These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

488 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31728754)

  • 1. Outcomes in rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic low anterior resection compared to open: a propensity-matched analysis of the NCDB (2010-2015).
    Chapman BC; Edgcomb M; Gleisner A; Vogel JD
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Nov; 34(11):4754-4771. PubMed ID: 31728754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of surgical approach on short-term oncological outcomes and recovery following low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
    Hyde LZ; Baser O; Mehendale S; Guo D; Shah M; Kiran RP
    Colorectal Dis; 2019 Aug; 21(8):932-942. PubMed ID: 31062521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Low Anterior Resection: Equivalent Survival in a National Analysis of 14,033 Patients With Rectal Cancer.
    Sun Z; Kim J; Adam MA; Nussbaum DP; Speicher PJ; Mantyh CR; Migaly J
    Ann Surg; 2016 Jun; 263(6):1152-8. PubMed ID: 26501702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robotic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer: A National Perspective on Short-term Oncologic Outcomes.
    Speicher PJ; Englum BR; Ganapathi AM; Nussbaum DP; Mantyh CR; Migaly J
    Ann Surg; 2015 Dec; 262(6):1040-5. PubMed ID: 25405559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Association of Surgical Approaches and Outcomes in Total Mesorectal Excision and Margin Status for Rectal Cancer.
    Mirza MB; Gamboa AC; Irlmeier R; Hopkins B; Regenbogen SE; Hrebinko KA; Holder-Murray J; Wiseman JT; Ejaz A; Wise PE; Ye F; Idrees K; Hawkins AT; Balch GC; Khan A
    J Surg Res; 2024 Aug; 300():494-502. PubMed ID: 38875948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Oncologic and Perioperative Outcomes of Laparoscopic, Open, and Robotic Approaches for Rectal Cancer Resection: A Multicenter, Propensity Score-Weighted Cohort Study.
    Kethman WC; Harris AHS; Morris AM; Shelton A; Kirilcuk N; Kin C
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2020 Jan; 63(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 31764247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Comparison of Pathologic Outcomes of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Resections for Rectal Cancer Using the ACS-NSQIP Proctectomy-Targeted Database: a Propensity Score Analysis.
    Garfinkle R; Abou-Khalil M; Bhatnagar S; Wong-Chong N; Azoulay L; Morin N; Vasilevsky CA; Boutros M
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2019 Feb; 23(2):348-356. PubMed ID: 30264386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of early experience of robotic and transanal total mesorectal excision using propensity score matching.
    Law WL; Foo DCC
    Surg Endosc; 2019 Mar; 33(3):757-763. PubMed ID: 30014329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Superior pathologic and clinical outcomes after minimally invasive rectal cancer resection, compared to open resection.
    Lee GC; Bordeianou LG; Francone TD; Blaszkowsky LS; Goldstone RN; Ricciardi R; Kunitake H; Qadan M
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Aug; 34(8):3435-3448. PubMed ID: 31844971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality of total mesorectal excision and depth of circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer: a matched comparison of the first 20 robotic cases.
    Barnajian M; Pettet D; Kazi E; Foppa C; Bergamaschi R
    Colorectal Dis; 2014 Aug; 16(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 24750995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robotic, transanal, and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for locally advanced mid/low rectal cancer: European multicentre, propensity score-matched study.
    de'Angelis N; Marchegiani F; Martínez-Pérez A; Biondi A; Pucciarelli S; Schena CA; Pellino G; Kraft M; van Lieshout AS; Morelli L; Valverde A; Lupinacci RM; Gómez-Abril SA; Persiani R; Tuynman JB; Espin-Basany E; Ris F;
    BJS Open; 2024 May; 8(3):. PubMed ID: 38805357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Resection for Mid and Low Rectal Cancers.
    Bedirli A; Salman B; Yuksel O
    JSLS; 2016; 20(1):. PubMed ID: 27081292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robotic Resection is a Good Prognostic Factor in Rectal Cancer Compared with Laparoscopic Resection: Long-term Survival Analysis Using Propensity Score Matching.
    Kim J; Baek SJ; Kang DW; Roh YE; Lee JW; Kwak HD; Kwak JM; Kim SH
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2017 Mar; 60(3):266-273. PubMed ID: 28177988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer: Laparoscopic vs robotic surgery.
    Feroci F; Vannucchi A; Bianchi PP; Cantafio S; Garzi A; Formisano G; Scatizzi M
    World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Apr; 22(13):3602-10. PubMed ID: 27053852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Short-term efficacy of robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision with and without lateral lymph node dissection for mid-low advanced rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis].
    Shi FY; Zhang L; Qin Q; Jin X; Hu CH; Yu TY; Ma L; Wang GH; Wu H; Xia P; Sun XJ; She JJ
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 23(4):370-376. PubMed ID: 32306605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The circumferential resection margins status: A comparison of robotic, laparoscopic and open total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer.
    de Jesus JP; Valadão M; de Castro Araujo RO; Cesar D; Linhares E; Iglesias AC
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Jun; 42(6):808-12. PubMed ID: 27038996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laparoscopic versus open low anterior resection for rectal cancer: results from the national cancer data base.
    Nussbaum DP; Speicher PJ; Ganapathi AM; Englum BR; Keenan JE; Mantyh CR; Migaly J
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2015 Jan; 19(1):124-31; discussion 131-2. PubMed ID: 25091847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection for sphincter-saving surgery: pathological and short-term outcomes in a single-center analysis of 130 consecutive patients.
    Valverde A; Goasguen N; Oberlin O; Svrcek M; Fléjou JF; Sezeur A; Mosnier H; Houdart R; Lupinacci RM
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4085-4091. PubMed ID: 28271268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) versus laparoscopic TME for MRI-defined low rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis of oncological outcomes.
    Roodbeen SX; Penna M; Mackenzie H; Kusters M; Slater A; Jones OM; Lindsey I; Guy RJ; Cunningham C; Hompes R
    Surg Endosc; 2019 Aug; 33(8):2459-2467. PubMed ID: 30350103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing pathologic outcomes for robotic versus laparoscopic Surgery in rectal cancer resection: a propensity adjusted analysis of 7616 patients.
    Hopkins MB; Geiger TM; Bethurum AJ; Ford MM; Muldoon RL; Beck DE; Stewart TG; Hawkins AT
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Jun; 34(6):2613-2622. PubMed ID: 31346754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.