These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31727134)

  • 41. Systematic reviews in laboratory medicine: principles, processes and practical considerations.
    Horvath AR; Pewsner D
    Clin Chim Acta; 2004 Apr; 342(1-2):23-39. PubMed ID: 15026264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The effectiveness of public health nursing: the problems and solutions in carrying out a review of systematic reviews.
    Elliott L; Crombie IK; Irvine L; Cantrell J; Taylor J
    J Adv Nurs; 2004 Jan; 45(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 14705995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Effectiveness of stop smoking interventions among adults: protocol for an overview of systematic reviews and an updated systematic review.
    Hersi M; Traversy G; Thombs BD; Beck A; Skidmore B; Groulx S; Lang E; Reynolds DL; Wilson B; Bernstein SL; Selby P; Johnson-Obaseki S; Manuel D; Pakhale S; Presseau J; Courage S; Hutton B; Shea BJ; Welch V; Morrow M; Little J; Stevens A
    Syst Rev; 2019 Jan; 8(1):28. PubMed ID: 30660199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Constructing a systematic review for argument-based clinical ethics literature: the example of concealed medications.
    McCullough LB; Coverdale JH; Chervenak FA
    J Med Philos; 2007; 32(1):65-76. PubMed ID: 17365446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Incorporating Ethically Relevant Empirical Data From Systematic Review of Reasons: A Case Study of
    Torrance R; Yoon CH; Torrance AB; Tasker RC
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2020; 11(2):91-103. PubMed ID: 32160128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Clinical guidelines and payer policies on fusion for the treatment of chronic low back pain.
    Cheng JS; Lee MJ; Massicotte E; Ashman B; Gruenberg M; Pilcher LE; Skelly AC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Oct; 36(21 Suppl):S144-63. PubMed ID: 21952186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Locating and appraising systematic reviews.
    Hunt DL; McKibbon KA
    Ann Intern Med; 1997 Apr; 126(7):532-8. PubMed ID: 9092319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [A systematic review on population-based indicators of the quality of care in formal and informal provider networks and their application in health economic evaluations].
    Seibert K; Stiefler S; Domhoff D; Wolf-Ostermann K; Peschke D
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2019 Aug; 144-145():7-23. PubMed ID: 31327735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. How to Do a Systematic Review: A Best Practice Guide for Conducting and Reporting Narrative Reviews, Meta-Analyses, and Meta-Syntheses.
    Siddaway AP; Wood AM; Hedges LV
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2019 Jan; 70():747-770. PubMed ID: 30089228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on psoriasis: role of funding sources, conflict of interest and bibliometric indices as predictors of methodological quality.
    Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Gay-Mimbrera J; Maestre-Lopez B; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Carmona-Fernández PJ; González-Padilla M; Vélez García-Nieto A; Isla-Tejera B
    Br J Dermatol; 2017 Jun; 176(6):1633-1644. PubMed ID: 28192600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Key Steps in Conducting Systematic Reviews for Underpinning Clinical Practice Guidelines: Methodology of the European Association of Urology.
    Knoll T; Omar MI; Maclennan S; Hernández V; Canfield S; Yuan Y; Bruins M; Marconi L; Van Poppel H; N'Dow J; Sylvester R;
    Eur Urol; 2018 Feb; 73(2):290-300. PubMed ID: 28917594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Conducting systematic reviews of association (etiology): The Joanna Briggs Institute's approach.
    Moola S; Munn Z; Sears K; Sfetcu R; Currie M; Lisy K; Tufanaru C; Qureshi R; Mattis P; Mu P
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 26262566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Guidelines Clearing House Statement "Hypertension". Summary and recommendations for a rational hypertension guideline in Germany].
    Donner-Banzhoff N; Echterhoff HH; Hense HW; Kunz R; Sawicki P; Thürmann P; Jonitz G; Ollenschläger G
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2000 Jun; 94(5):341-9. PubMed ID: 10939145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Ethical issues in pragmatic randomized controlled trials: a review of the recent literature identifies gaps in ethical argumentation.
    Goldstein CE; Weijer C; Brehaut JC; Fergusson DA; Grimshaw JM; Horn AR; Taljaard M
    BMC Med Ethics; 2018 Feb; 19(1):14. PubMed ID: 29482537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Critical appraisal of stroke guidelines].
    Otten K; Geraedts M; Kugler C
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2006; 100(4):275-81. PubMed ID: 16878796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Evaluating characteristics of PROSPERO records as predictors of eventual publication of non-Cochrane systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study protocol.
    Ruano J; Gómez-García F; Gay-Mimbrera J; Aguilar-Luque M; Fernández-Rueda JL; Fernández-Chaichio J; Alcalde-Mellado P; Carmona-Fernandez PJ; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Viguera-Guerra I; Franco-García F; Cárdenas-Aranzana M; Romero JLH; Gonzalez-Padilla M; Isla-Tejera B; Garcia-Nieto AV
    Syst Rev; 2018 Mar; 7(1):43. PubMed ID: 29523200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Systematic reviews in context: highlighting systematic reviews relevant to Africa in the Pan African Medical Journal.
    Wiysonge CS; Kamadjeu R; Tsague L
    Pan Afr Med J; 2016; 24():180. PubMed ID: 27795777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [The medical literature stands to gain from critical appraisal. Commercialism and non-contextualized results under scrutiny].
    Werkö L
    Lakartidningen; 2002 Dec; 99(51-52):5172-5. PubMed ID: 12572312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Scientific basis of the OCRA method for risk assessment of biomechanical overload of upper limb, as preferred method in ISO standards on biomechanical risk factors.
    Colombini D; Occhipinti E
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jul; 44(4):436-438. PubMed ID: 29961081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.