These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3172630)
1. Kansas State Nurses' Association response and analysis of the AMA'S proposal to prepare registered care technologists and advanced registered care technologists. Kans Nurse; 1988 Aug; 63(8):6-7. PubMed ID: 3172630 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Update on AMA's RCT proposal. Mo Nurse; 1988; 57(6):4-5. PubMed ID: 3211122 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Registered care technologists: is the AMA's answer to shortage viable? McCluskey JA Pa Nurse; 1988 Aug; 43(8):3, 5, 12-3. PubMed ID: 3412777 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. AMA's jack of all trades: broad, national marketing campaign for AMA care technician in progress. Little M Tenn Nurse; 1991 Feb; 54(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 1997132 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Debate over Registered Care Technologists: nurses angry, opposed to AMA proposal. Tex Nurs; 1988; 62(6):6, 8. PubMed ID: 3413700 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Nurses oppose AMA proposal for minimally trained technologists. Joel LA Nebr Nurse; 1988 Aug; 21(3):7-8. PubMed ID: 3412534 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Registered care technologists: the ANA response. Neonatal Netw; 1988 Aug; 7(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 3405188 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. An interview with AMA's James Sammons: responding to critics of the RCT proposal. Sammons J Nurs Econ; 1988; 6(5):220-7. PubMed ID: 3059201 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Are registered care technologists (RCT's) the answer? Parker MS Insight; 1989 Feb; 14(1):8. PubMed ID: 2522489 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. North Carolina Nurses Association Position Statement: response to AMA proposal for registered care technologists. Tar Heel Nurse; 1988; 50(4):3-4. PubMed ID: 3175919 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Registered care technologists: the AMA proposal. Neonatal Netw; 1988 Aug; 7(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 3405192 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Nurses oppose AMA proposal for minimally trained technologists. S D Nurse; 1988 Aug; 30(3):4-5. PubMed ID: 3175677 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. RCT proposal draws fire at hearing. Perrin N Am Nurse; 1988; 20(7):4-5. PubMed ID: 3415089 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. AMA proposal: questions and answers. Pelican News; 1988 Aug; 44(4):3, 5. PubMed ID: 3419869 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. ANA House of Delegates addresses the AMA proposal for registered care technologist. Tar Heel Nurse; 1988; 50(4):1-2. PubMed ID: 3175917 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. TriCouncil for Nursing issues statement on assistive personnel for the registered nurse. Allen A J Post Anesth Nurs; 1990 Aug; 5(4):295-6. PubMed ID: 2388175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Nurses act to stop the RCT proposal. Tynan C Ariz Nurse; 1988; 41(5):3, 14. PubMed ID: 3196173 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Nurses oppose American Medical Association's proposal: AMA's proposal. Turner E Ky Nurse; 1988; 36(3):11. PubMed ID: 3386284 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]