305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3172630)
1. Kansas State Nurses' Association response and analysis of the AMA'S proposal to prepare registered care technologists and advanced registered care technologists.
Kans Nurse; 1988 Aug; 63(8):6-7. PubMed ID: 3172630
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Update on AMA's RCT proposal.
Mo Nurse; 1988; 57(6):4-5. PubMed ID: 3211122
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Registered care technologists: is the AMA's answer to shortage viable?
McCluskey JA
Pa Nurse; 1988 Aug; 43(8):3, 5, 12-3. PubMed ID: 3412777
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. AMA's jack of all trades: broad, national marketing campaign for AMA care technician in progress.
Little M
Tenn Nurse; 1991 Feb; 54(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 1997132
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Debate over Registered Care Technologists: nurses angry, opposed to AMA proposal.
Tex Nurs; 1988; 62(6):6, 8. PubMed ID: 3413700
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Nurses oppose AMA proposal for minimally trained technologists.
Joel LA
Nebr Nurse; 1988 Aug; 21(3):7-8. PubMed ID: 3412534
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. AMA's RCT proposal: can we talk?
Feeg VD
Pediatr Nurs; 1988; 14(4):274, 338. PubMed ID: 3412824
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Registered care technologists: the ANA response.
Neonatal Netw; 1988 Aug; 7(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 3405188
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. An interview with AMA's James Sammons: responding to critics of the RCT proposal.
Sammons J
Nurs Econ; 1988; 6(5):220-7. PubMed ID: 3059201
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Are registered care technologists (RCT's) the answer?
Parker MS
Insight; 1989 Feb; 14(1):8. PubMed ID: 2522489
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. North Carolina Nurses Association Position Statement: response to AMA proposal for registered care technologists.
Tar Heel Nurse; 1988; 50(4):3-4. PubMed ID: 3175919
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Registered care technologists: the AMA proposal.
Neonatal Netw; 1988 Aug; 7(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 3405192
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Nurses oppose AMA proposal for minimally trained technologists.
S D Nurse; 1988 Aug; 30(3):4-5. PubMed ID: 3175677
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. RCT proposal draws fire at hearing.
Perrin N
Am Nurse; 1988; 20(7):4-5. PubMed ID: 3415089
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. AMA proposal: questions and answers.
Pelican News; 1988 Aug; 44(4):3, 5. PubMed ID: 3419869
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. ANA House of Delegates addresses the AMA proposal for registered care technologist.
Tar Heel Nurse; 1988; 50(4):1-2. PubMed ID: 3175917
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. TriCouncil for Nursing issues statement on assistive personnel for the registered nurse.
Allen A
J Post Anesth Nurs; 1990 Aug; 5(4):295-6. PubMed ID: 2388175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Nurses act to stop the RCT proposal.
Tynan C
Ariz Nurse; 1988; 41(5):3, 14. PubMed ID: 3196173
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Nurses oppose American Medical Association's proposal: AMA's proposal.
Turner E
Ky Nurse; 1988; 36(3):11. PubMed ID: 3386284
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. LSNA takes position--AMA's registered care technologist unacceptable.
Pelican News; 1988 Oct; 44(5):3. PubMed ID: 3194156
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
