245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31729620)
1. Stapled versus handsewn methods for ileocolic anastomoses.
Luglio G; Corcione F
Tech Coloproctol; 2019 Nov; 23(11):1093-1095. PubMed ID: 31729620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stapled versus handsewn methods for ileocolic anastomoses.
Choy PY; Bissett IP; Docherty JG; Parry BR; Merrie AE
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Jul; (3):CD004320. PubMed ID: 17636751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stapled versus handsewn methods for ileocolic anastomoses.
Choy PY; Bissett IP; Docherty JG; Parry BR; Merrie A; Fitzgerald A
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2011 Sep; (9):CD004320. PubMed ID: 21901690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Increased Leak Rates Following Stapled Versus Handsewn Ileocolic Anastomosis in Patients with Right-Sided Colon Cancer: A Nationwide Cohort Study.
Nordholm-Carstensen A; Schnack Rasmussen M; Krarup PM
Dis Colon Rectum; 2019 May; 62(5):542-548. PubMed ID: 30489322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Short-term complications of wide-lumen stapled anastomosis after ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease: who is at risk?
Riss S; Bittermann C; Zandl S; Kristo I; Stift A; Papay P; Vogelsang H; Mittlböck M; Herbst F
Colorectal Dis; 2010 Oct; 12(10 Online):e298-303. PubMed ID: 20041915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stapled versus handsewn methods for colorectal anastomosis surgery.
Neutzling CB; Lustosa SA; Proenca IM; da Silva EM; Matos D
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Feb; (2):CD003144. PubMed ID: 22336786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stapled versus handsewn methods for colorectal anastomosis surgery.
Lustosa SA; Matos D; Atallah AN; Castro AA
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2001; (3):CD003144. PubMed ID: 11687041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Risk factors for leak, complications and mortality after ileocolic anastomosis: comparison of two anastomotic techniques.
Sánchez-Guillén L; Frasson M; García-Granero Á; Pellino G; Flor-Lorente B; Álvarez-Sarrado E; García-Granero E
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2019 Nov; 101(8):571-578. PubMed ID: 31672036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimising surgical anastomosis in ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease with respect to recurrence and functionality: two international parallel randomized controlled trials comparing handsewn (END-to-end or Kono-S) to stapled anastomosis (HAND2END and the End2End STUDIES).
Haanappel AEG; Bellato V; Buskens CJ; Armuzzi A; van der Bilt JDW; de Boer NKH; Danese S; van der Does de Willebois EML; Duijvestein M; van der Horst D; Pellino G; Richir MC; Selvaggi F; Spinelli A; Vignali A; Rosati R; Bemelman WA
BMC Surg; 2024 Feb; 24(1):71. PubMed ID: 38408943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Side-to-side stapled anastomosis strongly reduces anastomotic leak rates in Crohn's disease surgery.
Resegotti A; Astegiano M; Farina EC; Ciccone G; Avagnina G; Giustetto A; Campra D; Fronda GR
Dis Colon Rectum; 2005 Mar; 48(3):464-8. PubMed ID: 15719193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stapled side-to-side anastomosis might be better than handsewn end-to-end anastomosis in ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease: a meta-analysis.
He X; Chen Z; Huang J; Lian L; Rouniyar S; Wu X; Lan P
Dig Dis Sci; 2014 Jul; 59(7):1544-51. PubMed ID: 24500450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Higher frequency of anastomotic leakage with stapled compared to hand-sewn ileocolic anastomosis in a large population-based study.
Gustafsson P; Jestin P; Gunnarsson U; Lindforss U
World J Surg; 2015 Jul; 39(7):1834-9. PubMed ID: 25708508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does advancement in stapling technology with triple-row and enhanced staple configurations confer additional safety? A matched comparison of 340 stapled ileocolic anastomoses.
Foo CC; Chiu AHO; Yip J; Law WL
Surg Endosc; 2018 Jul; 32(7):3122-3130. PubMed ID: 29340808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of anastomotic techniques on postoperative anastomotic complications: Results of the Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit.
Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit study group on behalf of the West Midlands Research Collaborative
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2022 Sep; 164(3):674-684.e5. PubMed ID: 35249756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does Oversewing Stapled Ileocolic Anastomoses for Crohn's Disease Reduce Anastomotic Complications? An Inverse-Probability Weighting Analysis of a Single Centre Cohort.
Yang ML; Brar MS; Boughn A; Saini J; Kennedy E; MacRae H; de Buck Van Overstraten A
J Gastrointest Surg; 2022 Sep; 26(9):1951-1953. PubMed ID: 35178650
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The impact of stapling technique and surgeon specialism on anastomotic failure after right-sided colorectal resection: an international multicentre, prospective audit.
2015 European Society of Coloproctology Collaborating Group
Colorectal Dis; 2018 Nov; 20(11):1028-1040. PubMed ID: 29920945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Compression versus hand-sewn and stapled anastomosis in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Slesser AA; Pellino G; Shariq O; Cocker D; Kontovounisios C; Rasheed S; Tekkis PP
Tech Coloproctol; 2016 Oct; 20(10):667-76. PubMed ID: 27554096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ileocolic anastomosis after right hemicolectomy: stapled end-to-side, stapled side-to-side, or handsewn?
Rajan R; Arachchi A; Metlapalli M; Lo J; Ratinam R; Nguyen TC; Teoh WMK; Lim JT; Chouhan H
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2022 Mar; 37(3):673-681. PubMed ID: 35124716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Isoperistaltic versus antiperistaltic ileocolic anastomosis. Does it really matter? Results from a randomised clinical trial (ISOVANTI).
Ibáñez N; Abrisqueta J; Luján J; Hernández Q; Rufete MD; Parrilla P
Surg Endosc; 2019 Sep; 33(9):2850-2857. PubMed ID: 30426254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical impact of leakage in patients with handsewn vs stapled anastomosis after right hemicolectomy: a retrospective study.
Espin E; Vallribera F; Kreisler E; Biondo S
Colorectal Dis; 2020 Oct; 22(10):1286-1292. PubMed ID: 32348603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
