These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

63 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3172953)

  • 21. New processing strategies in cochlear implantation.
    Wilson BS; Lawson DT; Zerbi M; Finley CC; Wolford RD
    Am J Otol; 1995 Sep; 16(5):669-75. PubMed ID: 8588675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Noise signal reduction in cochlear implant speech processors].
    Müller-Deile J
    HNO; 1995 Sep; 43(9):545-51. PubMed ID: 7591867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Electrodographic analysis and field evaluation of the Speak coding strategy.
    Dillier N; Bögli H; Lai WK
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():354-6. PubMed ID: 7668703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Audiologic results with the MSP/MPEAK and WSP/F0F1F2 processors and coding strategies for the nucleus cochlear implant.
    Pijl S
    J Otolaryngol; 1994 Aug; 23(4):286-91. PubMed ID: 7996630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Clinical trials with a 22-channel cochlear prosthesis.
    Cohen NL; Waltzman SB; Shapiro WH
    Laryngoscope; 1985 Dec; 95(12):1448-54. PubMed ID: 3906323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Initial results with simultaneous analog and pulsatile stimulation of the cochlea.
    von Wallenberg EL; Hochmair ES; Hochmair-Desoyer IJ
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():140-9. PubMed ID: 2356720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Multichannel cochlear implantation: Utah-design.
    Parkin JL; Stewart BE
    Laryngoscope; 1988 Mar; 98(3):262-5. PubMed ID: 3343876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Vienna cochlear implant program.
    Burian K; Hochmair-Desoyer IJ; Eisenwort B
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1986 May; 19(2):313-28. PubMed ID: 3754952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The UCSF/Storz multichannel cochlear implant: patient results.
    Schindler RA; Kessler DK; Rebscher SJ; Yanda JL; Jackler RK
    Laryngoscope; 1986 Jun; 96(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 3754921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. New processing strategies for multichannel cochlear prostheses.
    Lawson DT; Wilson BS; Finley CC
    Prog Brain Res; 1993; 97():313-21. PubMed ID: 8234758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cochlear implants: update of the program at the University of British Columbia.
    Doyle PJ; Pijl S
    J Otolaryngol; 1989 Feb; 18(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 2921781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Coding strategies for multichannel cochlear prostheses.
    Wilson BS; Lawson DT; Finley CC; Wolford RD
    Am J Otol; 1991; 12 Suppl():56-61. PubMed ID: 2069190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Surgical considerations and hearing results with the UCSF/Storz cochlear implant.
    Schindler RA; Kessler DK; Rebscher SJ; Jackler RK; Merzenich MM
    Laryngoscope; 1987 Jan; 97(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 3796176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of different speech processing strategies on patients receiving the same implant.
    Simmons FB; Dent LJ; Van Compernolle D
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1986; 95(1 Pt 1):71-5. PubMed ID: 3753836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A 12-consonant confusion study on a multiple-channel cochlear implant patient.
    Dowell RC; Martin LF; Tong YC; Clark GM; Seligman PM; Patrick JF
    J Speech Hear Res; 1982 Dec; 25(4):509-16. PubMed ID: 6897661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Importance of patient and processor variables in determining outcomes with cochlear implants.
    Wilson BS; Lawson DT; Finley CC; Wolford RD
    J Speech Hear Res; 1993 Apr; 36(2):373-9. PubMed ID: 8487529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Consonant sounds processing in 22 channel cochlear implant device and consonant recognition of patients].
    Kawai S
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1993 Feb; 96(2):238-48. PubMed ID: 8463888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Coding considerations in design of cochlear prostheses.
    Merzenich MM; White M
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1980; 89(5 Pt 2):84-7. PubMed ID: 6786198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effects of signal processing by the House-Urban single-channel stimulator on auditory perception abilities of patients with cochlear implants.
    Edgerton BJ; Doyle KJ; Brimacombe JA; Danley MJ; Fretz RJ
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1983; 405():311-22. PubMed ID: 6575654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Results for some patients with cochlear implants on the minimal auditory capabilities (MAC) battery.
    Owens E; Kessler D; Raggio M
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1983; 405():443-50. PubMed ID: 6575666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.