302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31726952)
21. Measuring moderate-intensity walking in older adults using the ActiGraph accelerometer.
Barnett A; van den Hoek D; Barnett D; Cerin E
BMC Geriatr; 2016 Dec; 16(1):211. PubMed ID: 27931188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Cross-validation of cut-points in preschool children using different accelerometer placements and data axes.
Altenburg TM; de Vries L; Op den Buijsch R; Eyre E; Dobell A; Duncan M; Chinapaw MJM
J Sports Sci; 2022 Feb; 40(4):379-385. PubMed ID: 35040373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A random forest classifier for the prediction of energy expenditure and type of physical activity from wrist and hip accelerometers.
Ellis K; Kerr J; Godbole S; Lanckriet G; Wing D; Marshall S
Physiol Meas; 2014 Nov; 35(11):2191-203. PubMed ID: 25340969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Development of raw acceleration cut-points for wrist and hip accelerometers to assess sedentary behaviour and physical activity in 5-7-year-old children.
Crotti M; Foweather L; Rudd JR; Hurter L; Schwarz S; Boddy LM
J Sports Sci; 2020 May; 38(9):1036-1045. PubMed ID: 32228156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Can we walk away from cardiovascular disease risk or do we have to 'huff and puff'? A cross-sectional compositional accelerometer data analysis among adults and older adults in the Copenhagen City Heart Study.
Johansson MS; Søgaard K; Prescott E; Marott JL; Schnohr P; Holtermann A; Korshøj M
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2020 Jul; 17(1):84. PubMed ID: 32631371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Validation of the Vivago Wrist-Worn accelerometer in the assessment of physical activity.
Vanhelst J; Hurdiel R; Mikulovic J; Bui-Xuân G; Fardy P; Theunynck D; Béghin L
BMC Public Health; 2012 Aug; 12():690. PubMed ID: 22913286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Calibration of wrist-worn ActiWatch 2 and ActiGraph wGT3X for assessment of physical activity in young adults.
Lee P; Tse CY
Gait Posture; 2019 Feb; 68():141-149. PubMed ID: 30476691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Physical Activity Intensity Cut-Points for Wrist-Worn GENEActiv in Older Adults.
Fraysse F; Post D; Eston R; Kasai D; Rowlands AV; Parfitt G
Front Sports Act Living; 2020; 2():579278. PubMed ID: 33521631
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Validity of accelerometry in ambulatory children and adolescents with cerebral palsy.
Clanchy KM; Tweedy SM; Boyd RN; Trost SG
Eur J Appl Physiol; 2011 Dec; 111(12):2951-9. PubMed ID: 21442163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Separating bedtime rest from activity using waist or wrist-worn accelerometers in youth.
Tracy DJ; Xu Z; Choi L; Acra S; Chen KY; Buchowski MS
PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e92512. PubMed ID: 24727999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluation of wrist and hip sedentary behaviour and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity raw acceleration cutpoints in older adults.
Sanders GJ; Boddy LM; Sparks SA; Curry WB; Roe B; Kaehne A; Fairclough SJ
J Sports Sci; 2019 Jun; 37(11):1270-1279. PubMed ID: 30558487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Wrist-specific accelerometry methods for estimating free-living physical activity.
Kingsley MIC; Nawaratne R; O'Halloran PD; Montoye AHK; Alahakoon D; De Silva D; Staley K; Nicholson M
J Sci Med Sport; 2019 Jun; 22(6):677-683. PubMed ID: 30558904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Ngram time series model to predict activity type and energy cost from wrist, hip and ankle accelerometers: implications of age.
Strath SJ; Kate RJ; Keenan KG; Welch WA; Swartz AM
Physiol Meas; 2015 Nov; 36(11):2335-51. PubMed ID: 26449155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Wrist Acceleration Cut Points for Moderate-to-Vigorous Physical Activity in Youth.
VAN Loo CMT; Okely AD; Batterham MJ; Hinkley T; Ekelund U; Brage S; Reilly JJ; Trost SG; Jones RA; Janssen X; Cliff DP
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2018 Mar; 50(3):609-616. PubMed ID: 29023358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The backwards comparability of wrist worn GENEActiv and waist worn ActiGraph accelerometer estimates of sedentary time in children.
Boddy LM; Noonan RJ; Rowlands AV; Hurter L; Knowles ZR; Fairclough SJ
J Sci Med Sport; 2019 Jul; 22(7):814-820. PubMed ID: 30803818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Examination of different accelerometer cut-points for assessing sedentary behaviors in children.
Kim Y; Lee JM; Peters BP; Gaesser GA; Welk GJ
PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e90630. PubMed ID: 24699259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Generation and validation of ActiGraph GT3X+ accelerometer cut-points for assessing physical activity intensity in older adults. The OUTDOOR ACTIVE validation study.
Bammann K; Thomson NK; Albrecht BM; Buchan DS; Easton C
PLoS One; 2021; 16(6):e0252615. PubMed ID: 34081715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Validating accelerometry as a measure of physical activity and energy expenditure in chronic stroke.
Serra MC; Balraj E; DiSanzo BL; Ivey FM; Hafer-Macko CE; Treuth MS; Ryan AS
Top Stroke Rehabil; 2017 Jan; 24(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 27322733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of intensity-based cut-points for the RT3 accelerometer in youth.
Joschtel BJ; Trost SG
J Sci Med Sport; 2014 Sep; 17(5):501-5. PubMed ID: 24262335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Examining accelerometer validity for estimating physical activity in pre-schoolers during free-living activity.
Dobell AP; Eyre ELJ; Tallis J; Chinapaw MJM; Altenburg TM; Duncan MJ
Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2019 Oct; 29(10):1618-1628. PubMed ID: 31206785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
