161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31727134)
1. How to tackle the conundrum of quality appraisal in systematic reviews of normative literature/information? Analysing the problems of three possible strategies (translation of a German paper).
Mertz M
BMC Med Ethics; 2019 Nov; 20(1):81. PubMed ID: 31727134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Quality appraisal in systematic reviews of normative literature. A problem analysis].
Mertz M
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2017 Nov; 127-128():11-20. PubMed ID: 28863987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. What methods do reviews of normative ethics literature use for search, selection, analysis, and synthesis? In-depth results from a systematic review of reviews.
Mertz M; Strech D; Kahrass H
Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 6(1):261. PubMed ID: 29258598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Current state of ethics literature synthesis: a systematic review of reviews.
Mertz M; Kahrass H; Strech D
BMC Med; 2016 Oct; 14(1):152. PubMed ID: 27716264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Systematic reviews of empirical literature on bioethical topics: Results from a meta-review.
Mertz M; Nobile H; Kahrass H
Nurs Ethics; 2020 Jun; 27(4):960-978. PubMed ID: 32238039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Argument-based medical ethics: a formal tool for critically appraising the normative medical ethics literature.
McCullough LB; Coverdale JH; Chervenak FA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Oct; 191(4):1097-102. PubMed ID: 15507927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Synthesising conceptual frameworks for patient and public involvement in research - a critical appraisal of a meta-narrative review.
Evans D; Hopewell-Kelly N; Kok M; White J
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Oct; 18(1):116. PubMed ID: 30359226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
Allen D; Rixson L
Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Systematic reviews in bioethics: types, challenges, and value.
McDougall R
J Med Philos; 2014 Feb; 39(1):89-97. PubMed ID: 24334289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].
Amato L; Colais P; Davoli M; Ferroni E; Fusco D; Minozzi S; Moirano F; Sciattella P; Vecchi S; Ventura M; Perucci CA
Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100. PubMed ID: 23851286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evidence-based ethics--what it should be and what it shouldn't.
Strech D
BMC Med Ethics; 2008 Oct; 9():16. PubMed ID: 18937838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ethics in systematic reviews.
Vergnes JN; Marchal-Sixou C; Nabet C; Maret D; Hamel O
J Med Ethics; 2010 Dec; 36(12):771-4. PubMed ID: 20952493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Conducting systematic reviews of economic evaluations.
Gomersall JS; Jadotte YT; Xue Y; Lockwood S; Riddle D; Preda A
Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):170-8. PubMed ID: 26288063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Systematic Reviews and Quality Appraisal of
Bracher M; Pilkington GJ; Pilkington K
Anticancer Res; 2021 Nov; 41(11):5377-5391. PubMed ID: 34732407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The German guideline clearing-project on bronchial asthma-part 1: Methodology and results of formal appraisal].
Thole H; Weingart O; Lampert U; Bassler D; Fessler J; Forster J; Franzen D; Geraedts M; Kroegel C; Mörike K; Schmitz M; Scholz R; Teske S; Ollenschläger G;
Pneumologie; 2003 Aug; 57(8):459-67. PubMed ID: 12928987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. How factual do we want the facts? Criteria for a critical appraisal of empirical research for use in ethics.
Strech D
J Med Ethics; 2010 Apr; 36(4):222-5. PubMed ID: 20338933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
