These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31726510)

  • 1. [The hearing self-protection behavior and internal factors of workers exposured to occupational noise].
    Yang J; Liu C; Lan YJ; Ta H; Wang YW
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2019 Oct; 37(10):773-777. PubMed ID: 31726510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interventions to prevent occupational noise-induced hearing loss.
    Verbeek JH; Kateman E; Morata TC; Dreschler WA; Mischke C
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Oct; 10():CD006396. PubMed ID: 23076923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Comparison of knowledge and behavior toward hearing protection among workers in different workplaces and its influence factors].
    Yang M; Ou ZZ; Yang M; He P; He DK; Chen HQ; Liao XQ
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2018 Jun; 36(6):413-415. PubMed ID: 30248733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predictive factors of occupational noise-induced hearing loss in Spanish workers: A prospective study.
    Pelegrin AC; Canuet L; Rodríguez ÁA; Morales MP
    Noise Health; 2015; 17(78):343-9. PubMed ID: 26356377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development of the hearing protection assessment (HPA-2) questionnaire.
    Reddy R; Welch D; Ameratunga S; Thorne P
    Occup Med (Lond); 2014 Apr; 64(3):198-205. PubMed ID: 24514576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development and initial validation of questionnaire on predictors for the use of hearing protection devices among noise exposed manufacturing workers in Tanzania: A methodological study.
    Nyarubeli IP; Tungu AM; Pallesen S; Moen BE; Mamuya SHD
    Front Public Health; 2023; 11():1102343. PubMed ID: 36844814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Explaining Mexican American workers' hearing protection use with the health promotion model.
    Kerr MJ; Lusk SL; Ronis DL
    Nurs Res; 2002; 51(2):100-9. PubMed ID: 11984380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Noise exposure and hearing loss prevention programmes after 20 years of regulations in the United States.
    Daniell WE; Swan SS; McDaniel MM; Camp JE; Cohen MA; Stebbins JG
    Occup Environ Med; 2006 May; 63(5):343-51. PubMed ID: 16551755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Determinants of use of hearing protection devices in Canadian lumber mill workers.
    Sbihi H; Teschke K; MacNab YC; Davies HW
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Apr; 54(3):319-28. PubMed ID: 19570944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors affecting Thai workers' use of hearing protection.
    Tantranont K; Srisuphan W; Kaewthummanukul T; Suthakorn W; Jormsri P; Salazar MK
    AAOHN J; 2009 Nov; 57(11):455-63. PubMed ID: 19873942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effectiveness verification of an educational program about hearing protection for noise-exposed workers.
    Rocha CH; Santos LH; Moreira RR; Neves-Lobo IF; Samelli AG
    J Soc Bras Fonoaudiol; 2011 Mar; 23(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 21552731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interventions to promote the wearing of hearing protection.
    El Dib RP; Verbeek J; Atallah AN; Andriolo RB; Soares BG
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2006 Apr; (2):CD005234. PubMed ID: 16625628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gender and other factors associated with the use of hearing protection devices at work.
    Meira TC; Santana VS; Ferrite S
    Rev Saude Publica; 2015; 49():. PubMed ID: 26487294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Study on the fit testing for the workers wearing hearing protection device in machinery manufacturing enterprises].
    Wang YN; Su SB; Liao CH; Zhong X
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2024 Jan; 42(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 38311944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relationship between risk perception toward hearing conservation and using hearing protection devices among offset printing workers in Tehran province, Iran.
    Vosoughi S; Alimohammadi I; Hosseini AF; Sedghi Noushabadi Z
    Arch Environ Occup Health; 2022; 77(4):338-344. PubMed ID: 33653230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stages of change in hearing-protection behavior, cognition, and hearing status.
    Hong O; Chin DL; Kerr MJ; Ronis DL
    Am J Health Behav; 2012 Nov; 36(6):811-22. PubMed ID: 23026039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How to Choose the Most Effective Hearing Protection?
    Cirgenski T
    Occup Health Saf; 2017 May; 86(5):54-5. PubMed ID: 30285404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Working in noise with a hearing loss: perceptions from workers, supervisors, and hearing conservation program managers.
    Morata TC; Themann CL; Randolph RF; Verbsky BL; Byrne DC; Reeves ER
    Ear Hear; 2005 Dec; 26(6):529-45. PubMed ID: 16377991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Noise exposure to airline ramp employees.
    Tubbs RL
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2000 Sep; 15(9):657-63. PubMed ID: 10983395
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Awareness and knowledge as prerequisites for health oriented behavior].
    Zawadzka B
    Med Pr; 2002; 53(6):489-93. PubMed ID: 12701541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.