These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3172953)

  • 1. Comparative studies of speech processing strategies for cochlear implants.
    Wilson BS; Finley CC; Farmer JC; Lawson DT; Weber BA; Wolford RD; Kenan PD; White MW; Merzenich MM; Schindler RA
    Laryngoscope; 1988 Oct; 98(10):1069-77. PubMed ID: 3172953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of speech processing strategies used in the Clarion implant processor.
    Loizou PC; Stickney G; Mishra L; Assmann P
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 12598809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Design and evaluation of a continuous interleaved sampling (CIS) processing strategy for multichannel cochlear implants.
    Wilson BS; Finley CC; Lawson DT; Wolford RD; Zerbi M
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):110-6. PubMed ID: 8263821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. State of the art of cochlear implants. The UCSF experience.
    Schindler RA; Kessler DK
    Am J Otol; 1989 Mar; 10(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 2660581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speech discrimination via cochlear implants with two different digital speech processing strategies: preliminary results for 7 patients.
    Dillier N; Bögli H; Spillmann T
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():145-53. PubMed ID: 8153560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS; Kreft HA
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech recognition with a CIS strategy for the ineraid multichannel cochlear implant.
    Boëx C; Pelizzone M; Montandon P
    Am J Otol; 1996 Jan; 17(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 8694136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Better speech recognition with cochlear implants.
    Wilson BS; Finley CC; Lawson DT; Wolford RD; Eddington DK; Rabinowitz WM
    Nature; 1991 Jul; 352(6332):236-8. PubMed ID: 1857418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance of subjects fit with the Advanced Bionics CII and Nucleus 3G cochlear implant devices.
    Spahr AJ; Dorman MF
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 May; 130(5):624-8. PubMed ID: 15148187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The University of California, San Francisco/Storz cochlear implant program.
    Schindler RA; Kessler DK; Rebscher SJ; Yanda J
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1986 May; 19(2):287-305. PubMed ID: 3520442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bilateral cochlear implants controlled by a single speech processor.
    Lawson DT; Wilson BS; Zerbi M; van den Honert C; Finley CC; Farmer JC; McElveen JT; Roush PA
    Am J Otol; 1998 Nov; 19(6):758-61. PubMed ID: 9831150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Considerations on the rehabilitation of the hearing in cochlear implant patients].
    Amadori M; Pantano N; Cestaro A; Babighian G
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1996 Aug; 16(4):324-33. PubMed ID: 9082826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech tracking in the evaluation of a multichannel cochlear prosthesis.
    Jenkins H; Chmiel R; Jerger J
    Laryngoscope; 1989 Mar; 99(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 2918797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Cochlear implants].
    Lehnhardt E; Battmer RD; Nakahodo K; Laszig R
    HNO; 1986 Jul; 34(7):271-9. PubMed ID: 3755709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A novel speech-processing strategy incorporating tonal information for cochlear implants.
    Lan N; Nie KB; Gao SK; Zeng FG
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 May; 51(5):752-60. PubMed ID: 15132501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. New cochlear implant coding strategy for tonal language speakers.
    Wong LL; Vandali AE; Ciocca V; Luk B; Ip VW; Murray B; Yu HC; Chung I
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Jun; 47(6):337-47. PubMed ID: 18569106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance of prelingually and postlingually deaf patients using single-channel or multichannel cochlear implants.
    Hinderink JB; Mens LH; Brokx JP; van den Broek P
    Laryngoscope; 1995 Jun; 105(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 7769946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The UCSF/Storz cochlear implant: patient performance.
    Schindler RA; Kessler DK
    Am J Otol; 1987 May; 8(3):247-55. PubMed ID: 3307448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spectral and temporal cues in cochlear implant speech perception.
    Nie K; Barco A; Zeng FG
    Ear Hear; 2006 Apr; 27(2):208-17. PubMed ID: 16518146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech perception with the ACE and the SPEAK speech coding strategies for children implanted with the Nucleus cochlear implant.
    Manrique M; Huarte A; Morera C; Caballé L; Ramos A; Castillo C; García-Ibáñez L; Estrada E; Juan E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2005 Dec; 69(12):1667-74. PubMed ID: 16168497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.