These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31728573)

  • 1. [Speech recognition with hearing aids for 10 standard audiograms].
    Dörfler C; Hocke T; Hast A; Hoppe U
    HNO; 2020 Jan; 68(1):40-47. PubMed ID: 31728573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech recognition with hearing aids for 10 standard audiograms : English version.
    Dörfler C; Hocke T; Hast A; Hoppe U
    HNO; 2020 Aug; 68(Suppl 2):93-99. PubMed ID: 32211930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Effectiveness of hearing aid provision for severe hearing loss].
    Engler M; Digeser F; Hoppe U
    HNO; 2022 Jul; 70(7):520-532. PubMed ID: 35061063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Role of cochlear reserve in adults with cochlear implants following post-lingual hearing loss.
    Thangavelu K; Nitzge M; Weiß RM; Mueller-Mazzotta J; Stuck BA; Reimann K
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2023 Mar; 280(3):1063-1071. PubMed ID: 35947149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Benefits of amplification for unaided speech discrimination in age-related hearing loss with flat type audiogram.
    Ito A; Fukuda S; Shimozawa M; Abe K; Kumada J; Nakaya M
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2023 Feb; 50(1):62-69. PubMed ID: 35643884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech Perception and Information-Carrying Capacity for Hearing Aid Users of Different Ages.
    Hoppe U; Hocke T; Müller A; Hast A
    Audiol Neurootol; 2016; 21 Suppl 1():16-20. PubMed ID: 27806356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The age effect in evaluation of hearing aid benefits by speech audiometry].
    Müller A; Hocke T; Hoppe U; Mir-Salim P
    HNO; 2016 Mar; 64(3):143-8. PubMed ID: 26801889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cochlear Implantation in Candidates With Moderate-to-Severe Hearing Loss and Poor Speech Perception.
    Hoppe U; Hocke T; Hast A; Iro H
    Laryngoscope; 2021 Mar; 131(3):E940-E945. PubMed ID: 32484949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Speech perception with hearing aids in comparison to pure-tone hearing loss].
    Hoppe U; Hast A; Hocke T
    HNO; 2014 Jun; 62(6):443-8. PubMed ID: 24633376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Influence of hearing aids on monosyllabic test score and subjective everyday hearing].
    Thümmler R; Liebscher T; Hoppe U
    HNO; 2016 Aug; 64(8):595-600. PubMed ID: 27126291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pure tone audiograms from hearing-impaired children. II. Predicting speech-hearing from the audiogram.
    Bamford JM; Wilson IM; Atkinson D; Bench J
    Br J Audiol; 1981 Feb; 15(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 7214068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of Maximal Speech Intelligibility With Vibrant Soundbridge in Patients With Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
    Lee HJ; Lee JM; Choi JY; Jung J
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Oct; 38(9):1246-1250. PubMed ID: 28806311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Low-Level Speech Recognition of Children with Hearing Aids.
    Wolfe J; Duke M; Miller S; Schafer E; Jones C; Rakita L; Dunn A; Battles J; Neumann S; Manning J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2022 Apr; 33(4):196-205. PubMed ID: 34758503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-term effects of hearing aids on word recognition scores.
    Song JE; Tanaka SM; Pinto JM; Rasmussen B; Ferro LM; Saadia-Redleaf MI
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2011 May; 120(5):314-9. PubMed ID: 21675587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. High-frequency audibility: the effects of audiometric configuration, stimulus type, and device.
    Kimlinger C; McCreery R; Lewis D
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Feb; 26(2):128-37. PubMed ID: 25690773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Effect of Monaurally Fitted Hearing Aid Use on the Evolution of Presbycusis.
    Dunya G; Najem F; Mailhac A; Abou Rizk S; Bassim M
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2021 Sep; 130(9):1093-1099. PubMed ID: 33615825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Active middle ear implant compared with open-fit hearing aid in sloping high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
    Boeheim K; Pok SM; Schloegel M; Filzmoser P
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Apr; 31(3):424-9. PubMed ID: 20042907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech recognition performance of patients with sensorineural hearing loss under unaided and aided conditions using linear and compression hearing AIDS.
    Shanks JE; Wilson RH; Larson V; Williams D
    Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):280-90. PubMed ID: 12195170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Direct Acoustic Cochlear Implants Lead to an Improved Speech Perception Gap Compared to Conventional Hearing Aid.
    Maier H; Lenarz T; Dolležal LV; Busch S
    Otol Neurotol; 2018 Oct; 39(9):1147-1152. PubMed ID: 30106855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.