These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3172768)

  • 1. Some theoretical considerations concerning the relation between functional gain and insertion gain.
    Stelmachowicz PG; Lewis DE
    J Speech Hear Res; 1988 Sep; 31(3):491-6. PubMed ID: 3172768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Aided masked thresholds: case of deception.
    Balfour PB; Hawkins DB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1993 Jul; 4(4):272-4. PubMed ID: 8369546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of hearing aid fittings using insertion gain measurements.
    Ringdahl A; Leijon A; Lidén G
    Scand Audiol; 1984; 13(3):179-85. PubMed ID: 6494804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An alternate method for determining functional gain of hearing aids.
    Rines D; Stelmachowicz PG; Gorga MP
    J Speech Hear Res; 1984 Dec; 27(4):627-33. PubMed ID: 6521471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relationship of acoustic gain to aided threshold improvement in children.
    Jirsa RE; Norris TW
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1978 Aug; 43(3):348-52. PubMed ID: 692100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors which affect measures of speech audibility with hearing aids.
    Popelka GR; Mason DI
    Ear Hear; 1987 Oct; 8(5 Suppl):109S-118S. PubMed ID: 3678649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sound quality judgements of new hearing instrument users over a 24-week post-fitting period.
    Munro KJ; Lutman ME
    Int J Audiol; 2005 Feb; 44(2):92-101. PubMed ID: 15913157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The present state of hearing-aid use in three schools for the hearing impaired in Britain.
    Nakanishi Y
    Br J Audiol; 1981 May; 15(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 7225646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hearing aid evaluation: predicting speech gain from insertion gain.
    Dillon H
    J Speech Hear Res; 1993 Jun; 36(3):621-33. PubMed ID: 8331918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of functional gain and 2 cm3 coupler gain.
    Hawkins DB; Haskell GB
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1982 Feb; 47(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 7176579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical ear canal probe tube measurements.
    Hawkins DB
    Ear Hear; 1987 Oct; 8(5 Suppl):74S-81S. PubMed ID: 3678654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A reexamination of the one-half gain rule.
    Berger KW; Hagberg EN; Rane RL
    Ear Hear; 1980; 1(4):223-5. PubMed ID: 7409361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measuring in-the-ear gain of hearing aids by the acoustic reflex method.
    Tonisson W
    J Speech Hear Res; 1975 Mar; 18(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 1127901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of hearing-aid gain using functional, coupler, and probe-tube measurements.
    Mason D; Popelka GR
    J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Jun; 29(2):218-26. PubMed ID: 3724114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Examination of two issues concerning functional gain measurements.
    Hawkins DB; Montgomery AA; Prosek RA; Walden BE
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1987 Feb; 52(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 3807346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Probe-determined hearing-aid gain compared to functional and coupler gains.
    Zemplenyi J; Dirks D; Gilman S
    J Speech Hear Res; 1985 Sep; 28(3):394-404. PubMed ID: 4046580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Maximum real-ear gain of in-the-ear hearing aids.
    Erickson FN; Van Tasell DJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Apr; 34(2):351-9. PubMed ID: 2046359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of extended-range frequency-response amplification in hearing aids.
    Forrester JI; Raffin MJ
    J Aud Res; 1982 Jan; 22(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 7187908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of two methods for estimating the sensation level of amplified speech.
    Seewald RC; Hudson SP; Gagné JP; Zelisko DL
    Ear Hear; 1992 Jun; 13(3):142-9. PubMed ID: 1397753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of CIC and BTE hearing aids for three-dimensional localization of speech.
    Best V; Kalluri S; McLachlan S; Valentine S; Edwards B; Carlile S
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Oct; 49(10):723-32. PubMed ID: 20515424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.