These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31729675)

  • 21. Upbeat: Augmented Reality-Guided Dancing for Prosthetic Rehabilitation of Upper Limb Amputees.
    Melero M; Hou A; Cheng E; Tayade A; Lee SC; Unberath M; Navab N
    J Healthc Eng; 2019; 2019():2163705. PubMed ID: 31015903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Computational approaches to decode grasping force and velocity level in upper-limb amputee from intraneural peripheral signals.
    Cracchiolo M; Panarese A; Valle G; Strauss I; Granata G; Iorio RD; Stieglitz T; Rossini PM; Mazzoni A; Micera S
    J Neural Eng; 2021 Apr; 18(5):. PubMed ID: 33725672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Electromyogram synergy control of a dexterous artificial hand to unscrew and screw objects.
    Kent BA; Karnati N; Engeberg ED
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2014 Mar; 11():41. PubMed ID: 24655413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Learning from demonstration: Teaching a myoelectric prosthesis with an intact limb via reinforcement learning.
    Vasan G; Pilarski PM
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():1457-1464. PubMed ID: 28814025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Locomotor Adaptation by Transtibial Amputees Walking With an Experimental Powered Prosthesis Under Continuous Myoelectric Control.
    Huang S; Wensman JP; Ferris DP
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2016 May; 24(5):573-81. PubMed ID: 26057851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Decoding the grasping intention from electromyography during reaching motions.
    Batzianoulis I; Krausz NE; Simon AM; Hargrove L; Billard A
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 Jun; 15(1):57. PubMed ID: 29940991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A Prosthetic Hand Body Area Controller Based on Efficient Pattern Recognition Control Strategies.
    Benatti S; Milosevic B; Farella E; Gruppioni E; Benini L
    Sensors (Basel); 2017 Apr; 17(4):. PubMed ID: 28420135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. EMG-driven control in lower limb prostheses: a topic-based systematic review.
    Cimolato A; Driessen JJM; Mattos LS; De Momi E; Laffranchi M; De Michieli L
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2022 May; 19(1):43. PubMed ID: 35526003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Monitoring at-home prosthesis control improvements through real-time data logging.
    Osborn LE; Moran CW; Dodd LD; Sutton EE; Norena Acosta N; Wormley JM; Pyles CO; Gordge KD; Nordstrom MJ; Butkus JA; Forsberg JA; Pasquina PF; Fifer MS; Armiger RS
    J Neural Eng; 2022 May; 19(3):. PubMed ID: 35523131
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Improving myoelectric pattern recognition positional robustness using advanced training protocols.
    Scheme E; Biron K; Englehart K
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():4828-31. PubMed ID: 22255419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Upper Limb Prosthesis Control for High-Level Amputees via Myoelectric Recognition of Leg Gestures.
    Lyons KR; Joshi SS; Joshi SS; Lyons KR
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2018 May; 26(5):1056-1066. PubMed ID: 29752241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sensor fusion and computer vision for context-aware control of a multi degree-of-freedom prosthesis.
    Markovic M; Dosen S; Popovic D; Graimann B; Farina D
    J Neural Eng; 2015 Dec; 12(6):066022. PubMed ID: 26529274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Selection of EMG Sensors Based on Motion Coordinated Analysis.
    Chen L; Liu X; Xuan B; Zhang J; Liu Z; Zhang Y
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Feb; 21(4):. PubMed ID: 33562131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Multisession, noninvasive closed-loop neuroprosthetic control of grasping by upper limb amputees.
    Agashe HA; Paek AY; Contreras-Vidal JL
    Prog Brain Res; 2016; 228():107-28. PubMed ID: 27590967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Conditioning and sampling issues of EMG signals in motion recognition of multifunctional myoelectric prostheses.
    Li G; Li Y; Yu L; Geng Y
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2011 Jun; 39(6):1779-87. PubMed ID: 21293972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. High-density force myography: A possible alternative for upper-limb prosthetic control.
    Radmand A; Scheme E; Englehart K
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2016; 53(4):443-56. PubMed ID: 27532260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Myocontrol is closed-loop control: incidental feedback is sufficient for scaling the prosthesis force in routine grasping.
    Markovic M; Schweisfurth MA; Engels LF; Farina D; Dosen S
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 Sep; 15(1):81. PubMed ID: 30176929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Towards limb position invariant myoelectric pattern recognition using time-dependent spectral features.
    Khushaba RN; Takruri M; Miro JV; Kodagoda S
    Neural Netw; 2014 Jul; 55():42-58. PubMed ID: 24721224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Towards resolving the co-existing impacts of multiple dynamic factors on the performance of EMG-pattern recognition based prostheses.
    Asogbon MG; Samuel OW; Geng Y; Oluwagbemi O; Ning J; Chen S; Ganesh N; Feng P; Li G
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Feb; 184():105278. PubMed ID: 31901634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Differences in quality of movements made with body-powered and myoelectric prostheses during activities of daily living.
    Engdahl SM; Gates DH
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2021 Apr; 84():105311. PubMed ID: 33812199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.