; Sutton A
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 Jan; 12(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 32706182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statistical methods for detecting outlying and influential studies in meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies.
    Negeri ZF; Beyene J
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Apr; 29(4):1227-1242. PubMed ID: 31203742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A general framework for the use of logistic regression models in meta-analysis.
    Simmonds MC; Higgins JP
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Dec; 25(6):2858-2877. PubMed ID: 24823642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Investigation of publication bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a meta-epidemiological study.
    van Enst WA; Ochodo E; Scholten RJ; Hooft L; Leeflang MM
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 May; 14():70. PubMed ID: 24884381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Univariate and bivariate likelihood-based meta-analysis methods performed comparably when marginal sensitivity and specificity were the targets of inference.
    Dahabreh IJ; Trikalinos TA; Lau J; Schmid CH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Mar; 83():8-17. PubMed ID: 28063915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An empirical comparison of three methods for multiple cutoff diagnostic test meta-analysis of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) depression screening tool using published data vs individual level data.
    Benedetti A; Levis B; Rücker G; Jones HE; Schumacher M; Ioannidis JPA; Thombs B;
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 Nov; 11(6):833-848. PubMed ID: 32896096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bayesian bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity: summary of quantitative findings in 50 meta-analyses.
    Menke J
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2014 Dec; 20(6):844-52. PubMed ID: 24828853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.