These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3172748)

  • 1. Criterion validity of speech intelligibility rating-scale procedures for the hearing-impaired population.
    Samar VJ; Metz DE
    J Speech Hear Res; 1988 Sep; 31(3):307-16. PubMed ID: 3172748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contextual effects in the measurement of hearing-impaired speakers' intelligibility.
    Sitler RW; Schiavetti N; Metz DE
    J Speech Hear Res; 1983 Mar; 26(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 6865378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability of audiologists' ratings of the intelligibility of hearing-impaired children's speech.
    Doyle J
    Ear Hear; 1987 Jun; 8(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 3609513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability, sensitivity and validity of magnitude estimation, category scaling and paired-comparison judgements of speech intelligibility by older listeners.
    Purdy SC; Pavlovic CV
    Audiology; 1992; 31(5):254-71. PubMed ID: 1482505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An Investigation of the Clinical Use of a Single-Word Procedure to Assess Intelligibility (Swedish Test of Intelligibility for Children) and an Evaluation of the Validity and Reliability of the Intelligibility in Context Scale.
    Lagerberg TB; Hellström A; Lundberg E; Hartelius L
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Mar; 62(3):668-681. PubMed ID: 30950741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Criterion-related validity of the Test of Children's Speech sentence intelligibility measure for children with cerebral palsy and dysarthria.
    Hodge M; Gotzke CL
    Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2014 Aug; 16(4):417-26. PubMed ID: 25011401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Methodological aspects of assessing speech intelligibility among children with impaired hearing.
    Huttunen K; Sorri M
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2004 May; 124(4):490-4. PubMed ID: 15224881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing speech intelligibility of pathological speech: test types, ratings and transcription measures.
    Xue W; van Hout R; Cucchiarini C; Strik H
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2023 Jan; 37(1):52-76. PubMed ID: 34955083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of items for a speech intelligibility assessment scale.
    Souza AP; Marques JM; Scott LC
    Pro Fono; 2010; 22(3):325-32. PubMed ID: 21103726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scaling and transcription measures of intelligibility for populations with disordered speech.
    Tye-Murray N; Barkmeier J; Folkins JW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Jun; 34(3):697-702. PubMed ID: 2072696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Construct-related validity of the TOCS measures: comparison of intelligibility and speaking rate scores in children with and without speech disorders.
    Hodge MM; Gotzke CL
    J Commun Disord; 2014; 51():51-63. PubMed ID: 25069811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Toward measuring how well hearing-impaired children speak.
    Monsen RB
    J Speech Hear Res; 1978 Jun; 21(2):197-219. PubMed ID: 703272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acoustic dimensions of hearing-impaired speakers' intelligibility.
    Metz DE; Samar VJ; Schiavetti N; Sitler RW; Whitehead RL
    J Speech Hear Res; 1985 Sep; 28(3):345-55. PubMed ID: 4046575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of intelligibility using children's spontaneous speech: methodological aspects.
    Lagerberg TB; Åsberg J; Hartelius L; Persson C
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2014; 49(2):228-39. PubMed ID: 24304870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceptual evaluation of hypernasality, audible nasal airflow and speech understandability using ordinal and visual analogue scaling and their relation with nasalance scores.
    Bettens K; Bruneel L; Maryn Y; De Bodt M; Luyten A; Van Lierde KM
    J Commun Disord; 2018; 76():11-20. PubMed ID: 30071470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of objective and subjective measures of speech intelligibility in elderly hearing-impaired listeners.
    Cox RM; Alexander GC; Rivera IM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Aug; 34(4):904-15. PubMed ID: 1956197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interobserver reliability using the Phonetic Level Evaluation with severely and profoundly hearing-impaired children.
    Shaw S; Coggins TE
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Oct; 34(5):989-99. PubMed ID: 1749253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rasch analysis of word identification and magnitude estimation scaling responses in measuring naive listeners' judgments of speech intelligibility of children with severe-to-profound hearing impairments.
    Beltyukova SA; Stone GM; Ellis LW
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 51(5):1124-37. PubMed ID: 18664707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability and agreement of ratings of ataxic dysarthric speech samples with varying intelligibility.
    Sheard C; Adams RD; Davis PJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Apr; 34(2):285-93. PubMed ID: 2046353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Construct validity of direct magnitude estimation and interval scaling of speech intelligibility: evidence from a study of the hearing impaired.
    Schiavetti N; Metz DE; Sitler RW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1981 Sep; 24(3):441-5. PubMed ID: 7300287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.