BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

470 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31728754)

  • 1. Outcomes in rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic low anterior resection compared to open: a propensity-matched analysis of the NCDB (2010-2015).
    Chapman BC; Edgcomb M; Gleisner A; Vogel JD
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Nov; 34(11):4754-4771. PubMed ID: 31728754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of surgical approach on short-term oncological outcomes and recovery following low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
    Hyde LZ; Baser O; Mehendale S; Guo D; Shah M; Kiran RP
    Colorectal Dis; 2019 Aug; 21(8):932-942. PubMed ID: 31062521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Low Anterior Resection: Equivalent Survival in a National Analysis of 14,033 Patients With Rectal Cancer.
    Sun Z; Kim J; Adam MA; Nussbaum DP; Speicher PJ; Mantyh CR; Migaly J
    Ann Surg; 2016 Jun; 263(6):1152-8. PubMed ID: 26501702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robotic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer: A National Perspective on Short-term Oncologic Outcomes.
    Speicher PJ; Englum BR; Ganapathi AM; Nussbaum DP; Mantyh CR; Migaly J
    Ann Surg; 2015 Dec; 262(6):1040-5. PubMed ID: 25405559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Oncologic and Perioperative Outcomes of Laparoscopic, Open, and Robotic Approaches for Rectal Cancer Resection: A Multicenter, Propensity Score-Weighted Cohort Study.
    Kethman WC; Harris AHS; Morris AM; Shelton A; Kirilcuk N; Kin C
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2020 Jan; 63(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 31764247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Comparison of Pathologic Outcomes of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Resections for Rectal Cancer Using the ACS-NSQIP Proctectomy-Targeted Database: a Propensity Score Analysis.
    Garfinkle R; Abou-Khalil M; Bhatnagar S; Wong-Chong N; Azoulay L; Morin N; Vasilevsky CA; Boutros M
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2019 Feb; 23(2):348-356. PubMed ID: 30264386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of early experience of robotic and transanal total mesorectal excision using propensity score matching.
    Law WL; Foo DCC
    Surg Endosc; 2019 Mar; 33(3):757-763. PubMed ID: 30014329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Superior pathologic and clinical outcomes after minimally invasive rectal cancer resection, compared to open resection.
    Lee GC; Bordeianou LG; Francone TD; Blaszkowsky LS; Goldstone RN; Ricciardi R; Kunitake H; Qadan M
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Aug; 34(8):3435-3448. PubMed ID: 31844971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality of total mesorectal excision and depth of circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer: a matched comparison of the first 20 robotic cases.
    Barnajian M; Pettet D; Kazi E; Foppa C; Bergamaschi R
    Colorectal Dis; 2014 Aug; 16(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 24750995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robotic, transanal, and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for locally advanced mid/low rectal cancer: European multicentre, propensity score-matched study.
    de'Angelis N; Marchegiani F; Martínez-Pérez A; Biondi A; Pucciarelli S; Schena CA; Pellino G; Kraft M; van Lieshout AS; Morelli L; Valverde A; Lupinacci RM; Gómez-Abril SA; Persiani R; Tuynman JB; Espin-Basany E; Ris F;
    BJS Open; 2024 May; 8(3):. PubMed ID: 38805357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Resection for Mid and Low Rectal Cancers.
    Bedirli A; Salman B; Yuksel O
    JSLS; 2016; 20(1):. PubMed ID: 27081292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robotic Resection is a Good Prognostic Factor in Rectal Cancer Compared with Laparoscopic Resection: Long-term Survival Analysis Using Propensity Score Matching.
    Kim J; Baek SJ; Kang DW; Roh YE; Lee JW; Kwak HD; Kwak JM; Kim SH
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2017 Mar; 60(3):266-273. PubMed ID: 28177988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer: Laparoscopic vs robotic surgery.
    Feroci F; Vannucchi A; Bianchi PP; Cantafio S; Garzi A; Formisano G; Scatizzi M
    World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Apr; 22(13):3602-10. PubMed ID: 27053852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Short-term efficacy of robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision with and without lateral lymph node dissection for mid-low advanced rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis].
    Shi FY; Zhang L; Qin Q; Jin X; Hu CH; Yu TY; Ma L; Wang GH; Wu H; Xia P; Sun XJ; She JJ
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 23(4):370-376. PubMed ID: 32306605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The circumferential resection margins status: A comparison of robotic, laparoscopic and open total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer.
    de Jesus JP; Valadão M; de Castro Araujo RO; Cesar D; Linhares E; Iglesias AC
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Jun; 42(6):808-12. PubMed ID: 27038996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laparoscopic versus open low anterior resection for rectal cancer: results from the national cancer data base.
    Nussbaum DP; Speicher PJ; Ganapathi AM; Englum BR; Keenan JE; Mantyh CR; Migaly J
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2015 Jan; 19(1):124-31; discussion 131-2. PubMed ID: 25091847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection for sphincter-saving surgery: pathological and short-term outcomes in a single-center analysis of 130 consecutive patients.
    Valverde A; Goasguen N; Oberlin O; Svrcek M; Fléjou JF; Sezeur A; Mosnier H; Houdart R; Lupinacci RM
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4085-4091. PubMed ID: 28271268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) versus laparoscopic TME for MRI-defined low rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis of oncological outcomes.
    Roodbeen SX; Penna M; Mackenzie H; Kusters M; Slater A; Jones OM; Lindsey I; Guy RJ; Cunningham C; Hompes R
    Surg Endosc; 2019 Aug; 33(8):2459-2467. PubMed ID: 30350103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing pathologic outcomes for robotic versus laparoscopic Surgery in rectal cancer resection: a propensity adjusted analysis of 7616 patients.
    Hopkins MB; Geiger TM; Bethurum AJ; Ford MM; Muldoon RL; Beck DE; Stewart TG; Hawkins AT
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Jun; 34(6):2613-2622. PubMed ID: 31346754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What have we gained by performing robotic rectal resection? Evaluation of 64 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic low anterior resection for rectal adenocarcinoma.
    Erguner I; Aytac E; Boler DE; Atalar B; Baca B; Karahasanoglu T; Hamzaoglu I; Uras C
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2013 Jun; 23(3):316-9. PubMed ID: 23752000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.